Abstract
This paper includes country level virtual water data in an Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for water pollution. Virtual water accounts for the total amount of water required to produce a good in all stages of production. This paper constructs a water independence index, defined as the water required in domestic production divided by the amount of water required for all imported goods. Results suggest an increase in trade openness and importing water intensive goods may lower water pollution levels.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Affuso E, Mixon FG Jr (2014) Virtual water trade in North America. Economia Internazionale/International Economics LXVII(3):319–336
Antweiler W, Copeland B, Taylor S (2001) Is free trade good for the environment. Am Econ Rev 91(4):877–908
Chen M (2010) “Rule of Law and environmental policy stringency”, working paper 10–3, institute for the study of international aspects of competition. University of Rhode Island, Kingston
Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth and the environment. J Econ Lit 42:7–71
de Bruyn SM and Heintz RJ (1999) The environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. In Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, 656–677
Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49:431–455
Fulazzaky MA (2013) Measurement of biochemical oxygen demand of the leachates. Environ Monit Assess 186(6):4721–4734
Gawande K, Berrens RP, Bohara AK (2001) A consumption based theory of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 37(1):101–112
Grossman GM and Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Paper 3914
Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM (2012) The water footprint of humanity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(9):3232–3237
Jeffords C, Minkler L (2016) Do constitutions matter? the effects of constitutional environmental rights provisions on environmental outcomes. KYKLOS 69(2):294–335
Lin Cynthia CY and Zachary Liscow (2009) “On the Political Mechanisms of the Environmental Kuznets Curve for Global Water Quality.” Working Paper
Managi S, Hibiki A, Tsurumi T (2009) Does trade openness improve environmental quality? J Environ Econ Manag 58:346–363
Muyibi S, Ambali A, Eissa G (2008) The impact of economic development on water pollution: trends and policy actions in Malaysia. Water Resour Manag 22:485–508. doi:10.1007/s11269-007-9174-z
Nationmaster (2013) http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Environment/Water-pollution. Accessed 4/26/16
Shanmugam P, Neelamani S, Ahn YH, Philip L, Hong G (2007) Assessment of the level of coastal marine pollution of Chennai City, Southern India. J Water Resour Manag 21:1187. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9075-6
Sigman H (2002) International spillovers and water quality in rivers: Do countries free ride? Am Econ Rev 92:1152–1159
Stern DI, Common MS, Barbier EB (1996) Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Dev 24:1151–1160
The World Bank Data (2015) http://data.worldbank.org/indicator. Accessed 8/25/2015
The World Governance Indicators (2016) Produced by Daniel Kaufmann and Aart Kraay. Accessed 10/15/2016
Thompson A (2013) Accounting for population in an EKC for water pollution. J Environ Prot 4:7A
Water footprint statistics (WaterStat) (2012) http://waterfootprint.org/en/resources/water-footprint-statistics/. Accessed 8/20/2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thompson, A., Jeffords, C. Virtual Water and an EKC for Water Pollution. Water Resour Manage 31, 1061–1066 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1541-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1541-1