Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Testing non-additive effects of nectar-robbing ants and hummingbird pollination on the reproductive success of a parasitic plant

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nectar robbing may have an indirect negative effect on plant reproduction by discouraging legitimate pollinator species from visiting robbed flowers. In this study, we set up a 2 × 2 factorial design with nectar-robbing ants and hummingbird pollination to test for non-additive effects on fruit set, seed mass, and seed germination of the leafless mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus (Loranthaceae). Even though ants caused conspicuous damage at the base of the floral tubes, nectar availability was reduced by only 8 % in the presence of ants. The green-backed firecrown Sephanoides sephaniodes was insensitive to the presence of ants. Rather, the bird responded to flower number and the presence or the absence of damage, but not to the extent of damage within inflorescences. As hummingbirds were largely insensitive to variation in nectar robbing, the interaction ant × hummingbird had no effect on plant-reproductive success. Thus, the factorial experiment did not provide evidence for indirect negative effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction. These results suggest that indirect effects of nectar robbers on pollinator behaviour may occur under a more restricted set of conditions than those previously considered. We suggest that the low amount of nectar removed by nectar-robbing ants was insufficient for hummingbirds to avoid robbed flowers, which restricted the potential for non-additive effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arizmendi MC, Domínguez CA, Dirzo R (1996) The role of an avian nectar robber and of hummingbird pollinators in the reproduction of two plant species. Funct Ecol 10:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botto-Mahan C, Ramírez PA, Ossa CG, Ojeda-Camacho M, Medel R, González AV (2011) Floral herbivory affects female reproductive success and pollinator visitation in the perennial herb Alstroemeria ligtu (Alstroemeriaceae). Int J Plant Sci 172:1130–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkle LA, Irwin RE, Newman DA (2007) Predicting the effects of nectar robbing on plant reproduction: implications of pollen limitation and plant mating system. Am J Bot 94:1935–1943

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carduel YJ, Koptur S (2010) Effects of florivory on the pollination of flowers: an experimental field study with a perennial plant. Int J Plant Sci 171:283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro S, Silveira P, Navarro L (2008) Consequences of nectar robbing for the fitness of a threatened plant species. Plant Ecol 199:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (1995) Effects of nectar consumption by the hummingbird flower mite Proctolaelaps kirmsei on nectar availability in Hamelia patens. Biotropica 27:206–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danderson CA, Molano-Flores B (2010) Effects of herbivory and inflorescence size on insect visitation to Eryngium yuccifolium (Apiaceae) a prairie plant. Am Midl Nat 163:234–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudash MR, Hassler C, Stevens PM, Fenster CB (2011) Experimental floral and inflorescence trait manipulations affect pollinator preference and function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant. Am J Bot 98:275–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd edn. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenster CB, Cheely G, Dudash MR, Reynold RJ (2006) Nectar reward and advertisement in hummingbird-pollinated Silene virginica (Caryophyllaceae). Am J Bot 93:1800–1807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frazee J, Marquis R (1994) Environmental contribution to floral trait variation in Chamaecrista fasciculata. Am J Bot 81:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galen C (1983) The effects of nectar thieving ants on seed set in floral scent morphs of Polemonium viscosum. Oikos 41:245–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galen C, Butchart B (2003) Ants in your plants: effects of nectar-thieves on pollen fertility and seed-siring capacity in the alpine wildflower, Polemonium viscosum. Oikos 101:521–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galen C, Cuba J (2001) Down the tube: pollinators, predators, and the evolution of flower shape in the alpine skypilot, Polemonium viscosum. Evolution 55:1963–1971

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzáles WL, Suarez LH, Medel R (2007) Outcrossing increases infection success in the holoparasitic mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus (Loranthaceae). Evol Ecol 21:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Gómez PL, Valdivia CE (2005) Direct and indirect effects of nectar robbing on the pollinating behavior of Patagona gigas (Trochilidae). Biotropica 37:693–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Gómez PL, Vásquez RA (2006) A field study of spatial memory in green-backed firecrown hummingbirds (Sephanoides sephaniodes). Ethology 112:790–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández HM, Toledo VM (1979) The role of nectar robbers and pollinators in the reproduction of Erythrina leptorhiza. Ann MO Bot Gard 66:512–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM, Herrera J, Espadaler X (1984) Nectar thievery by ants from southern Spanish insect-pollinated flowers. Insectes Soc 31:142–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inouye DW (1980) The terminology of floral larceny. Ecology 61:1251–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE (2000) Hummingbird avoidance of nectar-robbed plants: spatial location or visual cues? Oikos 91:499–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Brody AK (1998) Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness. Oecologia 116:519–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Brody AK (1999) Nectar-robbing bumblebees reduce the fitness of Ipomopsis agreggata (Polemoniaceae). Ecology 80:1703–1712

