Abstract
This paper analyzes whether Austrian fiscal policies have been sustainable during the last five decades, concentrating on the federal (central state) level. Tests indicate that Austrian fiscal policies were sustainable, though with a decreasing weight attached to this goal. Starting in 1975, the unemployment rate played a significant role in the sense of a counter-cyclical orientation of Austrian fiscal policy as part of the concept of “Austrokeynesianism.” The development of public debt in Austria seems to be driven primarily not by ideology, but by structural causes and a shift of the budgetary policy paradigm. We find empirical evidence that governments in Austria dominated solely by one party run higher deficits than coalitions of the two large parties or the two conservative parties. There are no indications of a political business cycle.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1995). The political economy of budget deficits. IMF Staff Papers, 42(1), 1–31.
Barro, R. J. (1979). On the determination of the public debt. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), 940–971.
Bohn, H. (1998). The behavior of U.S. public debt and deficits. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 949–963.
Bohn, H. (2007). Are stationarity and cointegration restrictions really necessary for the intertemporal budget constraint? Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(7), 1837–1847.
Bohn, H. (2008). The sustainability of fiscal policy in the United States. In Neck and Sturm (pp. 15–49).
Frey, B. S., & Schneider, F. (1978). An empirical study of politico-economic interaction in the United States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 60(2), 174–183.
Kontopoulos, Y., & Perotti, R. (1999). Government fragmentation and fiscal policy outcomes: Evidence from OECD countries. In J. M. Poterba & J. von Hagen (Eds.), Fiscal institutions and fiscal performance (pp. 81–102). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Neck, R., & Getzner, M. (2001). Politico-economic determinants of public debt growth: a case study for Austria. Public Choice, 109(3–4), 243–268.
Neck, R. & Haber, G. (2008). The long shadow of “Austrokeynesianism”? Public debt sustainability in Austria. In Neck and Sturm (pp. 107–130).
Neck, R., & Haber, G. (2012). Is the Austrian public debt sustainable? International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 4(1), 1–16.
Neck, R., & Sturm, J.-E. (Eds.). (2008). Sustainability of public debt. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 90(1), 21–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Neck, R., Haber, G. & Klinglmair, A. Austrian Public Debt Growth: A Public Choice Perspective. Int Adv Econ Res 21, 249–260 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-015-9531-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-015-9531-2