Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does matter really matter? Computer simulations, experiments, and materiality

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of recent discussions comparing computer simulation and traditional experimentation have focused on the significance of “materiality.” I challenge several claims emerging from this work and suggest that computer simulation studies are material experiments in a straightforward sense. After discussing some of the implications of this material status for the epistemology of computer simulation, I consider the extent to which materiality (in a particular sense) is important when it comes to making justified inferences about target systems on the basis of experimental results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Callender C., Cohen J. (2006) There is no special problem of scientific representation. Theoria 55: 67–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressman G. (1996) The origin and rise of numerical weather prediction. In: Fleming J.R. (eds) Historical essays on meteorology 1919–1995.. American Meteorological Society, Boston, pp 21–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling D. (1999) Experimenting on theories. Science in Context 12(2): 261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galison P. (1997) Image and logic. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Guala F. (2002) Models, simulations, and experiments. In: Magnani L., Nersessian N. (eds) Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values.. Kluwer, New York, pp 59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Guala F. (2005) The methodology of experimental economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I. (1983) Representing and intervening. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann S. (1996) The world as a process. In: Hegselmann R., Troitzsch K., Mueller U. (eds) Modelling and simulation in the social sciences from the philosophy of science point of view. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 77–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys P. (1994) Numerical experimentation. In: Humphreys P. (eds) Patrick Suppes: Scientific philosopher Vol. 2. Kluwer, Boston, pp 103–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller E.F. (2003) Models, simulation, and ‘computer experiments’. In: Radder H. (eds) The philosophy of scientific experimentation. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 198–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan M. (2002) Model experiments and models in experiments. In: Magnani L., Nersessian N. (eds) Model-based reasoning: Science, technology, values. Kluwer, New York, pp 41–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. (2003). Experiments without material intervention: Model experiments, virtual experiments and virtually experiments. In H. Radder (Ed.), The philosophy of scientific experimentation (pp. 216–235). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

  • Morgan M. (2005) Experiments versus models: New phenomena, inference, and surprise. Journal of Economic Methodology 12(2): 317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nebeker F. (1995) Calculating the weather: Meteorology in the 20th century. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton S., Suppe F. (2001) Why atmospheric modeling is good science. In: Miller C., Edwards P.N. (eds) Changing the atmosphere: Expert knowledge and environmental governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 67–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberkampf W., Trucano T., Hirsch C. (2004) Verification, validation, and predictive capability in computational engineering and physics. Applied Mechanics Reviews 57(5): 345–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker W.S. (2008) Computer simulation through an error-statistical lens. Synthese 163(3): 371–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radder H. (1996) In and about the world: Philosophical studies of science and technology. SUNY Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrlich F. (1991) Computer simulation in the physical sciences. In: Fine A., Forbes M., Wessels L. (eds) PSA 1990 Vol. 2. East Lansing, Philosophy of Science Association, pp 507–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon H. (1969) The sciences of the artificial. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondo S. (1999) Models, simulations, and their objects. Science in Context 12(2): 247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiles J.E. (1993) Experiment as intervention. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44(3): 463–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsberg E. (1999) Sanctioning models: The epistemology of simulation. Science in Context 12(2): 275–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsberg E. (2003) Simulated experiments: Methodology for a virtual world. Philosophy of Science 70: 105–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward J. (2003) Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Philosophy, Ohio University, Ellis Hall 202, Athens, OH, 45701, USA

    Wendy S. Parker

Authors
  1. Wendy S. Parker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy S. Parker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parker, W.S. Does matter really matter? Computer simulations, experiments, and materiality. Synthese 169, 483–496 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9434-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9434-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation