Skip to main content
Log in

Words or deeds? Choosing what to know about others

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social cooperation often relies on individuals’ spontaneous norm obedience when there is no punishment for violation or reward for compliance. However, people do not consistently follow pro-social norms. Previous studies have suggested that an individual’s tendency toward norm conformity is affected by empirical information (i.e., what others did or would do in a similar situation) as well as by normative information (i.e., what others think one ought to do). Yet little is known about whether people have an intrinsic desire to obtain norm-revealing information. In this paper, we use a dictator game to investigate whether dictators actively seek norm-revealing information and, if so, whether they prefer to get empirical or normative information. Our data show that although the majority of dictators choose to view free information before making decisions, they are equally likely to choose empirical or normative information. However, a large majority (more than 80%) of dictators are not willing to incur even a very small cost for getting information. Our findings help to understand why norm compliance is context-dependent, and highlight the importance of making norm-revealing information salient in order to promote conformity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardsley N., Sausgruber R. (2007) Conformity and reciprocity in public good provision. Journal of Economic Psychology 26(5): 664–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardsley, N. (2007). Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact? Experimental Economics, doi:10.1007/s10683-007-9172-2

  • Berg J., Dickhaut J., McCabe K. (1995) Trust, reciprocity and social history. Games Economic Behavior 10: 122–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bicchieri C. (2006) The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicchieri C., Xiao E. (2008) Do the right thing: But only if others do so. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 21: 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bichieri C., Chavez A. (2009) Behaving as expected: Public information and fairness norms. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 23(2): 161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cason T. N., Mui V. (1998) Social influence in the sequential dictator game. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42: 248–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini R. B., Kallgren C. A., Reno R. R. (1990) A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24: 201–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox J. (2004) How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior 46: 260–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana J., Weber R. A., Kuang J. (2007) Exploiting the moral wriggle room: Experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory 33(1): 67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior communication and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (January).

  • Deutsch M., Gerard H. B. (1955) A study of normative and information social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 51: 629–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Fischbacher U. (2004) Social norms and human cooperation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(4): 185–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey B., Meier S. (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing conditional cooperation in a field experiment. American Economic Review 94(5): 1717–1722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guala, F., & Mittone, L. (2008). Paradigmatic experiments: The dictator game. CEEL working paper.

  • Kelley H. H. et al (1952) Two functions of reference groups. In: Swanson G. E. (ed.) Readings in social psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupka E., Weber A. R. (2009) The focusing and informational effects of norms on pro-social behavior. The Journal of Economic Psychology 30(3): 307–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard J. (1995) Public foods: A survey of experimental research. In: Hagel J., Roth A. (eds.) The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R. (1998) Normative expectations: The simultaneous evolution of institutions and norms. In: Ben-Ner A., Putterman L. (eds.) Economics, value, and organization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R. (2004) The economics of rights, cooperation and welfare (2nd ed.) Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire, pp 154–165

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao E., Houser D. (2009) Avoiding the sharp tongue: Anticipated written messages promote fair economic exchange. Journal of Economic Psychology 30(3): 393–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erte Xiao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiao, E., Bicchieri, C. Words or deeds? Choosing what to know about others. Synthese 187, 49–63 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0026-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0026-2

Keywords

Navigation