Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reconsidering the role of ‘semi-natural habitat’ in agricultural landscape biodiversity: a case study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Ecological Research

Abstract

Semi-natural habitats are considered as the main source of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Most landscape ecology research has focused on the amount (relative surface) and spatial organisation of these habitats. However, these two components of landscape heterogeneity, composition and configuration, are often correlated. Also, landscape structure effects on biodiversity were mostly observed locally, while there is a great need for studying landscape-scale gamma diversity. We conducted a mensurative experiment to determine the independent effects of semi-natural habitat amount and configuration on gamma diversity of carabid beetles and vascular plants. The influence of landscape heterogeneity components were tested on species richness, evenness and composition. Local diversity (species richness and composition) was compared across the various cover types to determine their relative contributions. Only carabid species evenness and composition were influenced by semi-natural habitat amount. Carabid and plant species richness and plant species composition remained unaffected by semi-natural habitats. Local diversity analysis showed that three types of habitats can be distinguished in agricultural landscapes: grasslands (temporary and permanent ones), woody habitats (woodlands and hedgerows) and row crops. These results beg for a re-evaluation of the semi-natural covers. Temporary and permanent grasslands are often similar, probably because of comparable farming management. Permanent grasslands and woody habitats are often combined as semi-natural covers, although they support very different communities. The lack of effect of semi-natural habitat amount and configuration on gamma diversity results from a more complex organisation of biodiversity in landscapes and supports the move from semi-natural vs. farmland to habitat mosaic landscape representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of beta diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold TW (2010) Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. J Wildl Manag 74:1175–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aviron S, Burel F, Baudry J, Schermann N (2005) Carabid assemblages in agricultural landscapes: impacts of habitat features, landscape context at different spatial scales and farming intensity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:205–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J, Denis D (1995) Chloé: Utilitaire d’analyse de l’hétérogénéité d’une image (fichiers image IDRISI). Rennes, INRA, SAD-Armorique

  • Baudry J, Papy F (2001) The role of landscape heterogeneity in the sustainability of cropping systems. In: Nösberger J, Geiger HH, Struik PC (eds) Crop Science—Progress and Prospects. Cabi Publishing, Oxon, pp 243–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J, Bunce RGH, Burel F (2000) Hedgerows: an international perspective on their origin, function and management. J Environ Manag 60:7–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J, Schermann N, Boussard H (2006) Chloe 3.1: freeware of multi-scales analyses. INRA, SAD-Paysage

  • Bengtsson J, Ahnstrom J, Weibull AC (2005) The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 42:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett AF, Radford JQ, Haslem A (2006) Properties of land mosaics: implications for nature conservation in agricultural environments. Biol Conserv 133:250–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton TG, Vickery J, Wilson J (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol Evol 18:182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D, Bugter R, Arens P, Augenstein I, Aviron S, Baudry J, Bukacek R, Burel F, Cerny M, De Blust G, De Cock R, Diekotter T, Dietz H, Dirksen J, Dormann C, Durka W, Frenzel M, Hamersky R, Hendrickx F, Herzog F, Klotz S, Koolstra B, Lausch A, Le Coeur D, Maelfait JP, Opdam P, Roubalova M, Schermann A, Schermann N, Schmidt T, Schweiger O, Smulders MJM, Speelmans M, Simova P, Verboom J, van Wingerden W, Zobel M, Edwards PJ (2008) Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 45:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blitzer EJ, Dormann CF, Holzschuh A, Klein AM, Rand TA, Tscharntke T (2012) Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats. Agric Ecosyst Environ 146:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boitani L, Falcucci A, Maiorano L, Rondinini C (2007) Ecological networks as conceptual frameworks or operational tools in conservation. Conserv Biol 21:1414–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brudvig LA, Damschen EI, Tewksbury JJ, Haddad NM, Levey DJ (2009) Landscape connectivity promotes plant biodiversity spillover into non-target habitats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:9328–9332

