Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of three unit hydrograph models to predict the surface runoff from a Canadian watershed

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The predictability of unit hydrograph (UH) models that are based on the concepts of land morphology and isochrones to generate direct runoff hydrograph (DRH) were evaluated in this paper. The intention of this study was to evaluate the models for accurate runoff prediction from ungauged watershed using the ArcGIS® tool. Three models such as exponential distributed geomorphologic instantaneous unit hydrograph (ED-GIUH) model, GIUH based Clark model, and spatially distributed unit hydrograph (SDUH) model, were used to generate the DRHs for the St. Esprit watershed, Quebec, Canada. Predictability of these models was evaluated by comparing the generated DRHs versus the observed DRH at the watershed outlet. The model input data, including natural drainage network and Horton's morphological parameters (e.g. isochrone and instantaneous unit hydrograph), were prepared using a watershed morphological estimation tool (WMET) on ArcGIS® platform. The isochrone feature class was generated in ArcGIS® using the time of concentration concepts for overland and channel flow and the instantaneous unit hydrograph was generated using the Clark's reservoir routing and S-hydrograph methods. An accounting procedure was used to estimate UH and DRHs from rainfall events of the watershed. The variable slope method and phi-index method were used for base flow separation and rainfall excess estimation, respectively. It was revealed that the ED-GIUH models performed better for prediction of DRHs for short duration (≤6 h) storm events more accurately (prediction error as low as 4.6–22.8%) for the study watershed, than the GIUH and SDUH models. Thus, facilitated by using ArcGIS®, the ED-GIUH model could be used as a potential tool to predict DRHs for ungauged watersheds that have similar geomorphology as that of the St. Esprit watershed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill Company, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark CO (1945) Storage and the unit hydrograph. Trans. ASCE 110:1419–1446

    Google Scholar 

  • HEC (2000) Hydrologic engineering center HEC-HMS user's manual. Davis, California

  • Garg V, Chaubey BE, Haggard BE (2003) Impact of calibration watershed on ruoff model accuracy. Trans. ASAE 46(5):1347–1353

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta VK, Wymire ED, Wang CT (1980) A Representation of an Instantaneous Unit Hydrograph from Geomorphology. Water Resour Res 16(5):855–862

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton R (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basin: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Geol Soc Am Bull 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Chowdhry H, Seth SM, Nema RK (1997) Flood estimation using a GIUH based on a conceptual rainfall-runoff model and GIS. ITC J 1997-1:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Singh RD, Seth SM (2000) Design flood estimation using GIS supported GIUH approach. Water Resour Manage 14:369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain V, Sinha R (2003) Derivation of unit hydrograph from GIUH analysis for a Himalayan river. Water Resour Manage 17:355–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirpich ZP (1940) Time of concentration of small agricultural watersheds. Civil Eng 10:362–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Chatterjee AK, Lohani AK, Kumar S, Singh RD (2002) Sensitivity analysis of the GIUH based Clark model for a catchments. Water Resour Manage 16:263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapp P, Madramootoo CA, Enright P, Papineau F, Perrone J (1998) Water quality of an intensive agricultural watershed in Quebec. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(2):427–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KT (1988) Generating design hydrographs by DEM assisted geomorphologic runoff simulation: A case study. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34(2):375–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MT, Blank D, Dellur JW (1972) A program for estimating runoff from Indiana watersheds, Part II. Assembly of hydrologic and geomorphologic data for small watersheds in Indiana. Tech Rep. No. 23, Purdue University, Water Resources Research Centre, Lafayette, Indiana

  • Maidment DR (1993) Developing a spatially distributed unit hydrograph by using GIS, In: Application of geographic information systems in hydrology and water resources management, IAHS Publication No. 211. IAHS Press, Institute of Hydrology, Wallingford, UK, pp 181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez V, Garcia AI, Ayuga F (2001) Distributed routing techniques developed on GIS for generating synthetic unit hydrograph. Trans ASAE 45(6):1825–1834

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuen R (1997) Hydrologic analysis and design, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzik I (1996) Flood modeling with GIS-derived distributed unit hydrograph. Hydrol Process 10:1401–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter DF, Kochel RC, Miller JR (2002) Process geomorphology. Mc Graw Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Valdes J (1979) The geomorphological structure of hydrologic response. Water Resour Res 15(6):1409–1420

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Gonzalez-Sanabria M, Bras R (1982) A geomorphoclimatic theory of the instantaneous unit hydrograph. Water Resour Res 18(4):877–886

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Iturbe I, Rinaldo A (1997) Fractal river basins. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero D, Madramootoo CA, Enright P (2002) Modelling the Hydrology of an Agricultural Watershed in Quebec using SLURP. Canadian Biosyst Eng 44:1.11:1.20

  • Sarangi A, Madramootoo CA, Enright P, Prahser SO, Patel RM (2005) Performance evaluation of ANN and geomorphology-based models for runoff and sediment yield prediction for a Canadian watershed. Curr Sci 89(12):2022–2033

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangi A, Madramootoo CA, Singh DK (2004) Development of ArcGIS assisted user interfaces for estimation of watershed morphologic parameters. J Soil Water Conserv 3(3/4):139–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh VP (1988) Hydrologic Systems: Rainfall-runoff modeling, vol. 1. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart J (1972) Channel networks. Adv Hydrosci 8:305–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorman AU (1995) Estimation of peak discharge using GIUH model in Saudi Arabia. J Water Resour Plann Manage 121(4):287–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative Analysis of Watershed Geomorphology. Trans Am Geophysic Union 38(6):913–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang C, Gupta V, Waymire E (1981) A geomorphologic synthesis of non-linearality in surface runoff. Water Resour Res 17:545–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Govindaraju R (2003) Geomorphology-based artificial neural networks (GANNs) for estimation of direct runoff over watersheds. J Hydrol 273:18–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Sarangi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sarangi, A., Madramootoo, C.A., Enright, P. et al. Evaluation of three unit hydrograph models to predict the surface runoff from a Canadian watershed. Water Resour Manage 21, 1127–1143 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9072-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9072-9

Keywords

Navigation