Abstract
The examples of dynamic supertasks analyzed to date in the philosophical literature, in which both determinism and the classical laws of conservation of energy and momentum are violated, all share the important limitation of requiring material systems of infinite mass. This paper demonstrates that this limitation is not necessary. This has important consequences for the scope and meaning of such violations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alper J.S., Bridger M., Earman J. and Norton J.D. (2000). ‘What is a Newtonian System? The Failure of Energy Conservation and Determinism in Supertasks’. Synthese 124: 281–293
Earman J. (1986). A Primer on Determinism. Reidel, Dordrecht
Norton J.D. (1999). ‘A Quantum Mechanical Supertask’. Foundations of Physics 29: 1265–1302
Pérez Laraudogoitia J. (1996). ‘A Beautiful Supertask’. Mind 105: 81–83
Pérez Laraudogoitia J. (1998). ‘Some Relativistic and Higher Order Supertasks’. Philosophy of Science 65: 502–517
Pérez Laraudogoitia J. (2002). ‘Just as Beautiful but not (Necessarily) a Supertask’. Mind 111: 281–287
Pérez Laraudogoitia J. (2003). ‘An Infinite System with Gravitation’. Synthese 135: 339–346
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laraudogoitia, J.P. Avoiding Infinite Masses. Synthese 156, 21–31 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-2212-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-005-2212-6