Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of novel methods for the initiation of in vitro bryophyte cultures for conservation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The value of ex situ plant collections for conservation is increasingly recognised. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (RGB, Kew) has been pioneering methods for the development of such collections with the establishment of the Millennium Seed Bank and a project for the ex situ conservation of threatened UK bryophytes (mosses, liverworts, hornworts). A broad range of bryophytes are currently held in a tissue culture collection at RBG, Kew on sucrose-free ¼ or ½ Murashige & Skoog or Knops minimal medium. The efficacy of the novel sterilising agent Sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC) was tested on a range of taxa, utilising a variety of bryophytic initiation material. Concentrations of 1% (w/v) for 3 min and 0.5% (w/v) for 2 min, without the addition of detergent, were found to be successful in initiating cultures from sporophytes and leafy gametophores respectively. Initiation of cultures from wild-collected sporophytes was more successful than from wild-collected gametophores. However, pre-culturing of gametophore material was found to enhance success rate of procedures. Transferring visibly clean material away from contamination post-initiation was also determined to increase protocol success rate. The ability of the biocide Plant Preservative MixtureTM (PPMTM) to control fungal and bacterial contamination in bryophyte protonemal cultures was also tested, but not found to be suitable. However, results obtained indicated that contamination may confer resistance on the moss against the phytotoxic effects of the biocide. Methods developed have wider applicability for the establishment of in vitro collections of other threatened plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Basile DV, Basile MR (1988) Procedures used for the axenic culture and experimental treatment of bryophytes. In: Glime JM (ed) Methods in bryology. Proceedings of the bryological methods workshop, Mainz. The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan, Japan, pp 1–16

  • Bhojwani SS, Razdan MK (1996) Plant tissue culture: theory and practice, a revised edition. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Blockeel TL, Long DG (1998) A check-list and census catalogue of British and Irish bryophytes. British Bryological Society, Cardiff, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Church JM, Hodgetts NG, Preston CD, Stewart NF (2001) British red data books – mosses and liverworts. JNCC, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckett JG, Burch J, Fletcher PW, Matcham HW, Read DJ, Russell AJ, Pressel S (2004) In vitro cultivation of bryophytes: a review of practicalities, problems, progress and promise. J Bryol 26:3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George MW, Tripepi RR (2001) Plant Preservative Mixture (TM) can affect shoot regeneration from leaf explants of chrysanthemum, European birch, and rhododendron. Hortscience 36(4):768–769

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (2004) 2004 Red List of Threatened Species. Downloaded on 20th January 2006 http://www.redlist.org/info/tables/table1

  • IUCN SCC Bryophyte Specialist Group (2002) 2000 IUCN World Red List of Bryophytes. Downloaded on 20th January 2006 http://www.artdata.slu.se/guest/SSCBryo/WorldBryo.htm

  • Jules ES, Shaw AJ (1994) Adaptation to metal-contaminated soils in populations of the moss, Ceratodon purpureus – vegetative growth and reproductive expression. Am J Bot 81(6):791–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knop W (1865) Quantitative Untersuchungen ueber die Ernahrungsprozesse der Pflanzen. Landwirtschaftlichen Versuchsstationen 7:93–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraj W, Dolnicki A (2003) The influence of PPM upon the sterility of the in vitro cultures in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Acta Soc Bot Pol 72(4):303–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal M (1984) The culture of bryophytes including apogamy, apospory, parthenogenesis and protoplasts. In: Dyer AF, Duckett JG (eds) The experimental biology of bryophytes. Academic Press, London, pp 97–115

  • Long RD (1997) Photoautotrophic micropropagation – a strategy for contamination control? In: Cassells AC (ed) Pathogen and microbial contamination management in micropropagation, vol 12. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 267–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Maunder M, Havens K, Guerrant EO Jr, Falk DA (2004) Ex situ methods: a vital but underused set of conservation resources. In: Guerrant EO Jr, Havens K, Maunder M (eds) Ex situ plant conservation – supporting species survival in the wild. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 3–20

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15(3):473–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmaster SG, Bell FW, Vitt DH (1999) The effects of glyphosate and triclopyr on common bryophytes and lichens in northwestern Ontario. Can J For Res 29:1101–1111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niedz RP, Bausher MG (2002) Control of in vitro contamination of explants from greenhouse- and field-grown trees. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 38(5):468–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak J, Asiedu SK, Bensalim S, Richards J, Stewart A, Smith C, Stevens D, Sturz AV (1997) From laboratory to applications: challenges and progress with in vitro dual cultures of potato and beneficial bacteria. In: Cassells AC (ed) Pathogen and microbial contamination management in micropropagation, vol 12. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 321–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson M, Prendergast M, Sayegh AJ (1996) Sterilisation of explants and cultures with sodium dichloroisocyanurate. Plant Growth Regul 20(1):61–66

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paul AL, Semer C, Kucharek T, Ferl RJ (2001) The fungicidal and phytotoxic properties of benomyl and PPM in supplemented agar media supporting transgenic arabidopsis plants for a Space Shuttle flight experiment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 55(4):480–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plant-Cell-Technology (2006) PPM: A powerful tool to prevent or eliminate microbial contamination in plant tissue culture. Downloaded on 19th June 2006 http://www.ppm4plant-tc.com/

  • Porley RD, Hodgetts N (2005) Mosses & liverworts. HarperCollins, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Proctor MCF (2000) Physiological ecology. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B (eds) Bryophyte biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 225–247

  • Ramsay MM, Burch J (2001) Ex situ techniques in support of UK bryophyte conservation. Novit Bot Univ Carol 15:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay MM, Jackson AD, Porley RD (2000) A pilot study for the ex situ conservation of UK bryophytes. EuroGard 2000 – II European Botanic Gardens Congress. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain

  • Rincon E (1993) Growth responses of six bryophyte species to different light intensities. Can J Bot 71:661–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree JK, Ramsay MM (2005) Ex situ conservation off bryophytes: progress and potential of a pilot project. Bol Soc Esp Briol 26–27:17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree JK, Sheffield E, Burch J (2005) Growth and development of mosses are inhibited by the common herbicide asulam. Bryologist 108(2):287–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree JK, Lawton KF, Rumsey FJ, Sheffield E (2003) Exposure to Asulox inhibits the growth of mosses. Ann Bot (Lond.) 92(4):547–556

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sabovljevic M, Bijelovic A, Dragicevic I (2003) In vitro culture of mosses:Aloina aloides (K.F. Schultz) Kindb., Brachythecium velutinum (Hedw.) B.S.G., Ceratodon purpureus (Hedw.) Brid., Eurhynchium praelongum (Hedw.) B.S.G. and Grimmia pulvinata (Hedw.) Sm. Turk. J Bot 27:441–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasan V, Cripps R, Ramsay MM, Atherton C, McMichen M, Prendergast G, Rowntree JK (2006) Conservation in vitro of threatened plants – progress in the last decade. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 42(3):206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargent ML (1988) A guide to the axenic culturing of a spectrum of bryophytes. In: Glime JM (ed) Methods in bryology. Proceedings of the bryological methods workshop, Mainz. The Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Nichinan, Japan, pp 17–24

  • Såstad SM, Bakken S, Pedersen B (1998) Propagation of Sphagnum in axenic culture – a method for obtaining large numbers of cloned gametophores. Lindbergia 23:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffe H (1959) The analysis of variance. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AJE (2004) The moss flora of Britain & Ireland. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal I, Kuta E, Przywara L (1997) Callus induction and gametophyte regeneration in moss cultures. Acta Biol Cracov Ser Bot 39:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. W.H. Freeman & Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SYSTAT-Software-Inc. (2004) SYSTAT. 10 SYSTAT statistics I. Richmond, CA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanner C (2004) The Millenium Seed Bank. Curtis’s Bot Mag 21(1):91–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Biodiversity Group (1999) Tranche 2 Action Plans. Volume III – plants and fungi. UK Biodiversity Group & English Nature, Peterborough

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Text and Annexes. CBD Secretariat, Montreal, Canada http://www.biodiv.org/convention/articles.asp

  • UNEP (2002) Global Strategy for Plant Conservation. Decision VI/9 UNEP/CBD/COP/6/20 CBD Secretariat, Montreal, Canada http://www.bgci.org.uk/files/7/0/global_strategy.pdf

  • Vitt DH (2000) Peatlands: ecosystems dominated by bryophytes. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B (eds) Bryophyte biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 17–24

  • Walter KS, Gillett HJ (1998) 1997 IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Whipps JM (2001) Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot 52(suppl 1):487–511

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund K, Rydin H (2004) Ecophysiological constraints on spore establishment in bryophytes. Funct Ecol 18(6):907–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage, Conservation Council for Wales for providing funding for the project, the lead partners for the UK species Biodiversity Action Plans (Countryside Council for Wales, English Nature, Natural History Museum, Plantlife, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew Scottish Natural Heritage) for allowing collection and J. G. Duckett, A. D. Headley, N. G. Hodgetts, D. T. Holyoak, D. Long, R. Porley, G. Rothero, F. J. Rumsey and R. Wood for collecting and supplying and verifying the bryophyte material. Thanks also to M. M. Ramsay and two anonymous reviewers for comments on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. K. Rowntree.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rowntree, J.K. Development of novel methods for the initiation of in vitro bryophyte cultures for conservation. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 87, 191–201 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9154-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9154-7

Keywords

Navigation