Abstract
On the basis of observations at four enhanced coalbed methane (ECBM)/CO2 sequestration pilots, a laboratory-scale study was conducted to understand the flow behavior of coal in a methane/CO2 environment. Sorption-induced volumetric strain was first measured by flooding fresh coal samples with adsorptive gases (methane and CO2). In order to replicate the CO2–ECBM process, CO2 was then injected into a methane-saturated core to measure the incremental “swelling.” As a separate effort, the permeability of a coal core, held under triaxial stress, was measured using methane. This was followed by CO2 flooding to replace the methane. In order to best replicate the conditions in situ, the core was held under uniaxial strain, that is, no horizontal strain was permitted during CO2 flooding. Instead, the horizontal stress was adjusted to ensure zero strain. The results showed that the relative strain ratio for CO2/methane was between 2 and 3.5. The measured volumetric strains were also fitted using a Langmuir-type model, thus enabling calculation of the strain at any gas pressure and using the analytical permeability models. For permeability work, effort was made to increase the horizontal stress to achieve the desired zero horizontal strain condition expected under in situ condition, but this became impossible because the “excess” stress required to maintain this condition was very large, resulting in sample failure. Finally, when CO2 was introduced and horizontal strain was permitted, permeability reduction was an order of magnitude greater, suggesting that the “excess” stress would have reduced it significantly further. The positive finding of the work was that the “excess” stresses associated with injection of CO2 are large. The excess stresses generated might be sufficient to cause microfracturing and increased permeability, and improved injectivity. Also, there might be a weakening effect resulting from repeated CO2 injection, as has been found to be the case with thermal cycling of rocks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- b :
-
Reciprocal of pure gas Langmuir pressure constant, MPa−1
- C m :
-
Grain compressibility coefficient, MPa−1
- dP :
-
Change in pressure, MPa
- dV m :
-
Change in volume of solid core
- E :
-
Young’s modulus, MPa
- P :
-
Reservoir pressure, MPa
- P L :
-
Pure gas Langmuir pressure constant, MPa
- \({P_{\varepsilon}}\) :
-
Pressure at which coal attains 50% of the maximum strain, MPa
- V L :
-
Pure gas Langmuir volume constant, m3/t
- V m :
-
Initial volume of solid core
- γ :
-
Grain compressibility of coal, MPa−1
- \({\varepsilon_{\max}}\) :
-
Maximum volumetric strain at infinite pressure
- \({\varepsilon_{\rm s}}\) :
-
Sorption-induced volumetric strain
- \({\varepsilon_{x}}\) :
-
Linear strain in x direction
- \({\varepsilon_{y}}\) :
-
Linear strain in y direction
- \({\varepsilon_{z}}\) :
-
linear strain in z direction
- ν :
-
Poisson’s ratio, dimensionless
- σ :
-
Effective horizontal stress, MPa
- ΔC/C :
-
Circumferential strain, dimensionless
- ‘0’:
-
Indicates the parameter values are at initial reservoir conditions
References
Arri, L.E., et al.: Modeling coalbed methane production with binary gas sorption. In: SPE 24363, Proceedings, SPE Rocky Mountain Regional Meeting, Casper, Wyoming (1992)
Connell, L.: An overview of CSIRO research on CO2 sequestration in coal. In: Coal-Seq V, Houston, November (2006)
Fujioka, M.: Japan CO2 geo-sequestration in coal seams project. In: Coal-Seq V, Houston, November (2006)
Gunter, W.D., et al.: Process for predicting porosity and permeability of a coalbed. US Patent 6,860,147 (2005)
Levine, J.R.: Model study of the influence of matrix shrinkage on absolute permeability of coal bed reservoirs. In: Gayer, R., Harris, I. (eds.) Coalbed Methane and Coal Geology, pp. 197–212. Geologic Society Special Publication No. 109 (1996)
Mitra, A., Harpalani, S.: Modeling incremental swelling of coal matrix with CO2 injection in coalbed methane reservoirs. In: Proceedings, SPE Eastern Regional Meeting, Lexington, Kentucky (2007)
Ottinger S. et al.: Adsorption of pure carbon dioxide and methane on dry coal from the Sulcis Coal Province (SW Sardinia, Italy). Environ. Prog. 25, 355–364 (2006)
Palmer I.: Permeability changes in coal: analytical modeling. Int. J. Coal Geol. 77, 119–126 (2008)
Palmer I., Mansoori J.: How permeability depends on stress and pore pressure in coalbeds: a new model. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 1, 539–544 (1998)
Pekot, L.J., Reeves, S.R.: Modeling the effects of matrix shrinkage and differential swelling on coalbed methane recovery and carbon sequestration. In: Proceedings, 2003 International Coalbed Methane Symposium, Tuscaloosa, Alabama (2003)
Puri, R., et al.: Method of increasing the permeability of a coal seam. US Patent 5,014,788 (1991)
Reeves S.R.: Enhanced CBM recovery, coalbed sequestration assessed. Oil Gas J. 14, 49–53 (2003)
Reeves, S.R.: An overview of CO2-ECBM/sequestration in coal seams. AAPG Special Publication on Geological Sequestration of CO2 (2006)
Shi J.Q., Durucan S.: A model for changes in coalbed permeability during primary and enhanced methane recovery. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 8, 291–299 (2005)
Viete D.R., Ranjith P.G.: The effect of CO2 on the geomechanical and permeability behaviour of brown coal: implications for coal seam CO2 sequestration. Int. J. Coal Geol. 66, 204–216 (2006)
Viete D.R., Ranjith P.G.: The mechanical behaviour of coal with respect to CO2 sequestration in deep coal seams. Fuel 86, 2667–2671 (2007)
White C.M. et al.: Sequestration of carbon dioxide in coal with enhanced coalbed methane recovery—a review. Energy Fuel 3, 660–724 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harpalani, S., Mitra, A. Impact of CO2 Injection on Flow Behavior of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs. Transp Porous Med 82, 141–156 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-009-9475-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-009-9475-1