Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Valsalva leak point pressure-associated Q-tip angle and simple female stress urinary incontinence symptoms

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To clarify the association between clinically defined simple stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms and urodynamic SUI, we examined the relationship between Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP) as measured by the Q-tip test and Stamey grade in simple female SUI.

Methods

Two hundred grade I or II female SUI patients with SUI symptom were examined by reviewing medical history; physical examination; urethral mobility as assessed by Q-tip test; stress test; and cystometry, including VLPP measurement. On the basis of the VLPP, patients were classified into urethral hypermobility [UH, subdivided into anatomical incontinence (AI) and equivocal incontinence (EI)] or intrinsic sphincter deficiency groups for analysis of the relationship between VLPP and Stamey grade and Q-tip angle.

Results

Seventy-eight patients were included, and the mean patient age was 54 ± 7.5 years, mean SUI symptom duration 2.8 years (range 0.5–6 years), mean VLPP 103.6 ± 18.4 cm H2O, and mean Q-tip angle 28.6° ± 7.2°. Fifty-three patients were categorized as Stamey grade I, 25 as Stamey grade II, 51 as AI, and 27 as EI. VLPP was found to be negatively correlated with Q-tip angle (Rs = −0.798, Y = −0.313X + 60.95, P < 0.001), and classifications of VLPP and Stamey grade have positive correlation (χ 2 = 4.9130, P = 0.0267).

Conclusions

In simple female SUI, VLPP is associated with the Q-tip angle and Stamey grade, which may help to reduce some of urodynamic items.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM et al (2010) An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J 21:5–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Montesino-Semper MF, Jimenez-Calvo JM, Cabases JM et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness analysis of the surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence using slings and meshes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 171(1):180–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21:167–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tantanasis T, Daniilidis A, Pantelis A et al (2013) Minimally invasive techniques for female stress urinary incontinence, how, why, when. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288:995–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shah SM, Gaunay GS (2012) Treatment options for intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Nat Rev Urol 9:638–651

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Serati M, Cattoni E, Siesto G et al (2013) Urodynamic evaluation: can it prevent the need for surgical intervention in women with apparent pure stress urinary incontinence? BJU Int 112:E344–E350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Serati M, Ghezzi F, Cattoni E et al (2012) Tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: efficacy and adverse effects at 10-year follow-up. Eur Urol 61:939–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. van Leijsen SA, Kluivers KB, Mol BW et al (2012) Can preoperative urodynamic investigation be omitted in women with stress urinary incontinence? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. Neurourol Urodyn 31:1118–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim SO, Kim YJ, Yoo DH et al (2011) Clinical factors associated with low valsalva leak point pressure among women with stress urinary incontinence. Int Neurourol J 15:211–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cummings JM, Boullier JA, Parra RO et al (1997) Leak point pressures in women with urinary stress incontinence: correlation with patient history. J Urol 157:818–820

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nitti VW, Combs AJ (1996) Correlation of Valsalva leak point pressure with subjective degree of stress urinary incontinence in women. J Urol 155(1):281–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SO, Jung HS, Jang WS et al (2013) Measurement of the Q-tip angle before and after tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O): preoperative urethral mobility may predict surgical outcome. Int Urogynecol J 24:1005–1009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Visco AG, Wei JT, McClure LA et al (2003) Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Effects of examination technique modifications on pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 14:136–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stamey TA (1980) Endoscopic suspension of the vesical neck for urinary incontinence in females. Report on 203 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 192:465–471

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L et al (2002) Good urodynamic practices: uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 21:261–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nager CW, Kraus SR, Kenton K et al (2010) Urodynamics, the supine empty bladder stress test, and incontinence severity. Neurourol Urodyn 29:1306–1311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Türker P, Kilic G, Tarcan T (2010) The presence of transurethral cystometry catheter and type of stress test affect the measurement of abdominal leak point pressure (ALPP) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Neurourol Urodyn 29:536–539

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Osborn DJ, Strain M, Gomelsky A et al (2013) Obesity and female stress urinary incontinence. Urology 82:759–763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wehrberger C, Madersbacher S, Jungwirth S et al (2012) Lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence in a geriatric cohort—a population-based analysis. BJU Int 110:1516–1521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kawasaki A, Wu JM, Amundsen CL et al (2012) Do urodynamic parameters predict persistent postoperative stress incontinence after midurethral sling? A systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 23:813–822

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McGuire EJ, Lytton B, Kohorn EI et al (1980) The value of urodynamic testing in stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 124:256–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mashidori T, Yamanishi T, Yoshida K et al (2007) Continuous urinary incontinence presenting as the initial symptoms demonstrating a contractile detrusor and intrinsic sphincter deficiency in multiple system atrophy. Int J Urol 14:972–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hosker G (2009) Is it possible to diagnose intrinsic sphincter deficiency in women? Curr Opin Urol 19(4):342–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Anger JT, Scott VC, Kiyosaki K et al (2013) Development of quality indicators for women with urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 32:1058–1063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. DeLancey JO (1994) Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(6):1713–1723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P et al (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7:81–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Delorme E (2001) Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol 11:1306–1313

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fritel X, Zabak K, Pigne A et al (2002) Predictive value of urethral mobility before suburethral tape procedure for urinary stress incontinence in women. J Urol 168:2472–2475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Karram MM, Bhatia NN (1988) The Q-tip test: standardization of the technique and its interpretation in women with urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 71:807–811

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bergman A, Koonings PP, Ballard CA (1989) Negative Q-tip test as a risk factor for failed incontinence surgery in women. J Reprod Med 34:193–197

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cogan SL, Weber AM, Hammel JP (2002) Is urethral mobility really being assessed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system? Obstet Gynecol 99:473–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Tian Fang Li at Rush University Medical Center (Chicago, IL, USA) for editing the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Wen, J.G., Shen, H. et al. Valsalva leak point pressure-associated Q-tip angle and simple female stress urinary incontinence symptoms. Int Urol Nephrol 46, 2103–2108 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0772-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0772-4

Keywords

Navigation