Skip to main content
Log in

Relative contributions of crown and phenological traits to growth of a pseudo-backcross pine family ((slash × loblolly) × slash) and its pure species progenitors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tree Genetics & Genomes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One pseudo-backcross [(slash × loblolly) × slash] (BC1) and open-pollinated families of the pure species progenitors were established in a single test in North Central Florida. Multivariate analysis was used to estimate the intra-trait correlation among the taxa, and path analyses were used to determine the relative contributions of crown architectural and phenological traits to first-year height growth. The multivariate analysis indicated that BC1, slash, and loblolly pine have different relationships among the traits studied, suggesting that a separate path analysis was required for each taxon. Path analysis coefficients of determination of the final models were 0.69, 0.73, and 0.65 for the pseudo-backcross, loblolly, and slash pine families, respectively. The ranking of traits by relative magnitude of effect on total growth was, for the pseudo-backcross crown projected area (CPA), fascicle length (FL), number of nodes (NN), number of branches (NB), number of needles per fascicle (NF), and fascicle diameter. For loblolly, this was CPA, NB, FL, NN, NF, initiation, and specific leaf area. For slash, this was CPA, NN, FL, NF, and NB. The study indicated that all crown traits considered in the path analysis had moderate effects on first-year height growth, with the exceptions of the consistently large effect of CPA and the minimal effect of the phenological traits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RM, Scarbrough NM (1970) Morphology and length correlated in terminal flushes of longleaf pine saplings. Forest Service Research Paper SO-53, U.S. Department of Agriculture

  • Babar M, Khan AA, Arif A, Zafar Y, Arif M (2007) Path analysis of some leaf and panicle traits affecting grain yield in doubled haploid lines of rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Agric Res 45(4):245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes RD, Mullin LJ (1978) Three-year height performance of Pinus elliotii Engelm. var. elliotii × P. taeda L. hybrid families on three sites in Rhodesia. Silvae Genet 27:217–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Bidgoli AM, Akbari GA, Mirhadi MJ, Zand E, Soufizadeh S (2006) Path analysis of the relationships between seed yield and some morphological and phenological traits in safflower (Carthamus tictorius L.). Euphytica 148(3):261–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollen KA (1989) Structural equations with latent variables. Wiley, New York

  • Bollmann BS, Sweet GB (1977) Bud morphogenesis of Pinus radiata in New Zealand. 1. The initiation and extension of the leading shoot on one clone at two sites. N Z J For Sci 6:376–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Borders BE, Harrison WM (1989) Comparison of slash pine and loblolly pine performance on cutover site-prepared sites in the coastal plain of Georgia and Florida. South J Appl For 13(4):204–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracho RG, Starr G, Gholz HL, Martin TA, Cropper WP Jr, Loescher HW (2012) Controls on carbon dynamics by ecosystem structure and climate for southeastern U.S. slash pine plantations. Ecol Monogr 82:101–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campinhos EN, Peters-Robinson I, Bertolucci FL, Alfenas AC (1998) Interspecific hybridization and inbreeding effect in seed from a Eucalyptus grandis × E. urophylla clonal orchard in Brazil. Genet Mol Biol 21(3):369–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chmura DJ, Tjoelker MG (2008) Leaf traits in relation to crown development, light interception and growth of elite families of loblolly and slash pine. Tree Physiol 28:729–742

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chmura DJ, Rahman MS, Tjoelker MG (2007) Crown structure and biomass allocation patterns modulate aboveground productivity in young loblolly pine and slash pine. Forest Ecol Manag 243:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbert SR, Jokela EJ, Neary DG (1990) Effects of annual fertilization and sustained weed control on dry matter partitioning leaf area, and growth efficiency of juvenile loblolly and slash pine. For Sci 36:995–1014

