Skip to main content
Log in

Contamination issues in a continuous ethanol production corn wet milling facility

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Low ethanol yields and poor yeast viability were investigated at a continuous ethanol production corn wet milling facility. Using starch slurries and recycle streams from a commercial ethanol facility, laboratory hydrolysates were prepared by reproducing starch liquefaction and saccharification steps in the laboratory. Fermentations with hydrolysates prepared in the laboratory were compared with plant hydrolysates for final ethanol concentrations and total yeast counts. Fermentation controls were prepared using hydrolysates (plant and laboratory) that were not inoculated with yeast. Hydrolysates prepared in the laboratory resulted in higher final ethanol concentrations (15.8 % v/v) than plant hydrolysate (13.4 % v/v). Uninoculated controls resulted in ethanol production from both laboratory (12.2 % v/v) and plant hydrolysates (13.7 % v/v), indicating the presence of a contaminating microorganism. Yeast colony counts on cycloheximide and virginiamycin plates confirmed the presence of a contaminant. DNA sequencing and fingerprinting studies also indicated a number of dissimilar communities in samples obtained from fermentors, coolers, saccharification tanks, and thin stillage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbott DA, Ingledew WM (2005) The importance of aeration strategy in fuel alcohol fermentations contaminated with Dekkera/Brettanomyces yeasts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69:16–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Basilio ACM, Araujo PRL, de Morais JOF, da Silva Filho EA, de Morais Jr MA, Simoes DA (2008) Detection and identification of wild yeast contaminants of the industrial fuel ethanol fermentation process. Curr Microbiol 56:322–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff KM, Siqing L, Leathers TD, Worthington RE, Rich JO (2008) Modeling bacterial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentation. Biotech Bioeng 103:117–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang IS, Kim BH, Shin PK, Lee WK (1995) Bacterial contamination and its effects on ethanol fermentation. Microbiol Biotechnol 12:309–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke K, Green R (1988) Statistical design and analysis for a ‘biological effects’ study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 46:213–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza-Liberal AT, da Silva Fihlo EA, de Morais JOF, Simoes DA, de Morais Jr MA (2005) Contaminant yeast detection in industrial ethanol fermentation must by rDNA-PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol 40:19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Souza-Liberal AT, Basilio ACM, do Monte Resende A, Brasileiro BTV, da Silva Fihlo EA, de Morais JOF, Simoes DA, de Morais MA Jr (2007) Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis as a major contaminant yeast in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation. Appl Microbiol 102:538–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond A, Ashton B, Cheung M, Heled J, Kearse M, Stones-Havas S, Thierer T, Wilson A (2009) Geneious v4.7. Available from http://www.geneious.com

  • Ingledew WM (2003) Continuous fermentation in the fuel alcohol industry: how does the technology affect yeast. In: Jacques KA, Lyons TP, Kelsall DR (eds) The alcohol textbook: a reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 135–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson LA, May JB (2003) Wet milling: the basis for corn biorefineries. In: White PJ, Johnson LA (eds) Corn: chemistry and technology. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN, pp 44–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent AD, Jones SE, Yannarell AC, Lauster GH, Graham JH, Kratz TK, Triplett EW (2004) Annual patterns in bacterioplankton community variability in a humic lake. Microb Ecol 48:550–560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier Science, BV, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Madson PW, Muttagh JE (1991) Fuel ethanol in USA: review of reason for 75% failure rate of plants built. IX International Symposium on Alcohol Fuels, Firenze, ISAF, pp 119–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthaiyan A, Limayem A, Ricke SC (2011) Antimicrobial strategies for limiting bacterial contaminants in fuel bioethanol fermentations. Prog Energy Combust Sci 37:351–370

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Narendranath NV (2003) Bacterial contamination and control in ethanol production. In: Jacques KA, Lyons TP, Kelsall DR (eds) The alcohol textbook: a reference for the beverage, fuel and industrial alcohol industries. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 287–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Pejin D, Mojovic L, Grujic O, Pejin J, Rankin M (2009) The bioethanol production with thin stillage recirculation. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q 15:49–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rees GN, Baldwin DS, Watson GO, Perryman S, Nielsen DL (2004) Ordination and significance testing of microbial community composition derived from terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms: application of multivariate statistics. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 86:339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RFA (2012) Annual industry outlook, renewable fuels association. Available online at: http://ethanolrfa.3cdn.net/d4ad995ffb7ae8fbfe_1vm62ypzd.pdf. Accessed 27 Feb 2012

  • Sequerra J, Marmeisse R, Valla G, Normand P, Capellano A, Moiroud A (1997) Taxonomic position and intraspecific variability of the nodule forming Penicillium nodositatum inferred from RFLP analysis of the ribosomal intergenic spacer and random amplified polymorphic DNA. Mycol Res 101:465–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner KA, Leathers TD (2004) Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production. Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 31:401–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yannarell AC, Triplett EW (2004) Within- and between-lake variability in the composition of bacterioplankton communities: investigations at multiple spatial scales. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:214–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yannarell AC, Triplett EW (2005) Geographic and environmental sources of variation in lake bacterial community composition. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:227–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Melinda S. Nunnally and Eric Hoecker for expert technical assistance. Authors also thank Yu-rui Chang for conducting DNA fingerprinting and sequencing experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijay Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Khullar, E., Kent, A.D., Leathers, T.D. et al. Contamination issues in a continuous ethanol production corn wet milling facility. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29, 891–898 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1244-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-012-1244-6

Keywords

Navigation