Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Well Orientation (Vertical vs. Horizontal) and Well Length on the Injection of CO2 in Deep Saline Aquifers

  • Published:
Transport in Porous Media Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Simulations of CO2 injection into confined saline aquifers were conducted for both vertical and horizontal injection wells. The metrics used in quantifying the performances of different injection scenarios included changes in pressure near the injection well, mass of CO2 dissolved into brine (solubility trapping), and storage efficiency, all evaluated with an assumed injection period of 50 years. Metrics were quantified as functions of well length, well orientation, CO2 injection rate, and formation anisotropy (ratio of vertical to horizontal conductivity). When equal well lengths are compared, there is not a significant difference between the predicted performances of horizontal and vertical wells. However, the length of a horizontal well may exceed the length of a vertical well because the length of the horizontal well is not constrained to the vertical thickness of the geologic formation. Simulations show that, as the length of the horizontal well is allowed to increase, the geologic formation can receive a significantly higher CO2 injection rate without exceeding a maximum allowable pressure. This result is observed in both isotropic and anisotropic formations, and suggests that horizontal wells may be advantageous under pressure-limited conditions. However, the use of horizontal wells does not significantly improve the storage efficiency, and under strongly anisotropic conditions, a vertical well provides higher storage efficiency than a horizontal well. We conclude that horizontal wells may be preferable if the goal is to sequester a large amount of CO2 in a short period of time, but do not offer a significant advantage in terms of long-term capacity of a potential repository.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachu S.: Sequestration of CO2 in geological media: criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change. Energy Convers. Manag. 41, 953–970 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachu S., Adams J.J.: Sequestration of CO2 in geological media in response to climate change: capacity of deep saline aquifers to sequester CO2 in solution. Energy Convers. Manag. 44, 3151–3175 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachu S., Bonijoly D., Bradshaw J., Burruss R., Holloway S., Christensen N.P., Mathiassen O.M.: CO2 storage capacity estimation: methodology and gaps. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 1, 430–443 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw J., Bachu S., Bonijoly D., Burruss R., Holloway S., Christensen N.P., Mathiassen O.M.: CO2 storage capacity estimation: issues and development of standards. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 1, 62–68 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruant R.G., Guswa A.J., Celia M.A., Peters C.A.: Safe storage of CO2 in deep saline aquifers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36(11), 240A–245A (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corey A.: The interrelation between gas and oil relative permeabilities. Prod. Mon. 19, 38–41 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Denney D.: Continuous improvement led to the longest horizontal well. J. Pet. Technol. (JPT) 61, 55–56 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta N., Sass B., Chattopadhyay S., Sminchak J., Wang P., Espie T.: Geologic storage of CO2 from refining and chemical facilities in the midwestern US. Energy 29, 1599–1609 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway S.: Storage of fossil-fuel-derived carbon dioxide beneath the surface of the earth. Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 26, 145–166 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC): IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY (2005)

  • Jikich, S.A., Sams, W.N., Bromhal, G., Pope, G., Gupta, N., Smith, D.H.: Carbon dioxide injectivity in brine reservoirs using horizontal wells. Presented at the second annual conference on carbon sequestration, developing & validating the technology base to reduce carbon intensity, Alexandria, Virginia, 5–8 May 2003. http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/03/carbon-seq/PDFs/107.pdf

  • Joshi S.D.: Horizontal Well Technology. PennWell Publishing Company, Tulsa, OK (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Koide H., Tazaki Y., Noguchi Y., Nakayama S., Iijima M., Ito K., Shindo Y.: Subterranean containment and long-term storage of carbon dioxide in unused aquifers and in depleted natural-gas reservoirs. Energy Convers. Manag. 33, 619–626 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp A., Class H., Helmig R.: Investigations on CO2 storage capacity in saline aquifers, Part 2: estimation of storage capacity coefficients. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 3, 277–287 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordbotten J.M., Celia M.A., Bachu S.: Injection and storage of CO2 in deep saline aquifers: analytical solution for CO2 plume evolution during injection. Transp. Porous Med. 58, 339–360 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okwen, R.T.: Enhanced CO2 storage in confined geologic formations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL (2009)

  • Okwen R.T., Stewart M.T., Cunningham J.A.: Analytical solution for estimating storage efficiency of geologic sequestration of CO2. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 4, 102–107 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozah, R., Lakshminarasimhan, G., Sepehrnoori, K., Bryant, S.: Numerical simulation of the storage of pure CO2 and CO2–H2S gas mixtures in deep saline aquifers. SPE 97255, In: Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX, 9–12 October 2005

  • Pruess K., Garcia J.: Multi-phase flow dynamics during CO2 disposal into saline aquifers. Environ. Geol. 42, 282–295 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruess K., Spycher N.: ECO2N—a fluid property module for the TOUGH2 code for studies of CO2 storage in saline aquifers. Energy Convers. Manag. 48, 1761–1767 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruess K., Oldenburg C., Moridis G.: TOUGH2 User’s Guide, Version 2.0. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory report LBNL-43134, Berkeley, CA (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pruess K., García J., Kovscek T., Oldenburg C., Rutqvist J., Steefel C., Xu T.: Code intercomparison builds confidence in numerical simulation models for geologic disposal of CO2. Energy 29, 1431–1444 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer L.G.H.: Investigations regarding the storage of carbon dioxide in aquifers in the Netherlands. Energy Convers. Manag. 33, 611–618 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer L.G.H.: The conditions limiting CO2 storage in aquifers. Energy Convers. Manag. 34, 959–966 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meer L.G.H.: CO2 storage efficiency of aquifers. Energy Convers. Manag. 36, 513–518 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Genucthen M.Th.: A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 892–898 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White C.M., Strazisar B.R., Granite E.J., Hoffman J.S., Pennline H.W.: Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations: coalbeds and deep saline aquifers. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 53, 645–715 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Cunningham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Okwen, R., Stewart, M. & Cunningham, J. Effect of Well Orientation (Vertical vs. Horizontal) and Well Length on the Injection of CO2 in Deep Saline Aquifers. Transp Porous Med 90, 219–232 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-010-9686-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-010-9686-5

Keywords

Navigation