Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Formality of Informal Civil Society: Ukraine’s EuroMaidan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over a period of three months, starting in late 2013, Ukraine experienced a remarkable civic transformation. What started as peaceful protests largely consisting of young idealists, grew quickly into an organized yet decentralized social movement, a conglomeration of semi-formal initiatives, and a loosely defined network of related formal and informal organizations—a process that ultimately prompted significant political and social changes in Ukraine. This paper offers three case studies related to EuroMaidan to provide insight into the formal and informal dimensions of civil society, contrasting those with official designations. The discussion contributes to the long-debated question of the strength or weakness of civil society in the context of Eastern Europe and suggests directions for future research with regard to the conceptualization of civil society and our understanding of formality.

Résumé

Vers la fin de l’année 2013, l’Ukraine a vécu, sur une période de trois mois, une transformation civique remarquable. Ce qui avait débuté comme des protestations pacifiques menées par de jeunes idéalistes s’est rapidement transformé en un mouvement social organisé, quoique décentralisé, un conglomérat d’initiatives semi-formelles et un réseau lâchement défini d’organismes formels et informels apparentés; un processus qui a ultimement provoqué des changements politiques et sociaux importants en Ukraine. Cet article présente trois études de cas concernant l’EuroMaidan pour informer sur les dimensions formelles et informelles de la société civile, qui s’opposent à celles accompagnées de désignations officielles. La discussion concerne la question longuement débattue de la force ou la faiblesse de la société civile dans le contexte de l’Europe de l’Est, et suggère des voies de recherche future sur la conceptualisation de la société civile et notre compréhension du concept de formalité.

Zusammenfassung

Ende 2013 erlebte die Ukraine über einen Zeitraum von drei Monaten eine bemerkenswerte zivilgesellschaftliche Transformation. Was mit friedlichen Protesten von weitgehend jungen Idealisten begann, entwickelte sich schnell zu einer organisierten, wenn auch dezentralisierten, sozialen Bewegung, einer Anhäufung semi-formeller Initiativen und einem ungenau definierten Netzwerk verbundender formeller und informeller Organisationen—ein Prozess, der letztendlich bedeutende politische und soziale Änderungen in der Ukraine herbeiführte. Der vorliegende Beitrag zeigt drei Fallstudien zum EuroMaidan, um einen Einblick in die formellen und informellen Dimensionen der Bürgergesellschaft zu geben, wobei diese den offiziellen Bezeichnungen gegenübergestellt werden. Die Diskussion ist ein Beitrag zur seit langem debattierten Frage über die Stärke bzw. Schwäche der Bürgergesellschaft im osteuropäischen Kontext. Es werden Leitfäden für zukünftige Forschungsarbeiten vorgeschlagen mit Hinblick auf die Konzeptualisierung der Bürgergesellschaft und unser Verständnis von Formalität.

Resumen

A lo largo de un período de tres meses, que comenzó a finales de 2013, Ucrania experimentó una notable transformación cívica. Lo que comenzó como protestas pacíficas consistentes en gran medida de jóvenes idealistas, se transformó rápidamente en un movimiento social organizado descentralizado, una conglomeración de iniciativas semiformales, y una red definida de manera laxa de organizaciones formales e informales relacionadas - un proceso que finalmente provocó cambios políticos y sociales significativos en Ucrania. El presente documento ofrece tres estudios de casos relacionados con EuroMaidan para proporcionar una mejor comprensión de las dimensiones formales e informales de la sociedad civil, que contrastan con las designadas oficialmente. El debate contribuye a la pregunta tan debatida de la fortaleza o debilidad de la sociedad civil en el contexto de Europa del Este, y sugiere directrices para investigaciones futuras con respecto a la conceptualización de la sociedad civil y nuestra comprensión de la formalidad.

从2013年晚些时候开始,乌克兰在三个月的时间内经历了极大的公民转换。主要由年轻理想主义者组成的安静抗议开始,这快速发展至有组织、但仍分散的社会运动,半正式计划的组合,以及相关正式和非正式组织的松散定义的网络—这一流程最终促进乌克兰的极大政治和社会变革。本文提供与亲欧盟示威相关的三个案例研究,从而获取民间团体的正式和非正式维度洞察,与官方定义形成对比。这一讨论有助于长期存在争议的问题,即民间团体在东欧背景中的优势和缺点,同时建议未来研究有关民间团体概念化的方向和对正式性的了解。

