Skip to main content
Log in

Science and Art: physics as a symbolic formation

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The reflection on the preconditions and evolution of science has played a decisive role in the development of Ernst Cassirer’s philosophy, contributing to its functional and thus inherently pluralistic and holistic view of knowledge. To present Cassirer’s conception of physics as an open symbolic formation enables us to reveal and study the radical features of his epistemological model:

  1. (1)

    the fundamental process of generating sense-units and meaning in its constitutive character for each attempt of objectification,

  1. (2)

    its driving and structuring dynamics that touches and transforms all elements of knowledge, the a priori included,

  1. (3)

    the strategies of justification that allow maintaining the claim of truthfulness in spite the fact that Cassirer’s open model integrates contingency and transitoriness as an inherent part of knowledge.

It thus becomes clear that Cassirer’s term ‘symbol’ cannot be reduced to its habitual representational acceptation, for its key theoretical function is to overcome the inconsistencies of dualistic epistemological models. It is this re-orientation, a kind of ‘second Copernican revolution’, that allows Cassirer to go beyond traditional dichotomies and to propose a larger frame in which to appreciate the diversity of human understanding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bitbol M. (1996) Mécanique quantique Une introduction philosophique. Flammarion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N. (1987a) Discussion with Einstein on epistemological problems of atomic physics. In: Bohr N. (eds) The philosophical writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. II: Essays 1932–1957 on atomic physics and human knowledge. Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge (Original in: Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist, P. A. Schilpp (Ed.). 1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N. (1987b) Unity of knowledge. In: Bohr N. (eds) The philosophical writings of Niels Bohr, Vol. II: Essays 1932–1957 on atomic physics and human knowledge.. Ox Bow Press, Woodbridge, p (Original in: The Unity of Knowledge, New York, 1955)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock S. (2003) Niels Bohr’s philosophy of quantum physics in the light of the Helmholtzian tradition of theoretical physics. Logos Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer E. (1902) Leibniz’ system in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen. Marburg, NG Elwert’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer E. (1910) Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff. Bruno Cassirer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1953). The philosophy of symbolic forms, Vol. 1: Language (R. Manheim, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Cassirer, E. (1953/1954a). Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Vol. 1: Die Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Originally published 1923).

  • Cassirer, E. (1953/1954b). Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Vol. 2: Das mythische Denken. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Originally published 1925).

  • Cassirer E. (1953/1954c). Philosophie der symbolischen Formen, Vol. 3: Phänomenologie der Erkenntnis. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft. (Originally published 1929).

  • Cassirer, E. (1955). The philosophy of symbolic forms, Vol. 2: Mythical thought (R. Manheim, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Cassirer, E. (1956a). Der Begriff der symbolischen Form im Aufbau der Geisteswissenschaften. Wesen und Wirkung des Symbolbegriffs. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

  • Cassirer E. (1956b) Wesen und Wirkung des Symbolbegriffs. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1957). The philosophy of symbolic forms, Vol. 3: The phenomenology of knowledge (R. Manheim, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Cassirer E. (1961) Zur Logik der Kulturwissenschaften. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt (Originally published 1942)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer E. (1964a) Determinismus und Indeterminismus in der modernen Physik. Historische und systematische Studien zum Kausalproblem. In: Cassirer E. (eds) Zur modernen Physik. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt (Original in: Göteborgs Högskolas Årsskrift XLII, Göteborg 1936)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer E. (1964b) Zur Einstein’schen Relativitätstheorie. Erkenntnistheoretische Betrachtungen. In: Cassirer E. (eds) Zur modernen Physik. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt (Originally published 1921)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer E. (1964) Zur modernen Physik. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer E. (1985a) Das Symbolproblem und seine Stellung im Aufbau der Philosophie. In: Cassirer E.(eds) Symbol, Technik, Sprache. Felix Meiner, Hamburg (Original in: Zeitschrift für Ästhetik und allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft, Vol. XXI, 1927)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer E. (1985b) Mythischer, ästhetischer und theoretischer Raum. In: Cassirer E. (eds) Symbol Technik Sprache.. Felix Meiner, Hamburg (Originally published 1931)

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhem P. (1906) La théorie physique, son objet et sa structure. Chevalier et Rivière, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari M. (1996) Ernst Cassirer: Dalla scuola di Marburgo alla filosofia della cultura. Firenze, L.S. Olschki

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg S. (1984) Understanding relativity. Origin and impact of a scientific revolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihmig K.-N. (1997) Cassirers Invariantentheorie der Erfahrung und seine Rezeption des ‘Erlanger Programms’. F. Meiner Verlag, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1968). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Werkausgabe by Wilhelm Weischedel (Vols. 3 & 4). Frankfurt am Main: Rowohlt. (A-edition published 1781, B-edition published 1787).

  • Krois J.M. (1987) Cassirer. Symbolic forms and history. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto W.F. (1958) Parmenides. In: Otto W.F., Grassi E., Plamböck G. (eds) Sämtliche Werke. Hamburg, Meiner

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré H. (1968) La science et l’hypothèse. Flammarion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine W.V.O. (1951) Two dogmas of empiricism. Philosophical Review, 60: 20–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz-Rigal C. (2002) Die Kunst offenen Wissens. Ernst Cassirers Epistemologie und Deutung der modernen Physik. Meiner, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz-Rigal C. (2004) Modi des Symbolischen und plurale Sinnwelten. Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 29(3): 249–261

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiane Schmitz-Rigal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmitz-Rigal, C. Science and Art: physics as a symbolic formation. Synthese 179, 21–41 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9630-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9630-9

Keywords

Navigation