Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Behe M.J. (2000) Self-organization and irreducibly complex systems: A reply to Shanks and Joplin. Philosophy of Science 67: 155–162
Branch G. (2006) Defending the teaching of evolution: Strategies and tactics for activists. In: Scott E.C, Branch G. (eds) Not in our classrooms: Why intelligent design is wrong for our schools. Beacon Press, Boston, pp 130–152
Branch G. (2007) Understanding creationism after Kitzmiller. BioScience 57(3): 278–284
Branch G., Scott E.C. (2009) The latest face of creationism. Scientific American 300(1): 92–99
Chapman M. (2007) Forty days and forty nights: Darwin, intelligent design, God, Oxycontin and other oddities on trial in Pennsylvania. HarperCollins, New York
Conkin P.K. (1998) When all the gods trembled. Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield
Davis P.W., Kenyon D. (1993) Of pandas and people (2nd ed). Dallas, Foundation for Thought and Ethics
de Camp L.S. (1968) The great monkey trial. Garden City, NY, Doubleday
Forrest B., Gross P.R. (2004) Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The wedge of intelligent design. Oxford University Press, New York
Holmes B. (2000) Take me to your leader. New Scientist 166(2235): 40–43
Humes E. (2007) Monkey girl: Evolution, education, religion, and the battle for America’s soul. Ecco, New York
Johnson P. (1996) Is genetic information irreducible?. Biology and Philosophy 11: 535–538
Kitcher P. (1983) Abusing science: The case against creationism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Larson E.J. (1997) Summer for the gods: The Scopes trial and America’s continuing debate over science and religion. Basic Books, New York
Lebo L. (2008) The devil in Dover: An insider’s story of dogma v. Darwin in small-town America. New Press, New York
Lewis D. (1983) Introduction. In: Lewis D. (eds) Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press, New York
Matzke N. (2009) But isn’t it creationism? The beginnings of intelligent design in the midst of the Arkansas and Louisiana legislation. In: Pennock R.T., Ruse M. (eds) But is it science? The philosophical question in the creation/evolution controversy. Amherst, NY, Prometheus Books, pp 377–413
Matzke N.J., Gross P.R. (2006) Analyzing critical analysis: The fallback anti-evolutionist strategy. In: Scott E.C., Branch G. (eds) Not in our classrooms: why intelligent design is wrong for our schools. Beacon Press, Boston, pp 28–56
Moreland J.P. (2008) Intelligent design and the nature of science. In: House H.W. (eds) Intelligent design 101. Grand Rapids, MI, Kregel, pp 43–65
[NSTA] National Science Teachers Association. (2005). Survey indicates science teachers feel pressure to teach nonscientific alternatives to evolution. http://www.nsta.org/about/pressroom.aspx?id=50377. (press release).
Overbye, D. (2005, November 15). Philosophers notwithstanding, Kansas school board redefines science. The New York Times, F3.
Pennock R.T. (1999) Tower of Babel: The evidence against the new creationism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Pennock, R.T., Ruse, M. (eds) (2009) But is it science? The philosophical question in the creation/evolution controversy. Amherst, NY, Prometheus Books
Ruse M. (1983) Creation-science is not science. In: La Follette M.C. (eds) Creationism, science, and the law: The Arkansas case. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 150–160
Ruse M. (2005) The evolution–creation struggle. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Scott E.C. (1997) NABT statement on evolution evolves. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 17(4): 4–5
Slack G. (2007) The battle over the meaning of everything: Evolution, intelligent design, and a school board in Dover, PA. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Whitehead A.N. (1925) Religion and science. Atlantic Monthly 136: 200–207
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Branch, G. Introduction. Synthese 178, 171–176 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9548-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9548-2