Abstract
According to Alberto Coffa in The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap, Kant’s account of mathematical judgment is built on a ‘semantic swamp’. Kant’s primitive semantics led him to appeal to pure intuition in an attempt to explain mathematical necessity. The appeal to pure intuition was, on Coffa’s line, a blunder from which philosophy was forced to spend the next 150 years trying to recover. This dismal assessment of Kant’s contributions to the evolution of accounts of mathematical necessity is fundamentally backward-looking. Coffa’s account of how semantic theories of the a priori evolved out of Kant’s doctrine of pure intuition rightly emphasizes those developments, both scientific and philosophical, that collectively served to undermine the plausibility of Kant’s account. What is missing from Coffa’s story, apart from any recognition of Kant’s semantic innovations, is an attempt to appreciate Kant’s philosophical context and the distinctive perspective from which Kant viewed issues in the philosophy of mathematics. When Kant’s perspective and context are brought out, he can not only be seen to have made a genuinely progressive contribution to the development of accounts of mathematical necessity, but also to be relevant to contemporary issues in the philosophy of mathematics in underappreciated ways.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison H. (1973) The Kant–Eberhard controversy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Allison H. (1983) Kant’s transcendental idealism. Yale University Press, New Haven
Anderson R. (2004) It adds up after all: Kant’s philosophy of arithmetic in light of the traditional logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69: 501–540 doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2004.tb00517.x.
Benacerraf P. (1973) Mathematical truth. The Journal of Philosophy 70: 661–680 doi:10.2307/2025075.
Bolzano B. (1972) The theory of science (trans: George, R.). Blackwell, Oxford
Carson E. (1997) Kant on intuition in geometry. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27: 489–512
Coffa A. (1991) The semantic tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge University Press, New York
Friedman M. (1992) Kant and the exact sciences. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Hanna R. (2001) Kant and the foundations of analytic philosophy. Clarendon, Oxford
Heath T. (1956) The thirteen books of Euclid’s elements (Vol. 1). Dover, New York
Hilbert D. (1971) Foundations of geometry (trans: Unger, L.). Open Court, La Salle, IL
Hume D. (1977) An enquiry concerning human understanding. Hackett, Indianapolis
Kant I. (1910) Kant gasammelte Schriften. G. Relmer, Berlin
Kant I. (1964) Critique of pure reason (trans: Kemp-Smith, N.). St. Martins Press, New York
Kant, I. (1977). Prolegomena to any future metaphysics (trans: Carus, P., revised: Ellington, J.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
Kant, I. (1992). Theoretical philosophy, 1755–1770 (trans. and Ed. Walford, D.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Loemker, L. (eds) (1969) Philosophical papers and letters. Reidel, Dordrecht
Mancosu P. (2008) Introduction. In: Mancosu P.(eds) The philosophy of mathematical practice.. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Manders K. (1995) The Euclidean diagram. Unpublished typescript. Reprinted. In: Mancosu P.(eds) The philosophy of mathematical practice.. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Proust J. (1989) Questions of form: Logic and the analytic proposition. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis
Shabel L. (2002) Mathematics in Kant’s critical philosophy: Reflection on mathematical practice. Routledge, New York
Shabel L. (2006) Kant’s philosophy of mathematics. In: Guyer P.(eds) Cambridge companion to Kant and modern philosophy. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 94–128
Strawson P. (1989) The bounds of sense. Routledge, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goodwin, W.M. Coffa’s Kant and the evolution of accounts of mathematical necessity. Synthese 172, 361–379 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9397-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9397-4