Abstract
The base units of the SI include six units of continuous quantities and the mole, which is defined as proportional to the number of specified elementary entities in a sample. The existence of the mole as a unit has prompted comment in Metrologia that units of all enumerable entities should be defined though not listed as base units. In a similar vein, the BIPM defines numbers of entities as quantities of dimension one, although without admitting these entities as base units. However, there is a basic ontological distinction between continuous quantities and enumerable aggregates. The distinction is the basis of the difference between real and natural numbers. This paper clarifies the nature of the distinction: (i) in terms of a set of measurement axioms stated by Hölder; and (ii) using the formalism known in metrology as quantity calculus. We argue that a clear and unambiguous scientific distinction should be made between measurement and enumeration. We examine confusion in metrological definitions and nomenclature concerning this distinction, and discuss the implications of this distinction for ontology and epistemology in all scientific disciplines.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrich D. (2003) On the distribution of measurements in units that are not arbitrary. Social Science Information 42: 557–589
Berka K. (1983) Measurement: its concepts, theories and problems. Boston series in the philosophy of science, 72. Reidel Publishing Company, Holland
Biévre P. D., Peiser H. S. (1992) ‘Atomic Weight’: the name, its history, definition and units. Pure and Applied Chemistry 64: 1535–1543
BIPM (2006). Bureau International des Poids et Mesures—Système International d’Unité s (SI). (Organisation Intergouvernementale de la Convention du Mètre).
BIPM (2008). Bureau International des Poids et Mesures—Vocabulaire international de métrologie (VIM) (Organisation Intergouvernementale de la Convention du Mètre).
de Boer J. (1994/95) On the history of quantity calculus and the International system. Metrologia 31: 405–429
Duncan O. D. (1984) Notes on social measurement: Historical and critical. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Emerson W. H. (2004a) One as a ‘Unit’ in expressing the magnitudes of quantities. Metrologia 41: 26–28
Emerson W. H. (2004b) On the algebra of quantities and their units. Metrologia 45: 134–138
Emerson W. H. (2008) On quantity calculus and units of measurement. Metrologia 45: 134–138
Hölder O. (1901) Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass. Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sachsischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig. Mathematische-Physicke Klasse 53: 1–64
Michell J. (1999) Measurement in psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Michell J. (2003) Measurement: A beginner’s guide. Journal of Applied Measurement 4: 298–308
Michell, J. (2007). Measurement. In P. T. Turner & W. R. Mark (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of science. Elsevier.
Petley, B. W. 1992. The continuing evolution in the definitions and realizations of the SI units of measurement. In: L. Crovini & T. J. Quinn (Eds.), Proceedings of the international school of Physics, course CX. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cooper, G., Humphry, S.M. The ontological distinction between units and entities. Synthese 187, 393–401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9832-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9832-1