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burel F, Baudry J, Butet A, Clergeau P, Delettre Y, Le Coeur D, Dubs F, Morvan N, Paillat G, Petit S, Thenail C, Brunel E, Lefeuvre JC (1998) Comparative biodiversity along a gradient of agricultural landscapes. Acta Oecol Int J Ecol 19:47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burel F, Butet A, Delettre YR, de la Pena NM (2004) Differential response of selected taxa to landscape context and agricultural intensification. Landsc Urban Plan 67:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and Multi-model inference. A practical information-theoretic Approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin-Kramer R, O’Rourke ME, Blitzer EJ, Kremen C (2011) A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity. Ecol Lett 14:922–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Concepcion ED, Fernandez-Gonzalez F, Diaz M (2012) Plant diversity partitioning in Mediterranean croplands: effects of farming intensity, field edge, and landscape context. Ecol Appl 22:972–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crist TO, Veech JA, Gering JC, Summerville KS (2003) Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: a hierarchical analysis of alpha, beta, and gamma diversity. Am Nat 162:734–743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diekotter T, Billeter R, Crist TO (2008) Effects of landscape connectivity on the spatial distribution of insect diversity in agricultural mosaic landscapes. Basic Appl Ecol 9:298–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duelli P (1997) Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scales. Agric Ecosyst Environ 62:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenbrod F, Hecnar SJ, Fahrig L (2011) Sub-optimal study design has major impacts on landscape-scale inference. Biol Conserv 144:298–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekroos J, Hyvonen T, Tiainen J, Tiira M (2010) Responses in plant and carabid communities to farming practises in boreal landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 135:288–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernoult A, Tremauville Y, Cellier D, Margerie P, Langlois E, Alard D (2006) Potential landscape drivers of biodiversity components in a flood plain: past or present patterns? Biol Conserv 127:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L, Baudry J, Brotons L, Burel FG, Crist TO, Fuller RJ, Sirami C, Siriwardena GM, Martin JL (2011) Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol Lett 14:101–112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel D, Thies C, Tscharntke T (2005) Local diversity of arable weeds increases with landscape complexity. Perspectives in Plant Ecology Evolution and Systematics 7:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaujour E, Amiaud B, Mignolet C, Plantureux S (2012) Factors and processes affecting plant biodiversity in permanent grasslands. A review. Agronomy Sustain Devel 32:133–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths GJK, Winder L, Holland JM, Thomas CFG, Williams E (2007) The representation and functional composition of carabid and staphylinid beetles in different field boundary types at a farm-scale. Biol Conserv 135:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickx F, Maelfait JP, Van Wingerden W, Schweiger O, Speelmans M, Aviron S, Augenstein I, Billeter R, Bailey D, Bukacek R, Burel F, Diekotter T, Dirksen J, Herzog F, Liira J, Roubalova M, Vandomme V, Bugter R (2007) How landscape structure, land-use intensity and habitat diversity affect components of total arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 44:340–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JM (2002) Carabid beetles: their ecology, survival and use in agroecosystems. In: Holland JM (ed) The agroecology of carabid beetles. Intercept Press, Andover, pp 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzschuh A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2010) How do landscape composition and configuration, organic farming and fallow strips affect the diversity of bees, wasps and their parasitoids? J Anim Ecol 79:491–500

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert-Moy L, Nabucet J, Vannier C, Lefebvre A (2012) Mapping ecological continuities: which data for which territorial level? Application to the forest and hedge network. Int J Geomat Spat Anal 22:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeanneret P, Schupbach B, Luka H (2003) Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:311–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kromp B (1999) Carabid beetles in sustainable agriculture: a review on pest control efficacy, cultivation impacts and enhancement. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:187–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux X, Barbault R, Baudry J, Burel F, Doussan I, Garnier E, Herzog F, Lavorel S, Lifran R, Roger-Estrade J, Sarthou JP, Trommetter M (2008) Agriculture et biodiversité. Valoriser les synergies. Expertise scientifique collective. Rapport INRA, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2007) Tackling the habitat fragmentation panchreston. Trends Ecol Evol 22:127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macfadyen S, Muller W (2013) Edges in agricultural landscapes: species interactions and movement of natural enemies. Plos One 8:e59659