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer CS, Wehner TC (1998) Fruit yield and yield component means and correlations of four slicing cucumber populations improved through six to ten cycles of recurrent selection. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123(3):388–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalla-Tea F, Jokela EJ (1991) Needlefall, canopy light interception, and productivity of young intensively managed slash and loblolly pine stands. For Sci 37:1298–1313

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey DR, Lu KH (1959) A correlation and path-coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Agron J 51(9):515–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorman KW (1976) The genetics and breeding of southern pines. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 471. Washington, DC

  • Duarte RA, Adams MW (1972) A path coefficient analysis of some yield components interrelations in field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Crop Sci 12:579–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emhart VI, Martin TA, White TL, Huber DA (2006) Genetic variation in basal area increment phenology and its correlation with growth rate in loblolly and slash pine families and clones. Can J For Res 36:961–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emhart VI, Martin TA, White TL, Huber DA (2007) Clonal variation in crown structure, absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and growth of loblolly pine and slash pine. Tree Physiol 27(3):421–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gezan SA, Huber DA, Medina AM, Parisi LM, Powell GL (2005) Cooperative Forest Genetics Research Program. 47th Progress Report. University of Florida, Gainesville

  • Gholz HL, Vogel SA, Cropper WP Jr, McKelvey K, Ewel KC, Teskey RO, Curran PJ (1991) Dynamics of canopy structure and light interception in Pinus elliottii stands, north Florida. Ecol Monogr 61:33–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour AR, Gobel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R (2006) ASReml user guide release 2.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, HP1 1ES, UK

  • Gonzalez C (2008) Interactions between xylem structure and water relations of southern pines. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

  • Govindaraju DR (1984) Path-analysis of the changes in quantitative characters in jack pine. New Phytol 97(4):691–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding KJ, Copley TR (2000) Wood property variation in Queensland-grown slash × Caribbean pine hybrids. In: Dungey HS, Dieters MJ, Nikles DG (eds) Proceedings of QFRI/CRC-SPF Symposium: Hybrid Breeding and Genetics of Forest Trees, Noosa, Queensland, Australia, 9–14 April 2000. Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, pp 160–167

  • Huber DA, White TL, Powell GL, Rockwood D, Atwood R (2000) Cooperative Forest Genetics Research Program. 42nd Annual Report. University of Florida, Gainesville

  • Huber DA, Parisi LM, Powell GL, Li X (2007) Cooperative Forest Genetics Research Program. 49th Annual Report. University of Florida, Gainesville

  • Huber DA, Munoz PR, Powell GL (2008) Cooperative Forest Genetics Research Program. 50th Annual Report. University of Florida, Gainesville

  • SAS Institute Inc. (2002–2003) SAS 9.1 Help and documentation. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

  • Jayawickrama KJS, McKeand SE, Jett JB (1998) Phenological variation in height and diameter growth in provenances and families of loblolly pine. New Forest 16:11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokela EJ, Long AJ (2000) Using soils to guide fertilizer recommendations for southern pines. Florida Cooperative Extension Service Circular 1230

  • Jokela EJ, Martin TA (2000) Effects of ontogeny and soil nutrient supply on production, allocation, and leaf area efficiency in loblolly and slash pine stands. Can J For Res 30:1511–1524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King NT, Seiler JR, Fox TR, Johnsen KH (2008) Post-fertilization physiology and growth performance of loblolly pine clones. Tree Physiol 28:703–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinghorn BP (2000) Crossbreeding strategies to maximise economic returns. In: Dungey HS, Dieters MJ, Nikles DG (eds) Proceedings of QFRI/CRC-SPF Symposium: Hybrid Breeding and Genetics of Forest Trees, Noosa, Queensland, Australia, 9–14 April 2000. Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, pp 291–302

  • Kraus JF (1986) Breeding shortleaf × loblolly pine hybrids for the development of fusiform rust-resistant loblolly pine. South J Appl For 10:195–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremer A (1985) Component analysis of height growth, compensation between components and seasonal stability of shoot elongation in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). Crop physiology of forest trees. Proceedings of an International Conference on Managing Forest Trees as Cultivated Plants, Finland, 23–28 July 1984, pp 203–217