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Brody AK (2000) Consequences of nectar robbing for realized male function in a hummingbird-pollinated plant. Ecology 81:2637–2643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Brody AK, Waser MN (2001) The impact of floral larceny on individuals, populations, and communities. Oecologia 129:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Bronstein JL, Manson JS, Richardson L (2010) Nectar robbing: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:271–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaksic FM (2001) Ecological effects of El Niño in terrestrial ecosystems of Western South America. Ecography 24:241–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Karban R, Strauss SY (1993) Effects of herbivores on growth and reproduction of their perennial host, Erigeron glaucus. Ecology 74:39–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjonaas C, Rengifo C (2006) Differential effects of avian nectar-robbing on fruit set of two Venezuelan Andean cloud forest plants. Biotropica 38:276–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick GA, Weis AE, Campbell DR (1999) The consequences of floral herbivory for pollinator service to Isomeris arborea. Ecology 80:125–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijt J (1969) The biology of parasitic flowering plants. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Lach L (2005) Interference and exploitation competition of three nectar-thieving invasive ant species. Insectes Soc 52:257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lara C, Ornelas JF (2001) Nectar “theft” by hummingbird flower mites and its consequences for seed set in Moussonia deppeana. Funct Ecol 15:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman DJ, Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (1996) Impact of floral herbivory by parsnip webworm (Oecophoridae: Depressaria pastinacella Duponchel) on pollination and fitness of wild parsnip (Apiaceae: Pastinaca sativa L.). Am Midl Nat 136:407–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloof JE (2001) The effects of a bumble bee nectar robber on plant-reproductive success and pollinator behavior. Am J Bot 88:1960–1965

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maloof JE, Inouye WD (2000) Are nectar robbers cheaters or mutualists? Ecology 81:2651–2661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauseth JD, Montenegro G, Walckowiak AM (1984) Studies of the holoparasitic mistletoe Tristerix aphyllus (Loranthaceae) infecting Trichocereus chilensis (Cactaceae). Can J Bot 62:847–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauseth JD, Montenegro G, Walckowiak AM (1985) Host infection and flower formation by the parasite Tristerix aphyllus (Loranthaceae). Can J Bot 63:567–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall AC, Irwin RE (2006) Florivory: the intersection of pollination and herbivory. Ecol Lett 9:1351–1365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDade LA, Kinsman S (1980) The impact of floral parasitism in two neotropical hummingbird-pollinated plant species. Evolution 34:944–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medel R, Botto-Mahan C, Smith-Ramirez C, Méndez MA, Ossa CG, Caputo L, Gonzales LW (2002) Historia natural cuantitativa de una relación parásito-hospedero: el sistema Tristerix-cactáceas en Chile semiárido. Rev Chil Hist Nat 75:127–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo AM, Ackerman JD (1987) Limitations to fruit production in Ionopsis utricularioides (Orchidaceae). Biotropica 19:24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris WF (1996) Mutualism denied? Nectar-robbing bumble bees do not reduce female or male success of bluebells. Ecology 77:1451–1462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro L (2000) Pollination ecology of Anthyllis vulneraria subsp. vulgaris (Fabaceae): nectar robbers as pollinators. Am J Bot 87:980–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norment CJ (1988) The effect of nectar-thieving ants on the reproductive success of Frasera speciosa (Gentianaceae). Am Midl Nat 120:331–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl N, Carvallo G, Botto-Mahan C, Medel R (2006) Non-additive effects of flower damage and hummingbird pollination on the fecundity of Mimulus luteus. Oecologia 149:648–655

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson S (2004) Are nectar-robbers mutualists or antagonists? Oecologia 139:246–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Robles JA, Meléndez EJ, Ackerman JD (1992) Effects of display size, flowering phenology, and nectar availability on effective visitation frequency in Comparettia falcata (Orchidaceae). Am J Bot 79:1009–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero GQ (2002) Protection of Vochysia elliptica (Vochysiaceae) by a nectar-thieving ant. Braz J Biol 62:371–373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW (1982) The ecological impact of nectar-robbing bees and pollinating hummingbirds on a tropical shrub. Ecology 63:354–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Ramírez C (1999) Selección fenotípica secuencial sobre rasgos reproductivos del muérdago Tristerix aphyllus. PhD Thesis. Universidad de Chile

  • Wyatt R (1980) The impact of nectar-robbing ants on the pollination system of Asclepias curassavica. Bull Torrey Bot Club 107:24–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YW, Yang CF, Zhao JM, Guo YH (2009) Selective nectar robbing in a gynodioecious plant (Glechoma longituba) enhances female advantage. J Evol Biol 22:527–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M, Cook S (1985) Pollinator foraging, experimental nectar robbing and plant fitness in Impatiens capensis. Am Midl Nat 113:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

CONAF IV Región authorized the above study at Las Chinchillas National Reserve. This study was funded by FONDECYT Grants 1010660 and 1120155.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratorio de Ecología Evolutiva, LID, Facultad de Ciencias y Filosofía, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru

    Wilfredo L. Gonzáles

  2. Departamento de Ciencias Ecológicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Casilla 653, Santiago, Chile

    Paula Caballero, Carmen G. Ossa, Catalina González-Browne, Guadalupe Astorga, Maureen M. Murúa & Rodrigo Medel

Authors
  1. Paula Caballero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carmen G. Ossa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wilfredo L. Gonzáles
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Catalina González-Browne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Guadalupe Astorga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Maureen M. Murúa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rodrigo Medel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Medel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Caballero, P., Ossa, C.G., Gonzáles, W.L. et al. Testing non-additive effects of nectar-robbing ants and hummingbird pollination on the reproductive success of a parasitic plant. Plant Ecol 214, 633–640 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-013-0195-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-013-0195-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation