Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Using high-resolution LiDAR data to quantify the three-dimensional structure of vegetation in urban green space

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The spatial arrangement and vertical structure of vegetation in urban green spaces are key factors in determining the types of benefits that urban parks provide to people. This includes opportunities for recreation, spiritual fulfilment and biodiversity conservation. However, there has been little consideration of how the fine-scale spatial and vertical structure of vegetation is distributed in urban parks, primarily due to limitations in methods for doing so. We addressed this gap by developing a method using Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data to map, at a fine resolution, tree cover, vegetation spatial arrangement, and vegetation vertical structure. We then applied this method to urban parks in Brisbane, Australia. We found that parks varied mainly in their amount of tree cover and its spatial arrangement, but also in vegetation vertical structure. Interestingly, the vertical structure of vegetation was largely independent of its cover and spatial arrangement. This suggests that vertical structure may be being managed independently to tree cover to provide different benefits across urban parks with different levels of tree cover. Finally, we were able to classify parks into three distinct classes that explicitly account for both the spatial and vertical structure of tree cover. Our approach for mapping the three-dimensional vegetation structure of urban green space provides a much more nuanced and functional description of urban parks than has previously been possible. Future research is now needed to quantify the relationships between vegetation structure and the actual benefits people derive from urban green space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson BJ, Armsworth PR, Eigenbrod F, Thomas CD, Gillings S, Heinemeyer A, et al. (2009) Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. J Appl Ecol 46(4):888–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argüelles M, Benavides C, Fernández I (2014) A new approach to the identification of regional clusters: hierarchical clustering on principal components. Appl Econ 46(21):2511–2519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armston JD, Danaher TJ, Scarth PF, Moffiet TN, Denham RJ (2009) Prediction and validation of foliage projective cover from Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ imagery. J Appl Remote Sens 3(1):033540

  • Atiqul Haq SM (2011) Urban green spaces and an integrative approach to sustainable environment. J Environ Prot 2(5):601–608

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2015). National Regional Profile: Brisbane from http://stat.abs.gov.au/itt/r.jsp?RegionSummary&region=31000&dataset=ABS_REGIONAL_LGA&geoconcept=REGION&maplayerid=LGA2013&measure=ME

  • Barbosa O, Tratalos JA, Armsworth PR, Davies RG, Fuller RA, Johnson P, Gaston KJ (2007) Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 83(2):187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerke T, Østdahl T, Thrane C, Strumse E (2006) Vegetation density of urban parks and perceived appropriateness for recreation. Urban For Urban Green 5(1):35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29(2):293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury RB, Hill RA, Mason DC, Hinsley SA, Wilson JD, Balzter H, et al. (2005) Modelling relationships between birds and vegetation structure using airborne LiDAR data: a review with case studies from agricultural and woodland environments. Ibis 147(3):443–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brisbane City Council. (2006). Park Classification System Guide. Brisbane

  • Brisbane City Council. (2014). Brisbane City Plan 2014. Brisbane.

  • Cranz G (1982) The politics of park design. A history of urban parks in America. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Cranz G, Boland M (2004) Defining the sustainable park: a fifth model for urban parks. Landsc J 23(2):102–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culbert PD, Radeloff VC, Flather CH, Kellndorfer JM, Rittenhouse CD, Pidgeon AM (2013) The influence of vertical and horizontal habitat structure on nationwide patterns of avian biodiversity. Auk 130(4):656–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies AB, Asner GP (2014) Advances in animal ecology from 3D-LiDAR ecosystem mapping. Trends Ecol Evol 29(12):681–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies RG, Barbosa O, Fuller RA, Tratalos J, Burke N, Lewis D, et al. (2008) City-wide relationships between green spaces, urban land use and topography. Urban Ecosystems 11(3):269–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Development Core Team R (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

  • Dobbs C, Kendal D, Nitschke C (2013) The effects of land tenure and land use on the urban forest structure and composition of Melbourne. Urban For Urban Green 12(4):417–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer J, Lindenmayer DB (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16(3):265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Gaston KJ (2009) The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biol Lett 5(3):352–355

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3(4):390–394

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb H, Hochuli DF (2002) Habitat fragmentation in an urban environment: large and small fragments support different arthropod assemblages. Biol Conserv 106(1):91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobster PH, Westphal LM (2004) The human dimensions of urban greenways: planning for recreation and related experiences. Landsc Urban Plan 68(2):147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25(2):90–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin NR, Coops NC, Tooke TR, Christen A, Voogt JA (2009) Characterizing urban surface cover and structure with airborne lidar technology. Can J Remote Sens 35(3):297–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon C, Manson R, Sundberg J, Cruz-Angón A (2007) Biodiversity, profitability, and vegetation structure in a Mexican coffee agroecosystem. Agric Ecosyst Environ 118(1):256–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han W, Zhao S, Feng X, Chen L (2014) Extraction of multilayer vegetation coverage using airborne LiDAR discrete points with intensity information in urban areas: a case study in Nanjing City, China. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 30:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helzer CJ, Jelinski DE (1999) The relative importance of patch area and perimeter-area ratio to grassland breeding birds. Ecol Appl 9(4):1448–1458

    Google Scholar 

  • Höfle B, Hollaus M, Hagenauer J (2012) Urban vegetation detection using radiometrically calibrated small-footprint full-waveform airborne LiDAR data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 67:134–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm S (2000) Use and importance of urban parks. Forest & Landscape Research-Forskningscentret for Skov & Landskab 28:284

  • Huang Y, Zhou J, Hu C, Tan W, Hu Z, Wu J (2013) Toward automatic estimation of urban green volume using airborne LiDAR data and high resolution remote sensing images. Frontiers of Earth Science 7(1):43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husson F, Josse J, Pages J (2010) Principal component methods-hierarchical clustering-partitional clustering: why would we need to choose for visualizing data. Agrocampus Quest. https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/FactoMineR/vignettes/clustering.pdf.

  • Kendal D, Williams NSG, Williams KJH (2012) Drivers of diversity and tree cover in gardens, parks and streetscapes in an Australian city. Urban For Urban Green 11(3):257–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong F, Nakagoshi N (2005) Changes of urban green spaces and their driving forces: a case study of Jinan city. China J Int Dev Cooperat 11:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong F, Yin H, Nakagoshi N, Zong Y (2010) Urban green space network development for biodiversity conservation: identification based on graph theory and gravity modeling. Landsc Urban Plan 95(1):16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaPaix R, Freedman B (2010) Vegetation structure and composition within urban parks of Halifax regional municipality, Nova Scotia, Canada. Landsc Urban Plan 98(2):124–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lê S, Josse J, Husson F (2008) FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 25(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefsky MA, Cohen WB, Parker GG, Harding DJ (2002) Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience 51(1):19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann I, Mathey J, Rößler S, Bräuer A, Goldberg V (2014) Urban vegetation structure types as a methodological approach for identifying ecosystem services–application to the analysis of micro-climatic effects. Ecol Indic 42:58–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB, Fuller RA (2013) FORUM: sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world's cities? J Appl Ecol 50(5):1161–1168

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB, Fuller RA, Bush R, Gaston KJ, Shanahan DF (2014) Opportunity or orientation? Who uses urban parks and why. PLoS One 9(1):e87422

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lu F, Li Z (2003) A model of ecosystem health and its application. Ecol Model 170(1):55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luck GW, Davidson P, Boxall D, Smallbone L (2011) Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conserv Biol 25(4):816–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maas J, Van Dillen SME, Verheij RA, Groenewegen PP (2009) Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health & Place 15(2):586–595

  • MacArthur RH, MacArthur JW (1961) On bird species diversity. Ecology 42(3):594–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack GR, Rock M, Toohey AM, Hignell D (2010) Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: a review of qualitative research. Health & Place 16(4):712–726

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell MGE, Suarez-Castro AF, Martinez-Harms M, Maron M, McAlpine C, Gaston KJ, et al. (2015) Reframing landscape fragmentation's effects on ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol 30(4):190–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miura N, Jones SD (2010) Characterizing forest ecological structure using pulse types and heights of airborne laser scanning. Remote Sens Environ 114(5):1069–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morsdorf F, Kötz B, Meier E, Itten KI, Allgöwer B (2006) Estimation of LAI and fractional cover from small footprint airborne laser scanning data based on gap fraction. Remote Sens Environ 104(1):50–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333(6047):1289–1291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Jaén MC, Aide TM (2005) Vegetation structure, species diversity, and ecosystem processes as measures of restoration success. For Ecol Manag 218(1):159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler J, Bates A, Hale J, James P (2010) Bringing cities alive: the importance of urban green spaces for people and biodiversity. Urban ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 230–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandström UG, Angelstam P, Mikusiński G (2006) Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landsc Urban Plan 77(1):39–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarth P, Armston J, Danaher T (2008) On the relationship between crown cover, foliage projective cover and leaf area index. Paper presented at the 14th Australasian Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Conference, Bartolo R., Edwards A., Spatial Sciences Institute, Australia.

  • Seavy NE, Viers JH, Wood JK (2009) Riparian bird response to vegetation structure: a multiscale analysis using LiDAR measurements of canopy height. Ecol Appl 19(7):1848–1857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan DF, Lin BB, Gaston KJ, Bush R, Fuller RA (2014) Socio-economic inequalities in access to nature on public and private lands: a case study from Brisbane, Australia. Landsc Urban Plan 130:14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan DF, Lin BB, Gaston KJ, Bush R, Fuller RA (2015) What is the role of trees and remnant vegetation in attracting people to urban parks? Landsc Ecol 30(1):153–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson WD, Allen HD, Coomes DA (2014) Applications of airborne lidar for the assessment of animal species diversity. Methods Ecol Evol 5(8):719–729

  • Threlfall CG, Law B, Banks PB (2013) Roost selection in suburban bushland by the urban sensitive bat Nyctophilus Gouldi. J Mammal 94(2):307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooke TR, Coops NC, Goodwin NR, Voogt JA (2009) Extracting urban vegetation characteristics using spectral mixture analysis and decision tree classifications. Remote Sens Environ 113:398–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–197

  • Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kaźmierczak A, Niemela J, James P (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plan 81(3):167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Herzele A, Wiedemann T (2003) A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landsc Urban Plan 63(2):109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen E, Nijkamp P, de Noronha Vaz T (2010) The multifunctional use of urban greenspace. Int J Agric Sustain 8(1–2):20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vierling KT, Vierling LA, Gould WA, Martinuzzi S, Clawges RM (2008) Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling. Front Ecol Environ 6(2):90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt A, Kabisch N, Wurster D, Haase D, Breuste J (2014) Structural diversity: a multi-dimensional approach to assess recreational services in urban parks. Ambio 43(4):480–491

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Blanchet FG, Koper N (2014) Measuring habitat fragmentation: an evaluation of landscape pattern metrics. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5(7): 634–646

  • Ward JH Jr (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58(301):236–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing BM, Ritchie MW, Boston K, Cohen WB, Gitelman A, Olsen MJ (2012) Prediction of understory vegetation cover with airborne lidar in an interior ponderosa pine forest. Remote Sens Environ 124:730–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou W, Troy A (2008) An object-oriented approach for analysing and characterizing urban landscape at the parcel level. Int J Remote Sens 29(11):3119–3135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimble DA, Evans DL, Carlson GC, Parker RC, Grado SC, Gerard PD (2003) Characterizing vertical forest structure using small-footprint airborne LiDAR. Remote Sens Environ 87(2):171–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Project DP130100218. We thank Brisbane City Council for assisting with and providing data sets, Danielle Shanahan for assisting with the parks data, and the Departments of Science, Information Technology and Innovation and Natural Resources and Mines for providing access to the airborne LiDAR data. The authors also thank three anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland, QLD, Brisbane, 4072, Australia

    Rhiannon J. C. Caynes, Matthew G. E. Mitchell, Dan Sabrina Wu, Kasper Johansen & Jonathan R. Rhodes

Authors
  1. Rhiannon J. C. Caynes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Matthew G. E. Mitchell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dan Sabrina Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kasper Johansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jonathan R. Rhodes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rhiannon J. C. Caynes.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 5.27 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caynes, R.J.C., Mitchell, M.G.E., Wu, D.S. et al. Using high-resolution LiDAR data to quantify the three-dimensional structure of vegetation in urban green space. Urban Ecosyst 19, 1749–1765 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0571-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0571-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation