1 Erratum to: Synthese DOI 10.1007/s11229-013-0340-y
Page 7 [online version], lines 10–16 (“Clearly, [...] Thus we have”) should be replaced by:
If \(B\) is true under the specification \([A]\), then whatever is true under the conjunctive specification \([A\wedge B]\) must already be true under \([A]\) alone:
The converse of the consequent holds under the same antecedent-condition: Suppose that all worlds specified in a given world by the description \(A\) satisfy the condition \(B\). Then the conjunctive specification \([A\wedge B]\) cannot be more restrictive than \([A]\), for \([A]\) alone already restricts the selected worlds to \(B\)-worlds. Thus we have [...]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0340-y.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuhrmann, A. Erratum to: Knowability as potential knowledge. Synthese 191, 1649 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0359-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0359-0