Abstract
This paper utilizes a logical correspondence theorem (which has been proved elsewhere) for the justification of weak conceptions of scientific realism and convergence to truth which do not presuppose Putnam’s no-miracles-argument (NMA). After presenting arguments against the reliability of the unrestricted NMA in Sect. 1, the correspondence theorem is explained in Sect. 2. In Sect. 3, historical illustrations of the correspondence theorem are given, and its ontological consequences are worked out. Based on the transitivity of the concept of correspondence, a correspondence-based notion of convergence to truth is developed in Sect. 4. In the final Sect. 5 it is argued that the correspondence theorem together with the assumption of ‘minimal realism’ yields a justification of a weak version of scientific realism, which is then compared to metaphysical realism and to instrumentalism.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyd R. (1984) The current status of scientific realism. In: Leplin J. (eds) Scientific realism. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 41–82
Laudan L. (1981) A confutation of convergent realism. In: Papineau D. (eds) The philosophy of science. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 107–138
Putnam H. (1975) What is mathematical truth?. In: Putnam H. (eds) Mathematics, matter and method. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 60–78
Schurz G. (2008a) Patterns of abduction. Synthese 164: 201–234
Schurz G. (2008b) Common cause abduction and the formation of theoretical concepts. In: Dégremont C. (eds) Dialogues, logics, and other strange things. College Publications, London, pp 337–364
Schurz G. (2009) When empirical success implies theoretical reference: A structural correspondence theorem. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 101–133
Schurz G., Lambert K. (1994) Outline of a theory of scientific understanding. Synthese 101(1): 65–120
Van Fraassen B. (2006) Structure: Its shadow and substance. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 275–307
Wilson E. O. (1998) Consilience. The unity of knowledge. Alfred A. Knopf, New York
Worrall J. (1989) Structural realism: The best of both worlds. Dialectica 43(1–2): 99–124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schurz, G. Structural correspondence between theories and convergence to truth. Synthese 179, 307–320 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9784-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9784-5