على مدى فترة ثلاثة أشهر، إبتداءا” من أواخر عام 2013، شهدت أوكرانيا تحول مدني ملحوظ. الذي بدأ بإحتجاجات سلمية على أنها تتكون في معظمها من مثاليين من الشباب، نمت بسرعة إلى حركة منظمة بعد اللامركزية الإجتماعية، مجموعة من المبادرات شبه الرسمية، وخليط شبكة تعريفها بشكل عام من الرسمية وغير الرسمية ذات الصلة بمنظمات - الإجراءات التي دفعت في نهاية المطاف أهمية التغييرات السياسية والإجتماعية في أوكرانيا. يقدم هذا البحث ثلاثة دراسات حالة متعلقة بالميدان الأوروبي لتوفير نظرة ثاقبة على الأبعاد الرسمية والغير الرسمية في المجتمع المدني، تلك المتناقضة مع التسميات الرسمية. المناقشة تساهم في جدال طويل لقوة أو ضعف المجتمع المدني في سياق شرق أوروبا، وتشير إتجاهات البحوث في المستقبل فيما يتعلق بمفهوم المجتمع المدني وفهمنا للإجراء الشكلي.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Originally, a Cossack military unit in the Zaporizhzhya Sich (Ukraine), the term Sotnya literally translates from Ukrainian as “one hundred.” It roughly denotes “company” in military terms. Many informal organizations on Maidan popularly called themselves Sotnyas, and most defense units utilized that name adding to it either a number or a thematic or geographic designation. St. Michael’s Movement, before it adopted this name, first termed themselves the Mykhailivska (St. Michael’s) Sotnya.

References

  • Aliaksandrau, A. (2014). Brave new war. Index on Censorship, 43(4), 56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aliyev, H. (2015). Post-Soviet informality: Towards theory-building. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35(3/4), 182–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beichelt, T., Hahn-Fuhr, I., Schimmelfennig, F., & Worschech, S. (Eds.). (2014). Civil society and democracy promotion. Hampshire, England: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berenson, M. (2010). Less Fear, Little Trust: Deciphering the Whys of Ukrainian Tax Compliance. In P. D’Anieri (Ed.), Orange Revolution and Aftermath: Mobilization, Apathy, and the State in Ukraine. Washington, D.C: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boris, E. T. (1999). The nonprofit sector in the 1990s. In C. T. Clotfelter & T. Ehrlich (Eds.), Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America (pp. 1–33). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Cleary, L. (2016). Half measures and incomplete reforms: the breeding ground for a hybrid civil society in Ukraine. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 16(1), 7–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comas, J. P., Shrivastava, J. P., & Martin, E. (2015). Terrorism as organization, network and social movement. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24, 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Anieri, P. (Ed.). (2010). Orange Revolution and the aftermath: mobilization, apathy, and the state in Ukraine. Washington, D.C: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeHoog, R. & Racanska, H. (2001). Democratization, civil society, and nonprofits: Comparing the Czech and Slovak Republics. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute, Working Paper Series.

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekiert, G., & Kubik, J. (2014). Myths and Realities of Civil Society. Journal of Democracy, 25(1), 46–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, M. W., & Edwards, B. (1996). The Paradox of Civil Society. Journal of Democracy, 7(3), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedom House. (2007, 2011), “Freedom in the World.” Retrieved January 25, 2016 from http://www.freedomhouse.org/report-types/freedom-world#.UtMtYfRDvBY.

  • Fukuyama, F. (2010). Social capital, civil society and development. Third World Quarterly, 22(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatskova, K., & Gatskov, M. (2016). Third sector in Ukraine: Civic engagement before and after the Euromaidan. Voluntas, 27(2), 673–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. R. (2013). Civil society: Theory, history, comparison. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, C. (2013). Organizing spaces: Meeting arenas as a social movement infrastructure between organization, network, and institution. Organization Studies, 34(5–6), 705–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayoz, N. (2015). Cultures of informality and networks of power in post-Soviet non-democracies. In R. Beunen et al. (Eds.), Evolutionary governance theory. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. M. (2003). The weakness of civil society in post-communist Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krasynska, S. (2015). Contra spem spero: The third sector’s resilience in the face of political turbulence and legislative change in Ukraine. Nonprofit Policy Forum, 6(2), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratochvil, A. & Scheide, C. (2014), “EuroMaidan. Chronology of Events,” Online Journal of the Center for Governance and Culture in Europe, Vol. 13/2014. St. Gallen, Switzerland: University of St. Gallen. Retrieved August 25, 2014 from www.gce.unisg.ch.

  • Kuti, E. (2004). Civic service in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: From mandatory public work toward civic service. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(4-suppl), 79S–97S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuts, S., & Palyvoda, L. (2006). “Civil society in Ukraine: ‘Driving engine or spare wheel for change’?” CIVICUS Civil Society Index Report for Ukraine. Kyiv: Center for Philanthropy and Counterpart Creative Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzio, T. (2012). Twenty years as an independent state: Ukraine’s ten logical inconsistencies. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 45(3–4), 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljubownikow, S., & Crotty, J. (2014). Civil Society in a transitional context: The response of health and educational NGOs to legislative changes in Russia’s industrialized regions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(4), 759–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ljubownikow, S., Crotty, J., & Rodgers, P. (2013). The state and civil society in post-soviet Russia: The development of a Russian-style civil society. Progress in Development Studies, 13(2), 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marples, D. R. (2015). Introduction. In D. R. Marples & F. V. Mills (Eds.), Ukraine’s Euromaidan: Analyses of a Civil Revolution (pp. 9–26). Stuttgart, New York: ibidem Verlag, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel, S. (2009). Are private government, the nonprofit sector and civil society the same thing? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(4), 717–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minakov, M. (2014). Cooperation and competition between civil society organizations, the ruling elites and the oligarchs after Maidan 2014. Forum of newest Eastern European History and Culture, 2, 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell, B. (2000). Civil society: Definitions and descriptions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(3), 471–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onuch, O. (2014). Who were the protesters? Journal of Democracy, 25(3), 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onuch, O. (2015). Maidans past and present: Comparing the orange revolution and the Euromaidan. In D. R. Marples & F. V. Mills (Eds.), Ukraine’s Euromaidan: Analyses of a Civil Revolution (pp. 27–56). Stuttgart, New York: ibidem Verlag, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OSCE PA [Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Parliamentary Assembly] (2014), “Ukraine parliament votes to overturn draconian anti-protest laws,” OSCE PA in the News, January 29. Retrieved January 22, 2016 from http://www.oscepa.org/news-a-media/osce-pa-in-the-news/1496-ukraine-parliament-votes-to-overturn-draconian-anti-protest-laws.

  • Richter, J. (2002). Promoting Civil Society? Democracy assistance and Russian Women’s Organizations. Problems of Post Communism, 49(1), 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. & Anheier, H. (1996), “Social Origins of Civil Society: Explaining the Nonprofit Sector Cross-Nationally.” Working Paper. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Institute for Policy Studies.

  • Shneider, F., Buehn, A., & Montenegro, C. F. (2011). Shadow economies all over the world: new estimates for 162 countries from 1999 to 2007. In F. Shneider (Ed.), Handbook on the shadow economy. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Solohub, V. (2014), “Rising star of Ukrainian politics,” CNN iReport. Retrieved October 29, 2014 from http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-1098123.

  • Sotiropoulos, D. A. (2004). Formal weakness and informal strength: Civil Society in Contemporary Greece (p. 16). Discussion Paper No: The London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, S. (2011). Culture as structure in emerging civic organizations in Russia. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40(6), 1073–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepanenko, V. P. (2015), “Konfihuratzii Panuvannya ta Sprotyvu v Konteksti Instytutzionalnyh Osoblyvostej Rozvytku Hromadyantskoho Suspilstva v Ukraïni” [Configurations of Power and Resistance in the Context of Institutional Idiosyncrasies of Civil Society Development in Ukraine]. Presentation at the International Academic-Practitioner Conference (November 26–27, 2015), “Derzhava ta hlobalni socialni zminy: istorychna sotziolohiya panuvannya ta sprotyvu v epohu modernu” [The State and Global Social Change: Historic Sociology of Power and Resistance in the Modern Age]. Kyiv: Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. Retrieved February 28, 2016 from http://www.sociology.kpi.ua/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Збipкa_тeз_Дepжaвa_2015.pdf.

  • Stewart, S. (2009). NGO Development in Ukraine since the Orange Revolution. In J. Besters-Dilger (Ed.), Ukraine on its Way to Europe: Interim Results of the Orange Revolution (pp. 177–194). Frankfurt, Germany: Peter Lang.

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sviatnenko, S., & Vinogradov, A. (2014). Euromaidan values from a comparative perspective. Social, Health, and Communication Studies Journal, 1(1), 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. C., & Onoschenko, O. (2014), “The diverse livelihood practices of healthcare workers in Ukraine: the case of Sasha and Natasha.” In The informal post-Soviet economy. Embedded practices and livelihoods, J. Morris, & A. Polese (Eds.). London and New York: Routledge.

  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svitlana Krasynska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krasynska, S., Martin, E. The Formality of Informal Civil Society: Ukraine’s EuroMaidan. Voluntas 28, 420–449 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9819-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9819-8

Keywords

Navigation