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod A, Wratten SD, Sotherton NW, Thomas MB (2004) ‘Beetle banks’ as refuges for beneficial arthropods in farmland: long-term changes in predator communities and habitat. Agric Entomol 6:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeus JHA (1993) The transformation of agricultural landscapes in Western-Europe. Sci Total Environ 129:171–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millan-Pena N, Butet A, Delettre Y, Morant P, Burel F (2003) Landscape context and carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) communities of hedgerows in western France. Agric Ecosyst Environ 94:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Poggio SL, Chaneton EJ, Ghersa CM (2010) Landscape complexity differentially affects alpha, beta, and gamma diversities of plants occurring in fencerows and crop fields. Biol Conserv 143:2477–2486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purtauf T, Roschewitz I, Dauber J, Thies C, Tscharntke T, Wolters V (2005) Landscape context of organic and conventional farms: influences on carabid beetle diversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108:165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson RA, Wilson JD, Crick HQP (2001) The importance of arable habitat for farmland birds in grassland landscapes. J Appl Ecol 38:1059–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche B, Lanoë E, Le Coeur D, Thenail C, Martel G (2010) Diversité des systèmes de polyculture élevage et des modes d’exploitation des prairies : quelles conséquences sur la diversité végétale? Rencontres recherches ruminants http://www.journees3r.fr/spip.php?article2973

  • Roger JL, Jambon O, Bouger G (2010) Clé de détermination des carabidés : paysages agricoles de la Zone Atelier d’Armorique. Laboratoires INRA SAD-Paysage et CNRS ECOBIO, Rennes

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AC, Koper N, Francis CM, Fahrig L (2009) Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation. Landsc Ecol 24:1271–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith AC, Fahrig L, Francis CM (2011) Landscape size affects the relative importance of habitat amount, habitat fragmentation, and matrix quality on forest birds. Ecography 34:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thies C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Effects of landscape context on herbivory and parasitism at different spatial scales. Oikos 101:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton DH, Branch LC, Sunquist ME (2011) The influence of landscape, patch, and within-patch factors on species presence and abundance: a review of focal patch studies. Landsc Ecol 26:7–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Bommarco R, Clough Y, Crist TO, Kleijn D, Rand TA, Tylianakis JM, Nouhuys SV, Vidal S (2007) Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale. Biol Control 43:294–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Rand TA, Didham RK, Fahrig L, Batary P, Bengtsson J, Clough Y, Crist TO, Dormann CF, Ewers RM, Frund J, Holt RD, Holzschuh A, Klein AM, Kleijn D, Kremen C, Landis DA, Laurance W, Lindenmayer D, Scherber C, Sodhi N, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C, van der Putten WH, Westphal C (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes—eight hypotheses. Biol Rev 87:661–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock BA, Redhead J, Vanbergen AJ, Hulmes L, Hulmes S, Peyton J, Nowakowski M, Pywell RF, Heard MS (2010) Impact of habitat type and landscape structure on biomass, species richness and functional diversity of ground beetles. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

R. Duflot benefited from a PhD grant from Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-Institut Ecologie et Environnement (CNRS-InEE). Additional financial support was provided by the DIVA-Corridor research project from the French Ministry of Ecology. Our research also benefited from the Zone-Atelier Armorique, which is financially supported by INRA and CNRS-InEE. The collaboration with L. Fahrig was supported by the International Doctorate College of the European University of Brittany and the Brittany region. We thank J. Nabucet from CNRS research team LETG—Costel (Littoral, Environnement, Télédétection, Géomatique) for his work on the production of maps and Y. Rantier for its support in GIS data analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UMR 6553 Ecobio, CNRS Université de Rennes 1, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042, Rennes Cedex, France

    Rémi Duflot, Aude Ernoult & Françoise Burel

  2. UR 980 SAD-Paysage INRA, 65 Rue de Saint Brieuc, CS 84215, 35042, Rennes Cedex, France

    Rémi Duflot & Stéphanie Aviron

  3. Geomatics and Landscape Ecology Research Laboratory, Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada

    Lenore Fahrig

Authors
  1. Rémi Duflot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stéphanie Aviron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aude Ernoult
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lenore Fahrig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Françoise Burel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rémi Duflot.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 54 kb)

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duflot, R., Aviron, S., Ernoult, A. et al. Reconsidering the role of ‘semi-natural habitat’ in agricultural landscape biodiversity: a case study. Ecol Res 30, 75–83 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-014-1211-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-014-1211-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation