Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainability Assessment of Urban Water Distribution Systems

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A methodology is presented for determining sustainability indices for pressure and water age in water distribution systems (WDSs). These sustainability indices are based upon performance criteria including reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability. Pressure and water age are determined for a WDS as a function of operation time using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPANET model. The values of pressure and water age are used to determine reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability performance criteria, which are then combined into the nodal sustainability indices for water age and pressure. In addition, the sustainability index (SI) computations are performed for zones to define the SI for water age and SI for pressure. A combined SI calculation is performed to produce an overall sustainability score for the entire zone in the water distribution network. The proposed methodology can be used to monitor the sustainability of existing WDSs and to help define alternative solutions including changes in pump operation and modifications to WDS to increase the sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Water (2013) Energy & water. http://www.amwater.com/corporate-responsibility/corporate-responsibility-reporting/our-priority-your-water/energy-and-water.html Accessed 20 Jun 2014

  • AWWA (American Water Works Association), AWWARF (American Water Works Association Research Foundation) (1992) Water industry database: utility profiles. AWWA, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • AWWA (American Water Works Association) (2002) Effects of water age on distribution system water quality. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/disinfection/tcr/pdfs/whitepaper_tcr_waterdistribution.pdf Accessed 27 June 2014

  • Capón-García E, Espuña A, Puigjaner L (2009) Statistical and simulation tools for designing an optimal blanketing system of a multiple-tank facility. Chem Eng J 152:122–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin DA (2000) Water resources engineering. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Digiano FA, Weaver CC, Okun DA (2009) Benefits of shifting fire protection to reclaimed water. J Am Water Works Assoc 101(2):65–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Furnass WR, Mounce SR, Boxall JB (2013) Linking distribution system water quality issues to possible causes via hydraulic pathways. Environ Model Softw 40:78–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacomoni M.H. and Zechman E.M. (2011) Assessing sustainability of integrated urban water resources systems through a complex adaptive systems approach. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE, 2844–2851

  • Giannetti BF, Bonilla SH, Silva CC, Almeida CM (2009) The reliability of experts’ opinions in constructing a composite environmental index: the case of ESI 2005. J Environ Manag 90(8):2448–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH (2010) Roadmap for sustainable water resources in southwestern North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(50):21300–21305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman FE, Mays LW (2005) Water distribution system operation: application of simulated annealing. In: Mays LW (ed) Water resource systems management tools. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Limona JA, Riesgo L (2009) Alternative approaches to the construction of a composite indicator of agricultural sustainability: an application to irrigated agriculture in the Duero basin in Spain. J Environ Manag 90(11):3345–3362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Great Lakes and Upper Mississippi River Board of State Public Health & Environmental Managers (GLUMB) (1992) Recommended standards for water works. Albany, New York

  • Hamouda MA, El-Din MMN, Moursy FI (2009) Vulnerability assessment of water resources systems in the Eastern Nile Basin. J Water Resour Manag 23:2697–2725

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto T, Stedinger JR, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency and vulnerability criteria for water resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herstein LM, Filion YR, Hall KR (2011) Evaluating the environmental impacts of water distribution systems by using EIO-LCA-Based multiobjective optimization. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137:162–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizar L.H., Kang D., and Lansey K (2011) A decision support system for sustainable urban water supply. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, ASCE, 3238–3250

  • Husband PS, Boxall JB (2011) Asset deterioration and discolouration in water distribution systems. Water Res 45(1):113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun L, Guoping Y (2013) Iterative methodology of pressure-dependent demand based on EPANET for pressure-deficient water distribution analysis. J Water Resour Plan Manag ASCE 139(1):34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay PA (2000) Measuring sustainability in Israel’s water system. Water Int 25(4):617–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurek W, Ostfeld A (2013) Multi-objective optimization of water quality, pumps operation, and storage sizing of water distribution systems. J Environ Manag 115:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberton M., Newman D., Eden S. and Gelt J. (2010) The water-energy nexus. http://www.circleofblue.org/waternews/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/University-of-Arizona-water-energy-arroyo_2010.pdf Accessed 07 Mar 2013)

  • Li Y, Yang ZF (2011) Quantifying the sustainability of water use systems: calculating the balance between network efficiency and resilience. Ecol Model 222:1771–1780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP (1997) Quantifying trends in system sustainability. Hydrol Sci J 42(4):513–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendez M, Araya JA, Sanchez LD (2013) Automated parameter optimization of a water distribution system. J Hydroinf 15(1):71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozger S, Mays LW (2005) Optimal location of isolation valves in water distribution systems: a reliability/optimization approach. In: Mays LW (ed) Water resource systems management tools. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Piratla KR, Ariaratnam ST (2012) Reliability based optimal design of water distribution networks considering life cycle components. Urban Water J 9(5):305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossman LA (2000) EPANET 2 users manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval-Solis S, McKinney DC, Loucks DP (2011) Sustainability index for water resources planning and management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(5):381–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 15:281–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swamee PK, Sharma AK (2008) Design of water supply pipe networks. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tabesh M, Dolatkhahi A (2006) Effects of pressure dependent analysis on quality performance assessment of water distribution networks. Iran J Sci Technol 30(B1):119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabesh M, Saber H (2012) A prioritization model for rehabilitation of water distribution networks using GIS. J Water Resour Manag 26:225–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabesh M, Delavar MR, Delkhah A (2010) Use of geospatial information system based tool for renovation and rehabilitation of water distribution systems. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7(1):47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (1999) Design of small water systems. http://publications.usace.army.mil/publications/eng-manuals/EM_1110-2-503/EM_1110-2-503.pdf Accessed 25 Feb 2013

  • USEPA (United States of Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Effects of water age on distribution system water quality. http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/disinfection/tcr/pdfs/whitepaper_tcr_waterdistribution.pdf Accessed 07 Mar 2013

  • Yilmaz B, Harmancioglu NB (2010) An indicator based assessment for water resources management in Gediz River Basin, Turkey. J Water Resour Manag 24:4359–4379

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Urban Water Management, University of Kaiserslautern, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany

    Nazli Yonca Aydin & Theo Schmitt

  2. School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-5306, USA

    Larry Mays

Authors
  1. Nazli Yonca Aydin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Larry Mays
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Theo Schmitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry Mays.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aydin, N.Y., Mays, L. & Schmitt, T. Sustainability Assessment of Urban Water Distribution Systems. Water Resour Manage 28, 4373–4384 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0757-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0757-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation