Abstract
In this paper, a new account of empirical claims in structuralism is developed. Its novelty derives from the use that is made of the linguistic approach to scientific theories despite the presumed incompatibility of structuralism with that approach. It is shown how the linguistic approach can be applied to the framework of structuralism if the semantic foundations of that approach are refined to do justice to the doctrine of indirect interpretation of theoretical terms. This doctrine goes back to Carnap but has been advanced until the present day without a proper semantic explanation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreas, H. (2007). Carnaps Wissenschaftslogik. Eine Untersuchung zur Zweistufenkonzeption. Paderborn: Mentis.
Andreas, H. (2009). A modal view of the semantics of theoretical sentences. Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-009-9458-3.
Balzer W., Moulines C.U. (2000) Introduction. In: Balzer W., Moulines C.U., Sneed J. (eds) Structuralist knowledge representation. Paradigmatic examples. Rodopi., Amsterdam, pp 3–18
Balzer W., Moulines C.U., Sneed J. (1987) An architectonic for science. The structuralist program. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht
Carnap R. (1937) The logical syntax of language. Routledge, London
Carnap R. (1939) Foundations of logic and mathematics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Carnap R. (1956) The methodological character of theoretical concept. In: Feigel H., Scriven M. (eds) Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science I. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 38–76
Carnap R. (1958) Beobachtungssprache und theoretische Sprache. Dialectica 12: 236–248
Ludwig G. (1978) Die Grundstrukturen einer physikalischen Theorie. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Moulines C.U. (1996) Structuralism: The basic ideas. In: Balzer W., Moulines C.U. (eds) Structuralist theory of science. Focal issues, new results. deGruyter, Berlin-New York, pp 1–13
Ramsey F.P. (1950) Theories. In: Braithwaite R.B. (eds) The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays. Humanities Press, New York, pp 212–236
Scheibe E. (1982) A comparison of two recent views on theories. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 3(2): 233–253
Sneed J. (1979) The logical structure of mathematical physics. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht
Stegmüller W. (1976) The structure and dynamics of theories. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg
Tuomela R. (1973) Theoretical concepts. Springer-Verlag, Wien
van Fraassen B. (1969) Presuppositions, supervaluations and free logic. In: Lambert K. (eds) The logical way of doing things. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 67–91
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Andreas, H. New account of empirical claims in structuralism. Synthese 176, 311–332 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9561-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9561-5