Abstract
Animated graphics are extensively used in multimedia instructions explaining how natural or artificial dynamic systems work. As animation directly depicts spatial changes over time, it is legitimate to believe that animated graphics will improve comprehension over static graphics. However, the research failed to find clear evidence in favour of animation. Animation may also be used to promote interactions in computer-supported collaborative learning. In this setting as well, the empirical studies have not confirmed the benefits that one could intuitively expect from the use of animation. One explanation is that multimedia, including animated graphics, challenges human processing capacities, and in particular imposes a substantial working memory load. We designed an experimental study involving three between-subjects factors: the type of multimedia instruction (with static or animated graphics), the presence of snapshots of critical steps of the system (with or without snapshots) and the learning setting (individual or collaborative). The findings indicate that animation was overall beneficial to retention, while for transfer, only learners studying collaboratively benefited from animated over static graphics. Contrary to our expectations, the snapshots were marginally beneficial to learners studying individually and significantly detrimental to learners studying in dyads. The results are discussed within the multimedia comprehension framework in order to propose the conditions under which animation can benefit to learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainsworth, S., & Van Labeke, N. (2004). Multiple forms of dynamic representation. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 241–256.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Berney, S., Bétrancourt, M., & Rebetez, C. (2005). Effect of verbalization and self-explanation on learning from multmedia instruction. Paper presented at the Interlearn conference 05, Helsinki (Finland).
Bétrancourt, M., Dillenbourg, P., & Clavien, L. (2003). Reducing cognitive load by delivery features in learning from computer animation. Paper presented at the 10th EARLI biennale conference, Padova (Italy).
Catrambone, R., & Seay, A. F. (2002). Using animations to help students learn computer algorithms. Human Factors, 44, 459–511.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, 293–332.
Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. A. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington: APA Books.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and conceptual approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.
Dillenbourg, P., & Bétrancourt, M. (2006). Collaboration Load. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: research and theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–184). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understandig mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 325–360.
Hegarty, M., & Sims, V. K. (1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory and Cognition, 22(4), 411–430.
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Intructional animation versus static pictures: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 722–738.
Lowe, R. K. (2003). Animation and learning: Selective processing of information in dynamic graphics. Learning and Instruction, 13, 157–176.
Lowe, R. K. (2004). Interrogation of a dynamic visualisation during learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 257–274.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E. (2005). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 1–18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When Learning is just a click away: Does simple interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 390–397.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52.
Moore, J. L., & Rocklin, T. R. (1998). The distribution of distributed cognition: Multiple interpretations and uses. Educational Psychology Review, 10(1), 97–113.
Narayanan, N. H., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 279–315.
Ploetzner, R., Dillenbourg, P., Praier, M., & Traum, D. (1999). Learning by explaining to oneself and to others. In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 103–121). Oxford: Elsevier.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. E. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69–97). Heidelberg: Springer.
Sangin, M., Dillenbourg, P., Rebetez, C., Bétrancourt, M., & Mollinari, G. (2008). The effect of animations on verbal interaction in computer supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(5), 394–406.
Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Catrambone, R. (2006). Making the abstract concrete: Vizualizing mathematical solution procedures. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 9–26.
Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction, 13, 141–156.
Schnotz, W., Böckheler, J., & Grzondziel, H. (1999). Individual and co-operative learning with animated pictures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14(2), 245–265.
Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2008). Functions of animations in comprehension and learning. In R. K. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 93–113). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Sweller, J. (2003). Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 215–266). New-York: Academic Press.
Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Bétrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 57, 247–262.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Gaëlle Molinari and the three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and helpful comments on the first version of this paper, and to Peter Gerjets and Katharina Scheiter who greatly improved the final version through multiple comments and proposals. This research was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant #11-68102.02).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rebetez, C., Bétrancourt, M., Sangin, M. et al. Learning from animation enabled by collaboration. Instr Sci 38, 471–485 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9117-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9117-6