Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of Nonprofit Sector Density: A Stakeholder Approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Why do nonprofit organizations exist? From an economic perspective, a number of major theories have been proposed to explain their existence. However, when exploring determinants of nonprofit sector density, one needs to take into account that demand and supply factors operate simultaneously and that it is difficult to separate them. By using a stakeholder approach, we develop a more integrative framework for understanding variations in nonprofit sector density. We test this framework by investigating determinants of nonprofit sector density in Texas at the county level.

Résumé

Pourquoi les organismes sans but lucratif existent-ils ? D’un point de vue économique, un nombre de théories d’envergure ont été proposées pour justifier leur existence. Cependant, lors de l’évaluation des déterminants de la densité du secteur des activités sans but lucratif, on doit tenir compte du fait que la demande et l’approvisionnement opèrent en simultané. Les séparer n’est donc pas une mince tâche. En adoptant l’approche d’un intervenant, nous avons mis sur pied un cadre de travail plus intégratif pour comprendre les écarts de densité du secteur des activités sans but lucratif. Nous l’avons testé en évaluant les déterminants de la densité du secteur du Texas au niveau du comté.

Zusammenfassung

Warum existieren gemeinnützige Organisationen? Von einer ökonomischen Perspektive aus wurden bislang mehrere wichtige Theorien vorgeschlagen, um ihre Existenz zu erklären. Wenn man allerdings die Determinaten der Dichte des gemeinnützigen Sektors untersucht, muss man berücksichtigen, dass die Angebots- und Nachfragefaktoren gleichzeitig operieren und es schwierig ist, sie zu trennen. Mittels eines Stakeholder-Ansatzes entwickeln wir ein integrativeres Rahmenwerk zum Verständnis der Abweichungen in der Dichte des gemeinnützigen Sektors. Wir testen das Rahmenwerk, indem wir die Determinanten für die Dichte des gemeinnützigen Sektors in Texas auf der County-Ebene untersuchen.

Resumen

¿Por qué existen las organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro? Desde una perspectiva económica, se han propuesto una serie de importantes teorías para explicar su existencia. Sin embargo, cuando se exploran los determinantes de la densidad del sector de organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro, es necesario tomar en cuenta que los factores de oferta y demanda operan simultáneamente y que es difícil separarlos. Mediante el uso de un enfoque basado en las partes interesadas, desarrollamos un marco más integrador para comprender las variaciones en la densidad del sector de organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro. Ponemos a prueba este marco mediante la investigación de los determinantes de la densidad del sector de organizaciones sin ánimo de lucro en Tejas a nivel de condado.

摘要

非营利性组织因何而存在?许多主要理论已经从经济角度解释了它们存在的原因。然而,在探究决定非营利性部门的密度的因素之时,我们需要考虑需求与供应因素,这两个因素同时起作用,而且探究过程中很难将它们分开。通过运用利益相关者的方法,我们为理解影响非营利性部门密度的变化因素建立了一个更为综合性的框架。在得克萨斯州各县,我们通过调查非营利性部门密度的决定因素而对此框架进行了测试。

ملخص

لماذا توجد المنظمات الغير ربحية؟ من منظور إقتصادي، تم إقتراح عدد من النظريات الرئيسية لتفسير وجودها. مع ذلك، عندما يتم إكتشاف العوامل المحددة لكثافة القطاع الغير هادف للربح، يحتاج المرء إلى أن يأخذ في الاعتبار أن عوامل العرض والطلب تعملان في وقت واحد وأنه من الصعب الفصل بينهما. بإستخدام نهج أصحاب المصلحة، ونحن نضع إطار إلى حد بعيد تكاملي لفهم التغيرات في كثافة القطاع الغير ربحي. نحن نفحص هذا الإطار من خلال التحقيق في محددات كثافة القطاع الغير ربحي في ولاية تكساس على مستوى المقاطعة.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abzug, R., & Turnheim, J. K. (1998). Bandwagon or band-aid? A model of nonprofit incorporation by state. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(3), 300–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anheier, H. K., & Ben-Ner, A. (2003). The study of nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J. E. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badelt, C. (1997). Entrepreneurship theories of the non-profit sector. Voluntas, 8(2), 162–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ner, A. (2002). The shifting boundaries of the mixed economy and the future of the nonprofit sector. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73(1), 5–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ner, A., & Van Hoomissen, T. (1991). Nonprofit organizations in the mixed economy: A demand and supply analysis. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62(4), 519–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ner, A., & Van Hoomissen, T. (1992). An empirical investigation of the joint determination of the size of the for-profit, nonprofit, and government sectors. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 63(3), 391–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilodeau, M., & Slivinski, A. (1996). Volunteering nonprofit entrepreneurial services. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(1), 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilodeau, M., & Slivinski, A. (1998). Rational nonprofit entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 7(4), 551–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. A., Jo, S., Andersson, F. O. (2013). Texas Nonprofit Sector: Describing the Size and Scope. Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

