Abstract
The diversity of orchid species in semi-natural calcareous grassland is thought to depend on floral variability. However, differences in primary life-history strategy, or the overall suite of functional traits, could also affect coexistence. Both primary strategy (affecting day-to-day survival) and reproductive traits (representing periodic events) have been hypothesized to contribute to a general mechanism regulating the local persistence and relative abundance of species. We recorded species identity at 8,000 points at the centimetre scale along sixteen 5-m long transects at the Olive Lawn, a xeric sand calcareous grassland near Lecco, Italy. Transects allowed the relative abundance and spatial aggregation of Grime’s competitor, stress-tolerator, ruderal (CSR) strategies to be quantified. Orchid flowering and fruiting phenology was recorded alongside the phenology of graminoid growth. Seven orchid species were present and exhibited a spectrum of strategies spanning two extremes, (1) small early-flowering ruderals (R/CR-selected), and (2) larger-leaved competitors (C/CR) flowering later as dominant graminoids attained maximum height. These orchids, and other subordinate species in the community, exhibited random spatial distributions amongst dominant graminoids that exhibited a high degree of spatial aggregation and similar, but non-identical, stress-tolerator (S) strategies. The reproductive phenology of meadow orchids is an intimate component of their CSR strategies, and appears to promote coexistence by allowing segregation between temporal niches and the exploitation of opportunities between clumps of dominant species. Only for closely related species with identical CSR strategies, such as Ophrys benacensis and Ophrys sphegodes, could specific floral differences alone explain coexistence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arditti J (1992) Fundamentals of orchid biology. Wiley, New York
Armbruster WS, Edwards ME, Debevec EM (1994) Floral character displacement generates assemblage structure of Western Australian triggerplants (Stylidium). Ecology 75:315–329
Benzing DH, Atwood JT (1984) Orchidaceae: ancestral habitats and current status in forest canopies. Syst Bot 9:155–165
Cerabolini BEL, Brusa G, Ceriani RM, De Andreis R, Luzzaro A, Pierce S (2010) Can CSR classification be generally applied outside Britain? Plant Ecol 210:53–261
Cornelissen JHC, Lavorel S, Garnier E, Diaz S, Buchmann N et al (2003) A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 51:335–380
Cozzolino S, Widmer A (2005) Orchid diversity: an evolutionary consequence of deception? Trends Ecol Evol 20(9):487–494
Craine JM (2009) Resource strategies of wild plants. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Díaz S, Hodgson JG, Thompson K, Cabido M, Cornelissen JHC et al (2004) The plant traits that drive ecosystems: evidence from three continents. J Veg Sci 15:295–304
Dorland E, Willems JH (2006) High light availability alleviates the costs of reproduction in Ophrys insectifera (Orchidaceae). J Europäischer Orchideen 38(2):501–518
Dressler RL (1981) The orchids. Natural history and classification. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Elliott JM (1993) Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Scientific publication 25. Freshwater Biological Association, Ambleside
Fargione J, Tilman T (2006) Plant species traits and capacity for re source reduction predict yield and abundance under competition in nitrogen-limited grassland. Funct Ecol 20:533–540
Fitter AH (1982) Influence of soil heterogeneity on the coexistence of grassland species. J Ecol 70:139–148
Frenette-Dussault C, Shipley B, Léger J-F, Meziane D, Hingrat Y (2012) Functional structure of an arid steppe plant community reveals similarities with Grime’s C-S-R theory. J Veg Sci 23:208–222
Freschet GT, Aerts R, Cornelissen HC (2012) A plant economics spectrum of litter decomposability. Funct Ecol 26:56–65
Fridley JD, Grime JP, Askew AP, Moser B, Stevens CJ (2011) Soil heterogeneity buffers community response to climate change in species-rich grassland. Glob Change Biol 17:2002–2011
GIROS (Italian Group for Research on Spontaneous Orchids) (2009) Orchidee d’Italia (Orchids of Italy). Il Castello, Cornaredo (in Italian)
Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86:901–910
Grime JP (2001) Plant strategies, vegetation processes and ecosystem properties, 2nd edn. Wiley, Chichester, p 417
Grime JP, Pierce S (2012) The evolutionary strategies that shape ecosystems. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester
Guidi V (2011) Study of the biodiversity of native orchids in the province of Lecco. Unpublished BSc thesis, University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, p 81
