Skip to main content
Log in

A Betting Market: Description and a Theoretical Explanation of Bets in Pelota Matches

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Pelota matches, bets are made between viewers through a middleman who receives 16% of the finally paid amount. In this paper, a description of the way bets are made and an explanation of the existence of those markets are presented. Taking betting markets as a simplified analogy for financial markets we have searched for the explanation in a world where both sides of the market are not different in believes and preferences. We find that for a bet to exist when bettors are rank dependent expected utility maximizers, they have to be optimistic. Taking observations from actually made bets a preliminary analysis about the biases of those markets is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdellaoui M. (2000), Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Science 46(11): 1497–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allais M. (1953), Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risqué, critique des postulats et axioms de l’école Américaine. Econometrica 21(4): 503–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder A.S., Canetti E.R.D., Lebow D.E., Rudd J.B. (1998). Asking About Prices. A New Approach to Understanding Price Sickiness. Rusell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez R., Wu G. (1999), On the shape of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psychology 38(1): 129–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köbberling, V., Schwieren, C. and Wakker, P.P. (2004), Prospect-theory’s diminishing sensitivity versus economic’s intrinsic utility of money: How the introduction of the euro can be used to disentangle the two empirically, Working Paper, December 2004.

  • Lattimore P.K., Baker J.K., Witte A.D. (1992), The influence of probability on risky choice: A parametric examination. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 17(3): 377–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin J. (1982), A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation 3(4): 323–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiggin, J. (1993), Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Sauer R.D. (1998), The Economics of wagering market. Journal of Economic Literature 36: 2021–2064

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1992), Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5(4): 297–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodland L.M., Woodland B.M. (1994), Market efficiency and the favorite long shot bias: The baseball betting market”. Journal of Finance 49(1): 269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loreto Llorente.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Llorente, L., Aizpurua, J. A Betting Market: Description and a Theoretical Explanation of Bets in Pelota Matches. Theor Decis 64, 421–446 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9060-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9060-4

Keywords

Navigation