Skip to main content
Log in

Tribological Behavior of New Martensitic Stainless Steels Using Scratch and Dry Wear Test

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Tribology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the tribological characterization of new martensitic stainless steels by two different tribological methods (scratch and dry wear tests) and their comparison to the austenitic standard stainless steel AISI 316L. The scratch test allows obtaining critical loads, scratch friction coefficients, scratch hardness and specific scratch wear rate, and the dry wear test to quantify wear volumes. The damage has been studied by ex situ scanning electron microscopy. Wear resistance was related to the hardness and the microstructure of the studied materials, where martensitic stainless steels exhibit higher scratch wear resistance than the austenitic one, but higher hardness of the martensitic alloys did not give better scratch resistance when comparing with themselves. It has been proved it is possible to evaluate the scratch wear resistance of bulk stainless steels using scratch test. The austenitic material presented lower wear volume than the martensitic ones after the dry wear test due to phase transformation and the hardening during sliding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kwok, C.T., Lo, K.H., Cheng, F.T., Man, H.C.: Effect of processing conditions on the corrosion performance of laser surface-melted AISI 440C martensitic stainless steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 166, 221–230 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, Z., Li, C.X., Dong, H., Bell, T.: Low temperature plasma nitrocarburising of AISI 316 austenitic stainless steel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 191, 195–200 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ma, X.P., Wang, L.J., Liu, C.M., Subramanian, S.V.: Microstructure and properties of 13Cr5Ni1Mo0.025Nb0.09V0.06 N super martensitic stainless steel. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 539, 271–279 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thibault, D., Bocher, P., Thomas, M.: Residual stress and microstructure in welds of 13%Cr–4%Ni martensitic stainless steel. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209, 2195–2202 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, C.X., Bell, T.: Corrosion properties of plasma nitrided AISI 410 martensitic stainless steel in 3.5 % NaCl and 1 % HCl aqueous solutions. Corros. Sci. 48, 2036–2049 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Puli, R., Janaki Ram, G.D.: Microstructures and properties of friction surfaced coatings in AISI 440C martensitic stainless steel. Surf. Coat. Technol 207, 310–318 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcideandrés, C., Caruana, G., Alvarez, L.F.: Control of M23C6 carbides in 0.45C–13Cr martensitic stainless steel by means of three representative heat treatment parameters. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 241, 211–215 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahmoudi, A., Ghavidel, M.R.Z., Nedjad, S.H., Heidarzadeh, A., Ahmadabadi, M.N.: Aging behavior and mechanical properties of maraging steels in the presence of submicrocrystalline Laves phase particles. Mater. Charact. 62, 976–981 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meshram, S.D., Madhusudhan Reddy, G., Pandey, S.: Friction stir welding of maraging steel (Grade-250). Mater. Des. 49, 58–64 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jiang, H., Browning, R., Sue, H.-J.: Understanding of scratch-induced damage mechanisms in polymers. Polymer (Guildf). 50, 4056–4065 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bull, S.J., Berasetegui, E.G.: An overview of the potential of quantitative coating adhesion measurement by scratch testing. Tribol. Int. 39, 99–114 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rodrigo, A., Ichimura, H.: Analytical correlation of hardness and scratch adhesion for hard films. Surf. Coat. Technol. 148, 8–17 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rudermann, Y., Iost, A., Bigerelle, M.: Scratch tests to contribute designing performance maps of multilayer polymeric coatings. Tribol. Int. 44, 585–591 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Browning, R., Sue, H.-J., Minkwitz, R., Charoensirisomboon, P.: Effects of acrylonitrile content and molecular weight on the scratch behavior of styrene-acrylonitrile random copolymers. Polym. Eng. Sci. 51, 2282–2294 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Petit, F., Ott, C., Cambier, F.: Multiple scratch tests and surface-related fatigue properties of monolithic ceramics and soda lime glass. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 29, 1299–1307 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Friedrich, K., Sue, H.J., Liu, P., Almajid, A.A.: Scratch resistance of high performance polymers. Tribol. Int. 44, 1032–1046 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiang, C., Sue, H.J., Chu, J., Coleman, B.: Scratch behavior and material property relationship in polymers. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 39, 47–59 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Choi, W.-J., Lee, J.H., Weon, J.-I.: Effects of photodegradation and thermal ageing on the scratch behavior of uncoated thermoplastic olefin. Tribol. Int. 67, 90–97 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bull, S.J.: Failure mode maps in the thin film scratch adhesion test. Tribol. Int. 30, 491–498 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bull, S.J.: Can scratch testing be used as a model for the abrasive wear of hard coatings? Wear 233–235, 412–423 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sander, T., Tremmel, S., Wartzack, S.: A modified scratch test for the mechanical characterization of scratch resistance and adhesion of thin hard coatings on soft substrates. Surf. Coat. Technol. 206, 1873–1878 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, J.-S., Zhou, Y.: Can scratch tests give fracture toughness? Eng. Fract. Mech. 109, 161–168 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Akono, A.-T., Ulm, F.-J.: Scratch test model for the determination of fracture toughness. Eng. Fract. Mech. 78, 334–342 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Beake, B.D., Liskiewicz, T.W.: Comparison of nano-fretting and nano-scratch tests on biomedical materials. Tribol. Int. 63, 123–131 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ASTM International, ASTM C1624–05. Standard test method for adhesion making potentiostatic and potentiodynamic anodic polarization measurements, 2010: ASTM International, ASTM C1624–05. Standard test method for adhesion making potentiostatic and potentiodynamic anodic polarization measurements, 2010

  26. Kurkcu, P., Andena, L., Pavan, A.: An experimental investigation of the scratch behaviour of polymers: 1. Influence of rate-dependent bulk mechanical properties. Wear 290–291, 86–93 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Francois, R.: Métallurgie et traitement thermique de nouveaux aciers maraging. Trait. Therm. 390, 51–56 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Samuels, L.E.: Light Microscopy of Carbon Steels. Materials Park, Ohio: ASM International, c1999. (199)AD

  29. Tsakiris, V., Edmonds, D.V.: Martensite and deformation twinning in austenitic steels. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 273–275, 430–436 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tong, Z., Ding, C., Yan, D.: A fracture model for wear mechanism in plasma sprayed ceramic coating materials. Wear 155, 309–316 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vargonen, M., Yang, Y., Huang, L., Shi, Y.: Molecular simulation of tip wear in a single asperity sliding contact. Wear 307, 150–154 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Farias, M.C.M., Souza, R.M., Sinatora, A., Tanaka, D.K.: The influence of applied load, sliding velocity and martensitic transformation on the unlubricated sliding wear of austenitic stainless steels. Wear 263, 773–781 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zandrahimi, M., Bateni, M.R., Poladi, A., Szpunar, J.A.: The formation of martensite during wear of AISI 304 stainless steel. Wear 263, 674–678 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Misra, R.D.K., Venkatsurya, P., Wu, K.M., Karjalainen, L.P.: Ultrahigh strength martensite–austenite dual-phase steels with ultrafine structure: the response to indentation experiments. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 560, 693–699 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Song, E.P., Hwang, B., Lee, S., Kim, N.J., Ahn, J.: Correlation of microstructure with hardness and wear resistance of stainless steel blend coatings fabricated by atmospheric plasma spraying. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 429, 189–195 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank to BPI, Region Centre and Tours Plus for support of this research, and also to Aubert and Duval and UF1 for providing the materials of this study. This work is done under the project FUI 11 Mekinox. We also wish to appreciate the helpful advice from Aubert and Duval.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Dalmau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dalmau, A., Rmili, W., Joly, D. et al. Tribological Behavior of New Martensitic Stainless Steels Using Scratch and Dry Wear Test. Tribol Lett 56, 517–529 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-014-0429-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-014-0429-6

Keywords

Navigation