Hutchings MJ (1987) The population biology of the early spider orchid, Ophrys sphegodes Mill. I. Demographic study from 1975 to 1984. J Ecol 75(3):711–727
Hutchings MJ, Mendoza A, Havers W (1998) Demographic properties of an outlier population of Orchis militaris L. (Orchidaceae) in England. Bot J Linn Soc 126:95–107
Jacquemyn H, Brys R, Honnay O, Hermy M (2008) Effects of coppicing on demographic structure, fruit and seed set in Orchis mascula. Basic Appl Ecol 9:392–400
Kullenberg B (1950) Investigations on the pollination of Ophrys species. Oikos 2(1):1–19
Martin EM (1996) Fitness costs of resource overlap among coexisting bird species. Nature 380:338–340
Otero JP, Ackerman JD, Bayman P (2002) Diversity and host specificity of endophytic Rhizoctonia-like fungi from tropical orchids. Am J Bot 89(11):1852–1858
Pärtel M, Kalamees R, Zobel M, Rosén E (1998) Restoration of species-rich limestone grassland communities from overgrown land: the importance of propagule availability. Ecol Eng 10:275–286
Pedersen HÆ, Faurholdt M (2007) Ophrys: the bee orchids of Europe. Kew Publishing, London
Pierce S, Ceriani RM, Villa M, Cerabolini B (2006) Quantifying relative extinction risks and targeting intervention for the orchid flora of a natural park in the European pre-alps. Conserv Biol 20(6):1804–1810
Pierce S, Luzzaro A, Caccianiga M, Ceriani RM, Cerabolini B (2007) Disturbance is the principal α-scale filter determining niche differentiation, coexistence and biodiversity in an alpine community. J Ecol 95:698–706
Pierce S, Brusa G, Vagge I, Cerabolini BEL (2013) Allocating CSR plant functional types: the use of leaf economics and size traits to classify woody and herbaceous vascular plants. Funct Ecol 27(4):1002–1010
Pignatti S (1982) Flora d’Italia. Edagricole, Bologna
Rasmussen HN (2002) Recent developments in the study of orchid mycorrhiza. Plant Soil 244:149–163
Rathcke BJ (1983) Competition and facilitation among plants for pollination. In: Real L (ed) Pollination Biology. Academic Press, New York, pp 305–329
Reynolds HL, Hungate BA, Chapin FS, D’Antonio CM (1997) Soil heterogeneity and plant competition in an annual grassland. Ecology 78:2076–2090
Schlüter PM, Ruas PM, Kohl G, Ruas CF, Stuessy TF, Paulus HF (2009) Genetic patterns and pollination in Ophrys iricolor and O. mesaritica (Orchidaceae): sympatric evolution by pollinator shift. Bot J Linn Soc 159:583–598
Scopece G, Musacchio A, Widmer A, Cozzolino S (2007) Patterns of reproductive isolation in Mediterranean deceptive orchids. Evolution 61(11):2623–2642
Silvera K, Santiago LS, Winter K (2005) Distribution of crassulacean acid metabolism in orchids of Panama: evidence of selection for weak and strong modes. Funct Plant Biol 32:397–407
Soliva M, Widmer A (2003) Gene flow across species boundaries in sympatric, sexually deceptive Ophrys (Orchidaceae) species. Evolution 57(10):2252–2261
Tilman D (1988) Plant Strategies and the Dynamics and Structure of Plant Communities. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Vereecken NJ, Cozzolino S, Schiestl FP (2010) Hybrid floral scent novelty drives pollinator shift in sexually deceptive orchids. BMC Evol Biol 10:103
Waser NM (1983) Competition for pollination and floral characters differences among sympatric species: a review of evidence. In: Jones DE, Little RJ (eds) Handbook of experimental pollination biology. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 277–293
Waterman RT, Bidartondo MI, Stofberg J, Combs JK, Gebauer G, Savolainen V, Barraclough TG, Pauw A (2011) The effects of above- and below-ground mutualisms on orchid speciation and coexistence. Am Nat 177(2):E54–E68
Wells TCE, Rothery P, Cox R, Bamford S (1998) Flowering dynamics of Orchis morio L. and Herminium monorchis (L.) R.Br. at two sites in eastern England. Bot J Linn Soc 126:39–48
Wright IJ, Reich PB, Westoby M et al (2004) The worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Nature 428:821–827
Acknowledgments
We thank Salvatore Valsecchi (the owner of the fieldsite) the Native Flora Centre of the Lombardy Region (CFA) and Parco Monte Barro (acting on behalf of the Lombardy Region) for permission to work at the site and collect plant material, and for access to the equipment and laboratory at Monte Barro where leaf area and weight were determined. Pierfranco Arrigoni originally made the authors aware of the presence of the orchids at the site.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Satoki Sakai.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pierce, S., Vagge, I., Brusa, G. et al. The intimacy between sexual traits and Grime’s CSR strategies for orchids coexisting in semi-natural calcareous grassland at the Olive Lawn. Plant Ecol 215, 495–505 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0318-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0318-y