  • Chan, J., To, H.-P., & Chan, E. (2006). Reconsidering social cohesion: Developing a definition and analytical framework for empirical research. Social Indicators Research, 75(2), 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, C., Witesman, E. M., & Braudt, D. B. (2015). Sector choice: How fair trade entrepreneurs choose between nonprofit and for-profit firms. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(4), 832–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J. J. (1999). A study of factors influencing the growth of nonprofits in social services. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28(3), 296–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (2001). Enterprising nonprofits. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J., & Sinclair Colman, M. (2006). Collaboration between corporations and nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.). New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grønbjerg, K. A., & Paarlberg, L. (2001). Community variations in the size and scope of the nonprofit sector: Theory and preliminary findings. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 684–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handy, F. (1997). Coexistence of nonprofit, for-profit and public sector institutions. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 68(2), 201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. B. (1987). Economic theories of nonprofit organization. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. E. (2012). Nonprofits and business: Toward a subfield of nonprofit studies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(5), 892–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirth, R. A. (1999). Consumer information and competition between nonprofit and for-profit nursing homes. Journal of Health Economics, 18(2), 219–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, E. (1987). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In W. W. Powell (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, E. (1993). Why do different countries choose a different public-private mix of educational services? Journal of Human Resources, 28(3), 571–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jegers, M. (2008). Managerial economics of non-profit organizations. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. (2015). Socioeconomic diversity, political engagement, and the density of nonprofit organizations in U.S. counties. American Review of Public Administration, 45(4), 402–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kingma, B. R. (1997). Public good theories of the non-profit sector: Weisbrod revisited. Voluntas, 8(2), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecy, J. D., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2013). Nonprofit sector growth and density: Testing theories of government support. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 189–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuello, C. (1998). Determinants of the non-profit sector size: An empirical analysis in Spain. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 69(2), 175–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga, Y., & Yamauchi, N. (2004). Is the government failure theory still relevant? A panel analysis using US state level data. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 75(2), 227–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga, Y., Yamauchi, N., & Okuyama, N. (2010). What determines the size of the nonprofit sector? A cross-country analysis of the government failure theory. Voluntas, 21, 180–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Regan, K. M., & Oster, S. M. (2000). Nonprofit and for-profit partnerships: Rationale and challenges of cross-sector contracting. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 120–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, A., & Schlesinger, M. (1997). Trust, repute and the role of non-profit enterprise. Voluntas, 8(2), 97–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 29–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9(3), 213–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G., & Benson, M. (2005). Social capital and the growth of the nonprofit sector. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 16–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speckbacher, G. (2008). Nonprofit versus corporate governance: An economic approach. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18(3), 295–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. (2006). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.). New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, D. M., & Hart, T. A. (2008). Perceived institutional ambiguity and the choice of organizational form in social entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 685–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuckman, H. P., & Chang, C. F. (1988). Cost convergence between for-profit and not-for-profit nursing homes: Does competition matter? Quarterly Review of Economics and Business, 28(4), 50–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Puyvelde, S., Caers, R., Du Bois, C., & Jegers, M. (2012). The governance of nonprofit organizations: Integrating agency theory with stakeholder and stewardship theories. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1975). Toward a theory of the voluntary nonprofit sector in a three-sector economy. In E. S. Phelps (Ed.), Altruism, morality and economic theory. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. R. (1983). If not for profit, for what?. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. R. (2013). If Not for Profit, for What?, George State University 2013 Faculty Books. Book 1. http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/facbooks2013/1.

Download references

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 11th International Conference of the International Society for Third-Sector Research (ISTR) in Münster, Germany, July 22–25, 2014. We would like to thank Woods Bowman, Marc Jegers, and Lester Salamon for their useful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stijn Van Puyvelde.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Van Puyvelde, S., Brown, W.A. Determinants of Nonprofit Sector Density: A Stakeholder Approach. Voluntas 27, 1045–1063 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9656-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9656-1

Keywords

Navigation