Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Defining plant functional groups to guide rare plant management

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To effectively manage plant populations for conservation, there is a need to provide reliable information on the conditions required for maintaining viable populations. This is particularly true for the management of populations of rare plant taxa. Western Australia contains over 45% of Australia’s gazetted rare or threatened flora, 80% of which are found within the highly fragmented southwest region. Resources do not exist to undertake comprehensive studies on the population dynamics and demographics for every rare plant of this diverse region. Here, we describe a method of classifying rare plant taxa into functional groups as a basis for guiding rare flora conservation and management. Data on four floral and two life-history traits were collected for each of the 351 declared rare flora taxa of Western Australia. A hierarchical, agglomerative clustering method was applied to the resulting taxa by traits matrix to extract emergent groupings of plant taxa. The resulting polythetic groups were analysed to determine the variation in traits, including response to disturbance and recorded flower visitors, and how these may affect population persistence in a fragmented landscape. Multivariate methods were used to define emergent groups based on a combination of floral structure and life-history traits of the declared rare flora of Western Australia. Seven emergent functional groups were identified and were largely differentiated by flower shape and life form. These seven functional groupings varied significantly in their response to disturbance. By deriving these functional groups, we plan to develop models for each group on how rates of pollination, seed production and seed fitness are affected by population size and landscape context. The rationale would be to use these profiles to determine whether there are thresholds in population size or position in the landscape at which reproductive rates severely decline. General management guidelines could then be developed for each functional group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DRF:

Declared rare flora

SWAFR:

Southwest Australian Floristic Region

References

  • Aizen MA, Feinsinger P (1994) Forest fragmentation, pollination, and plant reproduction in a Chaco dry forest, Argentina. Ecology 75:330–351. doi:10.2307/1939538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blondel J (2003) Guilds or functional groups: does it matter? Oikos 100:223–231. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12152.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond WJ (1994) Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B 344:83–90. doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradstock RA, Kenny BJ (2003) An application of plant functional types to fire management in a conservation reserve in southeastern Australia. J Veg Sci 14:345–354. doi:10.1658/1100-9233(2003)014[0345:AAOPFT]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown A, Thomson-Dans C, Marchant N (eds) (1998) Western Australia’s threatened flora. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Gorley RN (2001) PRIMER v5: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates DJ, Atkins KA (2001) Priority setting and the conservation of Western Australia’s diverse and highly endemic flora. Biol Conserv 97:251–263. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00123-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafni A (1992) Pollination ecology. A practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz S, Cabido M (2001) Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:646–655. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02283-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endress PK (1994) Diversity and evolutionary biology of tropical flowers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri K, van der Pijl L (1979) The principles of pollination ecology. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitay H, Noble IR (1997) What are functional types and how should we seek them? In: Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI (eds) Plant functional types. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanznig A (1995) Native vegetation clearance, habitat loss and biodiversity decline. An overview of recent native vegetation clearance in Australia and its implications for biodiversity. Biodiversity Unit, Department of the Environment, Sport and Territories, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower JC (1971) A general co-efficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27:857–871. doi:10.2307/2528823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs RJ (1993) Effects of landscape fragmentation on ecosystem processes in the Western Australian wheatbelt. Biol Conserv 64:193–201. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(93)90321-Q

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopper SD, Gioia P (2004) The Southwest Australian Floristic Region: evolution and conservation of a global hot spot of diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:623–650. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.112202.130201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennersten O (1988) Pollination in Dianthus deltoides (Caryophyllaceae): effects of habitat fragmentation on visitation and seed set. Conserv Biol 2:359–366. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1988.tb00200.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SD, Steiner KE (2000) Generalization versus specialization in plant pollination systems. Trends Ecol Evol 15:140–143. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01811-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns CA, Inouye DW, Waser NM (1998) Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant–pollinator interactions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:83–112. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb A, Diekmann M (2005) Effects of life-history traits on responses of plant species to forest fragmentation. Conserv Biol 19:929–938. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00065.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11:849–856. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96319.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S, Garnier E (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 16:545–556. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavorel S, McIntyre S, Landsberg J, Forbes TDA (1997) Plant functional classifications: from general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends Ecol Evol 12:474–478. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01219-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF (1988) Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre S, Díaz S, Lavorel S, Cramer W (1999) Plant functional types and disturbance dynamics—introduction. J Veg Sci 10:604–608. doi:10.2307/3237077

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble IR, Gitay H (1996) A functional classification for predicting the dynamics of landscapes. J Veg Sci 7:329–336. doi:10.2307/3236276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble IR, Slatyer RO (1980) The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio 43:5–21. doi:10.1007/BF00121013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paczkowska G, Chapman AR (2000) The Western Australian Flora. Wildflower Society of Western Australia, Western Australian Herbarium, Department of Conservation and Land Management, Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TM, Shugart HH, Woodward FI, Burton PJ (1993) Plant functional types. In: Solomon SM, Shugart HH (eds) Vegetation dynamics and global change. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 272–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Spira TP (2001) Plant pollinator interactions; a threatened mutualism with implications for the ecology and management of rare plants. Nat Areas J 21:78–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JD (2001) How do visitation patterns vary among pollinators in relation to floral display and floral design in a generalist pollination system? Oecologia 126:386–394. doi:10.1007/s004420000531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker J, Hopkins MS (1990) Vegetation. In: McDonald RC, Isbell RF, Speight JG, Walker J, Hopkins MS (eds) Australian soil and land survey handbook. Inkata Press, Melbourne, pp 58–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser NM, Chittka L, Price MV, Williams NM, Ollerton J (1996) Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77:1043–1060. doi:10.2307/2265575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Western Australian Herbarium (1998) FloraBase—information on the Western Australian Flora. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Perth. http://florabase.calm.wa.gov.au

  • Woodward FI, Cramer W (1996) Plant functional types and climatic changes. Introduction. J Veg Sci 7:306–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates CJ, Ladd PG (2004) Breeding system, pollination and demography in the rare granite shrub Verticordia staminosa ssp. staminosa in south-west Western Australia. Austral Ecol 29:189–200. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2004.01336.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Australian Research Council (ARC Linkage) provided financial support for this project (AJF). The Western Australian Herbarium (PERTH) is thanked for granting access to plant specimens of the DRF. Ms. Sarah Xu prepared Fig. 1. Don Butler (BRI) provided comments on an early version of the manuscript and assisted in the PRIMER analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Franks.

Additional information

Nomenclature Paczkowska and Chapman (2000).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

DOC 1,555 kb

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franks, A.J., Yates, C.J. & Hobbs, R.J. Defining plant functional groups to guide rare plant management. Plant Ecol 204, 207–216 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9585-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9585-4

Keywords

Navigation