Abstract
In the article I discuss possible amendments and corrections to Lewis’s semantics for counterfactuals that are necessary in order to account for the indeterministic and non-local character of the quantum world. I argue that Lewis’s criteria of similarity between possible worlds produce incorrect valuations for alternate-outcome counterfactuals in the EPR case. Later I discuss an alternative semantics which rejects the notion of miraculous events and relies entirely on the comparison of the agreement with respect to individual facts. However, a controversy exists whether to include future indeterministic events in the criteria of similarity. J. Bennett has suggested that an indeterministic event count toward similarity only if it is a result of the same causal chain as in the actual world. I claim that a much better agreement with the demands of the quantum-mechanical indeterminism can be achieved when we stipulate that possible worlds which differ only with respect to indeterministic facts that take place after the antecedent-event should always be treated as equally similar to the actual world. In the article I analyze and dismiss some common-sense counterexamples to this claim. Finally, I critically evaluate Bennett’s proposal regarding the truth-conditions for true-antecedent counterfactuals.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bedford D., Stapp H. P. (1995) Bell’s theorem in an indeterministic universe. Synthese 102: 139–164
Bennett J. (1984) Counterfactuals and temporal direction. The Philosophical Review XCIII(1): 57–91
Bennett J. (2003) A philosophical guide to conditionals. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Bigaj T. (2004) Counterfactuals and spatiotemporal events. Synthese 142(1): 1–20
Bigaj T. (2006) Non-locality and possible worlds: A counterfactual perspective on quantum entanglement. Ontos Verlag, Frankfurt
Bigaj T. (2007) Counterfactuals and non-locality of quantum mechanics. Foundations of Science 12: 85–108
Clifton R., Redhead M., Butterfield J. (1990) Nonlocal influences and possible worlds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 41: 5–58
Dowe P. (2004) Causes are physically connected to their effects: Why preventers and omissions are not causes. In: Hitchcock C. (Ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 189–196
Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. (1935) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physical Review 48: 696–702
Elga A. (2001) Statistical mechanics and the asymmetry of counterfactual dependence. Philosophy of Science 68: S313–S324
Finkelstein J. (1999) Space–time counterfactuals. Synthese 119: 287–298
Ghirardi G., Grassi R. (1994) Outcome predictions and property attribution: The EPR argument reconsidered. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 25(3): 397–423
Greenberger D., Horne M., Shimony A., Zeilinger A. (1990) Bell’s theorem without inequalities. American Journal of Physics 58: 1131–1143
Griffiths R. B. (1999) Consistent quantum counterfactuals. Physical Review A 60(1): R5–R8
Griffiths R. B. (2001) Consistent quantum theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hall N. (2000) Causation and the price of transitivity. The Journal of Philosophy 97(4): 198–222
Jackson F. (1977) A causal theory of counterfactuals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 55: 3–21
Lewis D. (1973) Counterfactuals. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Lewis, D. (Ed.) (1986). Counterfactual dependence and time’s arrow. In Philosophical papers (Vol. II). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCall S. (1984) Counterfactuals based on real possible worlds. Nous 18: 463–477
Mermin D. (1998) Nonlocal character of quantum theory?. American Journal of Physics 66(10): 920–924
Müller T. (2002) Branching space–time, modal logic and the counterfactual conditional. In: Placek T., Butterfield J. (Eds.), Non-locality and modality. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 273–291
Percival P. (1999) A note on lewis on counterfactual dependence in a chancy world. Analysis 59(3): 165–173
Redhead M. (1987) Non-locality, incompleteness and realism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schaffer J. (2004) Causes need not be physically connected to their effects: The case for negative causation. In: Hitchcock C. (Ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 197–216
Shimony A., Stein H. (2001) Comment on ‘nonlocal character of quantum theory’ by Henry P Stapp. American Journal of Physics 69: 848–853
Stalnaker R. C. (1968) A theory of conditionals. In: Rescher N. (Ed.), Studies in logical theory. Blackwell, Oxford
Stapp H. P. (1971) S-matrix Interpretation of quantum theory. Physical Review 3: 1303–1320
Stapp H. P. (1989) Quantum nonlocality and the description of nature. In: Cushing J., McMullin E. (Eds.), Philosophical consequences of quantum theory reflections on Bell’s theorem. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp 154–174
Stapp H. P. (1997) Nonlocal character of quantum theory. American Journal of Physics 65: 300–304
Stapp H. (1998) Meaning of Counterfactual Statements in Quantum Physics. American Journal of Physics 66(10): 924–926
Stapp, H. P. (2001). Bell’s theorem without hidden variables. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report No. LBNL 46942, quant-ph/0010047.
Vaidmann L. (1999) Defending time-symmetrized quantum counterfactuals. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30: 373–397
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Bigaj, T. How to evaluate counterfactuals in the quantum world. Synthese 190, 619–637 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0195-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0195-7