  • Kremer A, Larson PR (1983) Genetic-control of height growth components in jack pine-seedlings. For Sci 29(3):451–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanner RM (1976) Patterns of shoot development in Pinus and their relationships to growth potential. In: Cannell MGR, Last FT (eds) Tree physiology and yield improvement. Academic, New York, pp 223–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Miliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Upton J (1999) Early growth, pest incidence, and cold hardiness of loblolly pine, slash pine, and some slash pine hybrids. PhD Dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

  • Lopez-Upton J, White TL, Huber DA (1999) Taxon and family differences in survival, cold hardiness, early growth, and rust incidence of loblolly, slash pine and some pine hybrids. Silvae Genet 48(6):303–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Upton J, Blakeslee GM, White TL, Huber DA (2000) Effects of the cultural treatments and genetics on tip moth infestation of loblolly pine, slash pine and some slash pine hybrids. For Gen 7(4):275–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist JE (2000) A method of estimating direct and indirect effects of Armillaria root disease and other small-scale forest disturbances on canopy gap size. For Sci 46(3):356–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Walsh JB (1998) Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, xvi+980 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TA, Jokela EJ (2004) Developmental patterns and nutrition impact radiation use efficiency components in southern pine stands. Ecol Appl 14:1839–1854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrady RL, Jokela EJ (1996) Growth phenology and crown structure of selected loblolly pine families planted at two spacings. For Sci 42:46–57

    Google Scholar 

  • McGarvey RC, Martin TA, White TL (2004) Integrating within-crown variation in net photosynthesis in loblolly and slash pine families. Tree Physiol 24:1209–1220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKeand S, Mullin T, Byram T, White T (2003) Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pines in the south. J For 101(3):32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirov NT, Duffield JW, Liddicoet AR (1952) Altitudinal races of Pinus ponderosa—a 12-year progress report. J For 50:825–831

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz PR (2009) Phenotypic analyses of first-year traits in a pseudo-backcross (slash × loblolly) × slash and the open-pollinated families of the pure species progenitors. MSc thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

  • Muñoz Del Valle PR, Huber DA, Butnor JR (2011) Phenotypic analysis of first-year traits in a pseudo-backcross (slash × loblolly) × slash and the open-pollinated families of the pure-species progenitors. Tree Genet Genomes 7(1):183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murthy R, Dougherty PM (1997) Estimating foliage area of loblolly pine shoots. For Sci 43:299–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikles DG (2000) Experience with some Pinus hybrids in Queensland, Australia. In: Dungey SH, Dieters MJ, Nikles DG (eds) Proceedings of QFRI/CRC-SPF Symposium: Hybrid Breeding and Genetics of Forest Trees, Noosa, Queensland, Australia, 9–14 April 2000. Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, pp 27–43

  • Osone Y, Ishida A, Tateno M (2008) Correlation between relative growth rate and specific leaf area requires associations of specific leaf area with nitrogen absorption rate of roots. New Phytol 179:417–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parisi LM (2006) Shoot elongation patterns and genetic control of second-year height growth in Pinus taeda L. using clonally replicated trials. MSc thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

  • Rasband WS (1997–2005) ImageJ. U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/. Accessed 26 January 2009

  • Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1992) Leaf life-span in relation to leaf, plant, and stand characteristics among diverse ecosystems. Ecol Monogr 62:365–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich PB, Wright IJ, Cavender-Bares JM, Craine JM, Oleksyn J, Westoby M, Walters MB (2003) The evolution of plant function variation: traits, spectra and strategies. Int J Plant Sci 164:S143–S164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM (1998) Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelbourne CJA (2000) Some insights on hybrids in forest tree improvement. In: Dungey HS, Dieters MJ, Nikles DG (eds) Proceedings of QFRI/CRC-SPF Symposium: Hybrid Breeding and Genetics of Forest Trees, Noosa, Queensland, Australia, 9–14 April 2000. Department of Primary Industries, Brisbane, pp 160–167

