Skip to main content
Log in

Class Absence, Instructor Lecture Notes, Intellectual Styles, and Learning Outcomes

  • Published:
Atlantic Economic Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

At many universities, undergraduate introductory economics courses are taught in large lecture halls. Casual empiricism suggests that rates of student absenteeism are significantly greater in the large lecture format compared to the smaller classroom format. There is also the compounding factor that numerous empirical studies have identified a statistically significant negative relationship between absenteeism and student performance. Using panel data, it is estimated that the average student with less than perfect attendance is better off attending the lecture, but studying from instructor-provided lecture notes can significantly reduce the negative effect of absence on exam performance. Additional estimates of the differential effects of intellectual styles show the notes were the least beneficial for the auditory intellectual style.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barsch, J. R. (1996). Barsch Learning Style Inventory. Novato: Academic Therapy Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, W. E., & Watts, M. (1996). Chalk and talk: a national survey on teaching undergraduate economics. American Economic Review, 86, 448–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bethune, J. (2010). Attendance, grades and learning in the microeconomic principles class. Journal of Economics and Education Research, 11(1).

  • Boatman, K., Courtney, R., & Lee, W. (2008). See how they learn: the impact of faculty and student learning styles on student performance in introductory economics. American Economist, 52(1), 39–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. W., & Liedholm, C. E. (2002). Can web courses replace the classroom in principles of microeconomics. American Economic Review, 92(2), 444–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics. Stata Press.

  • Charkins, R. J., O’Toole, D. M., & Wetzel, J. N. (1985). Linking teacher and student learning styles with student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Economic Education.

  • Chen, J., & Lin, T. (2008a). Class attendance and exam performance: a randomized experiment. Journal of Economic Education, 39(3), 213–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Lin, T. (2008b). Does downloading powerpoint slides before the lecture lead to better student achievement? International Review of Economic Education, 7(2), 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D., & Humphreys, B. R. (2003). An inventory of learning at a distance in economics. Social Science Computer Review, 21(2), 196–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal, R. B. (1999). Students’ intellectual styles in two classes: online distance learning and equivalent on-campus. College Teaching, 47(4), 130–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, N. (2012). VARK: A Guide to Learning Styles. Retrieved 5/15, 2013, from http://www.vark-learn.com/.

  • Goffe, W. L., & Sosin, K. (2005). Teaching with technology: may you live in interesting times. Journal of Economic Education, 36(3), 278–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, M. (2005). Voluntary use of online lecture notes: correlates of note usage an alternative to class attendance. Computers and Education, 44, 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gratton-Lavoie, C., & Stanley, D. (2009). Teaching and learning principles of microeconomics online: an empirical assessment. Journal of Economic Education, 40(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. (1982). Giving more choice to students in economic education: results and evaluation. Journal of Economic Education, (Winter), 19–31.

  • Halsne, A. E., & Gatta, L. A. (2002). Online versus traditionally delivered instruction: a descriptive study of learner characteristics in a community college setting, online. Journal of Distance Learning Education, 5(1).

  • Hamadea, R. F., & Artailb, H. A. (2010). A study of the influence of intellectual style of beginner computer-aided design users on their performance. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(5), 561–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marburger, D. R. (2001). Absenteeism and undergraduate exam performance. Journal of Economic Education, 32, 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marburger, D. R. (2006). Does mandatory attendance improve student performance? Journal of Economic Education, 37, 148–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reece, D. M. K. (2007). What’s Your Learning Style? Retrieved, 2014, from https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/content/group/MAN.74681.201010/examples/Exec%20summary:docs/Deanna/DeannaAssess.pdf.

  • Renzulli, J. S., & Smith, L. H. (1984). Learning style preferences: a practical approach for classroom teachers. Theory Into Practice, 23(1), 44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D. (1993). Do students go to class? Should they? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 167–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosin, K., Lawson, R., Hall, J., & Mateer, G. D. (2008). From Abba to zeppelin, led: using music to teach economics. Journal of Economic Education, 39(1), 107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanca, L. (2010). The effects of attendance on academic performance: panel data evidence for introductory microeconomics. Journal of Economic Education, 37(3), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of South Dakota. (2012). Inventory of Learning Styles. Retrieved, 2012, from http://www.usd.edu/trio/tut/ts/stylest.html.

  • Wynn-Williams, K., Whiting, R. H., & Adler, A. (2008). The influence of business case studies on intellectual styles; an empirical investigation. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 17(1), 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Sternberg, R. J., & Rayner, S. (2012). Intellectual Styles: Challenges, Milestones, and Agends. In L. Zhang, R. J. Sternberg, & S. Rayner (Eds.), Handbook of Intellectual Styles (pp. 1–20). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the editor and anonymous reviewer for their comments, and Lauren Dechant (Dartmouth Institute) and Richard Langlois and Joseph Renzulli (University of Connecticut) for their encouragement and helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oskar Harmon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harmon, O., Alpert, W., Banik, A. et al. Class Absence, Instructor Lecture Notes, Intellectual Styles, and Learning Outcomes. Atl Econ J 43, 349–361 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-015-9470-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11293-015-9470-6

Keywords

JEL

Navigation