Abstract
We present a cut-admissible system for the modal logic S5 in a formalism that makes explicit and intensive use of deep inference. Deep inference is induced by the methods applied so far in conceptually pure systems for this logic. The system enjoys systematicity and modularity, two important properties that should be satisfied by modal systems. Furthermore, it enjoys a simple and direct design: the rules are few and the modal rules are in exact correspondence to the modal axioms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avron A. (1996). ‘The Method of Hypersequents in the Proof Theory of Propositional Non-classical Logics’. In: Hodges W., Hyland M., Steinhorn C., Truss J. (eds) Logic: From Foundations to Applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–32
Braüner T. ‘A cut-free Gentzen formulation of the modal logic S5’. in the Logic Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics 8(5):629–643, 2000.
Braüner, T., ‘Functional completeness for a natural deduction formulation of hybridized S5’, in P. Balbiani, N.-Y. Suzuki, F. Wolter and M. Zakharyaschev (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 4, King’s College Publications, 2003, pp. 31–49.
Brünnler, K., Deep Inference and Symmetry in Classical Proofs, PhD thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, 2003.
Fitting M. (1999). ‘A simple propositional S5 tableau system’. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 96:107–115
Gentzen G., ‘Investigations into logical deduction’, in M. E. Szabo (ed.), The Collected Papers of Gerhard Gentzen, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969, pp. 68–131.
Guglielmi, A., ‘A System of Interaction and Structure’, ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 8 (1):1–64, 2007. http://cs.bath.ac.uk/ag/p/SystIntStr.pdf
Guglielmi, A., and L. Strassburger, ‘Non-commutativity and MELL in the Calculus of Structures’, in L. Fribourg (ed.), CSL 2001, LNCS 2142, Springer-Verlag, 2001, pp. 54–68.
Hein, R., Geometric Theories and Modal Logic in the Calculus of Structures, Master Thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, 2005.
Hughes, G., and M. Cresswell, A New Introduction to Modal Logic, Routledge, 1996.
Indrzejczak A. (1998). ‘Cut-free Double Sequent Calculus for S5’. Logic Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics 6(3):505–516
Indrzejczak A. (1997). ‘Generalised Sequent Calculus for Propositional Modal Logics’. Logica Trianguli 1:15–31
Kahramanoğullari O. ‘Implementing System BV of the Calculus of Structures in Maude’, in L. Alonso i Alemany and P. Égré (eds.), Proceedings of the ESSLLI-2004 Student Session, 2004, pp. 117–127.
Kahramanoğullari, O., ‘Reducing Nondeterminism in the Calculus of Structures’, Technical Report WV-06-01, Technische Universität Dresden, 2006.
Kahramanoğullari, O., ‘System BV without the Equalities for Unit’, in C. Aykanat, T. Dayar and I. Korpeoglu (eds.), ISCIS’04, LNCS 3280, Springer-Verlag, 2004, pp. 986–995.
Kanger S. (1957). Provability in Logic. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm
Lemmon, E., and D. Scott An Introduction to Modal Logic. Oxford:Blackwell, 1977.
Mints, G., A Short Introduction to Modal Logic, CSLI Lecture Notes 30, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1992.
Mints, G., ‘Lewis’ systems and system T’, Selected Papers in Proof Theory, Bibliopolis, North-Holland, 1992, pp. 221–294.
Negri S. (2005). ‘Proof Analysis in Modal Logic’. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34:507– 544
Ohnishi, M., and K. Matsumoto, ‘Gentzen method in modal calculi’, parts I and II, Osaka Mathematical Journal9:113–130, 1957, and 11:115–120, 1959.
Orłowska E. (1996). ‘Relational Proof Systems for Modal Logics’. In: Wansing H. (eds.) Proof Theory of Modal Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 55–77
Pottinger G. (1983). ‘Uniform, Cut-free formulations of T, S4 and S5’, abstract. Journal of Symbolic Logic 48:900
Sato, M., ‘A Study of Kripke-type Models for Some Modal Logics by Gentzen’s Sequential Method’, Publications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, vol. 13, 1977, pp. 381–468.
Shvarts, G. F., ‘Gentzen style systems for K45 and K45D’, in A. R. Meyer and M. A. Taitslin (eds.), Logic at Botik’89, LNCS 363, Springer, Berlin, 1989, pp. 245– 256.
Simpson, A., The Proof Theory and Semantics of Intuitionistic Modal Logic, PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1994.
Stewart, C., and P. Stouppa ‘A systematic proof theory for several modal logics’ in R. Schmidt, I. Pratt-Hartmann, M. Reynolds and H. Wansing (eds.), Advances in Modal Logic, vol. 5, King’s College Publications, 2005, pp. 309–333.
Stouppa, P., The Design of Modal Proof Theories: the case of S5, Master Thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, 2004.
Strassburger, L., ‘A Local System for Linear Logic’, in M. Baaz and A. Voronkov (eds.), LPAR 2002, LNAI 2514, Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 388–402.
Wansing, H., Displaying Modal Logic, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.
Wansing H. (1998). ‘Translation of Hypersequents into Display Sequents’. Logic Journal of the Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics 6 (5):719–733
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stouppa, P. A Deep Inference System for the Modal Logic S5. Stud Logica 85, 199–214 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-007-9028-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-007-9028-y