Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Field Evaluation of Rain Garden Flow and Pollutant Treatment

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rain gardens have been recommended as a best management practice to treat stormwater runoff. However, no published field performance data existed on pollutant removal capabilities. Replicated rain gardens were constructed in Haddam, CT, to capture shingled-roof runoff. The gardens were sized to store the first 2.54 cm (1 inch) of runoff. Influent, overflow and percolate flow were measured using tipping buckets and sampled passively. Precipitation was also measured and sampled for quality. All weekly composite water samples were analyzed for total phosphorus (TP), total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), ammonia-nitrogen (NH3-N), and nitrite+nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N). Monthly composite samples were analyzed for copper (Cu), lead (Pb) and zinc (Zn). Redox potential was measured using platinum electrodes. Poor treatment of NO3-N, TKN, organic-N, and TP in roof runoff was observed. Many Cu, Pb and Zn samples were below detection limit, so statistical analysis was not performed on these pollutants. The only pollutants significantly lower in the effluent than in the influent were NH3-N in both gardens and total-N in one garden. The design used for these rain gardens worked well for overall flow retention, but had little impact pollutant concentrations in percolate. These results suggest that if an underdrain is not connected to the stormwater system, high flow and pollutant retention could be achieved with the 2.54 cm design method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation: 1998, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.

  • Bannerman, R. T., Owens, D. W., Dodds, R. B. and Hornewer, N. J.: 1993, ‘Sources of pollutants in wisconsin stormwater’, Wat. Sci. Tech. 28(3-5), 241–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, H. L., McNeal, B. L. and O'Connor, G. A.: 2001, Soil Chemistry, 3rd edn., John Wiley and Sons, New York, 302 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley, R. J., Perkins, C., Trahiotis, M. and Nadim, F.: 2001, ‘Final report, nitrogen deposition monitoring in connecticut’, Environmental Research Institute, University of Connecticut, submitted to Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection Air Management Bureau Chief, Hartford, CT, 06106.

  • Chang, M. and Crowley, C. M.: 1993, ‘Preliminary observations on water quality of storm runoff from four selected residential roofs’, Water Resources Bulletin 29(5), 777–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Lenexa: 2003, ‘Rain Garden Design Principles’, City of Lenexa Watershed Management Division, Lenexa, KS.

  • Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection: 2002, ‘Water Quality Standards’, 79 Elm St., Hartford, CT 06106.

  • Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H. and Minami, C.: 2001, ‘Laboratory study of biological retention for urban stormwater management’, Water Environ. Res. 73(1), 5–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J. S., Likens, G. E. and Bormann, F. H.: 1973, ‘Throughfall and stemflow chemistry in a northern hardwood forest’, J. Ecol. 61(2), 495–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, B. K. and Suckling, P. W.: 1990, ‘Changing rainfall-runoff relationships in the urbanizing peachtree creek watershed, Atlanta, Georgia’, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 26(2), 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, G. W. and Bauder, J. W.: 1979, ‘Particle size analysis by hydrometer: A simplified method for routine textural analysis and a sensitivity test of measurement parameters’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43, 1004–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, C. P., Elliott, H. A. and Ashmead, R. M.: 1977, ‘Interfacial reactions and the fate of heavy metals in soil-water systems’, J. Water. Pollut. Con. Fed. 49(5), 745–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, W. F. and White, N.: 2001, ‘Urban waterways: Designing rain gardens (Bioretention Areas)’, North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service.

  • Kim, H., Seagren, E. A. and Davis, A. P.: 2003, ‘Engineered bioretention for removal of nitrate from stormwater runoff’, Water Environ. Res. 75(4), 355–367.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuichling, E.: 1889, ‘The relation between the rainfall and the discharge of sewers in populous districts’, Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 20, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L. B.: 1968, ‘Hydrology for urban land planning-a guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use’, Geological Survey Circular 554.