  • Shipley B, Lechowicz MJ, Wright I, Reich PB (2006) Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Ecology 87:535–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sijde HA, Roelofsen JW (1986) The potential of pine hybrids in South Africa. S Afr For J 136:5–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee MU (1972) Growth patterns of slash and Caribbean pine and their hybrids in Queensland. Euphytica 21:129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterck F, Martinez-Ramos M, Dyer-Leal G, Rodriguez-Velazquez J, Poorter L (2003) The consequences of crown traits for the growth and survival of tree saplings in a Mexican lowland rainforest. Funct Ecol 17(2):194–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas BP, Cummings E, Wittstruck WH (1985) Soil survey of Alachua County, Florida. US Department of Agriculture, SCS

  • Weisberg PJ (2004) Importance of non-stand-replacing fire for development of forest structure in the Pacific Northwest, USA. For Sci 50(2):245–258

    Google Scholar 

  • White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB (2007) Forest genetics. CABI, Wallingford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L, Blank G, Gruber C (1996) Desktop data analysis with SYSTAT. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Will RE, Barron GA, Burkes EC, Shiver B, Teskey RO (2001) Relationship between intercepted radiation, net photosynthesis, respiration, and rate of stem volume growth of Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii stands of different densities. For Ecol Manag 154:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Will RE, Narahari NV, Shiver BD, Teskey RO (2005) Effects of planting density on canopy dynamics and stem growth for intensively managed loblolly pine stands. For Ecol Manag 205:29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger RD (1996) Heterogeneous variance–covariance structures for repeated measures. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 1(2):205–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1921) Correlation and causation. J Agric Res 20:557–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (1960) Path coefficients and path regressions—alternative or complementary concepts. Biometrics 16(2):189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JW (1976) Introduction to forest genetics. Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan. Academic, New York

  • Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M, Ackerly DD, Baruch Z, Bongers F, Cavender-Bares J, Chapin T, Cornelissen JHC, Diemer M, Flexas J, Garnier E, Groom PK, Gulias J, Hikosaka K, Lamont BB, Lee T, Lee W, Lusk C, Midgley JJ, Navas ML, Niinemets U, Oleksyn J, Osada N, Poorter H, Poot P, Prior L, Pyankov VI, Roumet C, Thomas SC, Tjoelker MG, Veneklaas EJ, Villar R (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao Y, Jokela E, White TL (2003) Species differences in crown structure and growth performance of juvenile loblolly and slash pine. For Ecol Manag 174:295–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobel B, Talbert J (1984) Applied forest tree improvement. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the CFGRP under the Agriculture and Food Research Initiative of USDA's National Institute of Food and Agriculture Conifer Translational Genomic Network (CTGN) grant. The molecular markers were developed under the CTGN grant. The authors thank the CFGRP cooperators, in particular the University of Florida, Plum Creek Timber Company, and Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation for materials and land used in the project. We thank Greg Powell, Carlos Gonzales, Pablo Pinedo, Xiaobo Li, Andres Susaeta, Claudio Verdugo, Rodrigo Vergara, and Alejandro Riveros for their help in data collection. Thanks are also due to Salvador Gezan and Charlotte Germain for their useful comments and discussion about the project. Three anonymous reviewers are thanked for their useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricio R. Muñoz Del Valle.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Burdon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Del Valle, P.R.M., Huber, D.A. & Martin, T.A. Relative contributions of crown and phenological traits to growth of a pseudo-backcross pine family ((slash × loblolly) × slash) and its pure species progenitors. Tree Genetics & Genomes 8, 1281–1292 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-012-0514-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11295-012-0514-7

Keywords

Navigation