  • Mason, Y., Ammann, A. A., Ulrich, A. and Sigg, L.: 1999, ‘Behavior of heavy metals, nutrients, and major components during roof runoff infiltration’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 1588–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadim, F., Trahiotis, M., Stapcinskaite, S., Perkins, C., Carley, R., Hoag, G. E. and Yang, X.: 2001, ‘Estimation of wet, dry and bulk deposition of atmospheric nitrogen in connecticut’, J. Environ. Monitoring. 3, 671–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: 2003, Climatological data annual summary, New England. National Climatic Data Center. Asheville, NC.

  • NEC-67 (Northeast Regional Coordinating Committee on Soil Testing): 1995, Recommended Soil Testing Procedures for the Northeastern United States, Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Delaware, DE, USA. Bulletin #493.

  • Novotny, V. and Olem, H.: 1994, Water Quality: Prevention, Identification, and Management of Diffuse Pollution, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1054 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince George's County: 1993, ‘Design Manual for Use of Bioretention in Stormwater Management’, Prince George's County (MD) Government, Department of Environmental Protection. Watershed Protection Branch, Landover, MD.

  • Prince George's County: 2002, ‘The Bioretention Manual’, Prince George's County (MD) Government, Department of Environmental Protection. Watershed Protection Branch, Landover, MD.

  • SAS Institute, Inc.: 2002, The SAS System for Windows (Release 9.0). Cary, NC.

  • SCS (U.S. Soil Conservation Service): 1986, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture Technical Release No. 55 (revised). 210-VI-TR-55.

  • Soil Science Society of America: 2002, Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4: Physical Methods, Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, WI, 53711, 1692 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, M. E. and Miller, W. P.: 1996, ‘Cation exchange capacity and exchange coefficients’, in Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3. Chemical Methods, Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 1201–1221.

  • United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service: 1979, ‘Soil survey of Middlesex County, Connecticut’.

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: 1978, ‘Microbiological Methods for Monitoring the Environment’, EPA 600/8-78-017. Office of Research and Development. Cincinnati, OH 45268.

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: 1983a, ‘Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes’, EPA 600/4-79-020. Office of Research and Development. Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268.

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: 1983b, ‘Results of the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program’, NTIS PB84-185552.

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: 1994, ‘Method 6020, Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry’, EPA SW-846 Ch. 3.3, Revision 0, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45268.

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: 2000, ‘Low Impact Development (LID), a Literature Review’, EPA-841-B-00-005, Office of Water, Washington, DC, 20460.

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency: 2001, ‘Method 200.7, Trace Elements in Water, Solids, and Biosolids by Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry’, Revision 5.0, EPA-821-R-01-010, Office of Research and Development, Cincinatti, Ohio, 45268.

  • Waananen, A. O.: 1969, ‘Urban effects on water yield’, in W. L. Moore and C. W. Morgan (eds), Effects of Watershed Changes on Streamflow, University of Texas Press, Austin and London, 89 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisonsin Department of Natural Resources: 2003, ‘Rain gardens: A How-To Manual for Homeowners’, DNR Publication PUB-WT-776 2003.

  • Yang, X., Miller, D. R., Xu, X., Yang, L. H., Chen, H. M. and Nikolaidis, N. P.: 1996, ‘Spatial and temporal variations of atmospheric deposition in interior and coastal connecticut’, Atmos. Environ. 30(22), 3801–3810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zobrist, J., Müller, S. R., Ammann, A., Bucheli, T. D., Mottier, V., Ochs, M., Schoenenberger, R., Eugster, J. and Boller, M.: 2000, ‘Quality of roof runoff for groundwater infiltration’, Water Res. 34(5), 1455–1462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Natural Resources Management and Engineering, University of Connecticut, 1376 Storrs Rd., Unit 4087, Storrs, CT, 06269-4087, USA

    Michael E. Dietz & John C. Clausen

Authors
  1. Michael E. Dietz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John C. Clausen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael E. Dietz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dietz, M.E., Clausen, J.C. A Field Evaluation of Rain Garden Flow and Pollutant Treatment. Water Air Soil Pollut 167, 123–138 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-8266-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-8266-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation