Skip to main content
Log in

A Bayesian method for identifying independent sources of non-random spatial patterns

  • Published:
Statistics and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Bayesian blind source separation (BSS) algorithm is proposed in this paper to recover independent sources from observed multivariate spatial patterns. As a widely used mechanism, Gaussian mixture model is adopted to represent the sources for statistical description and machine learning. In the context of linear latent variable BSS model, some conjugate priors are incorporated into the hyperparameters estimation of mixing matrix. The proposed algorithm then approximates the full posteriors over model structure and source parameters in an analytical manner based on variational Bayesian treatment. Experimental studies demonstrate that this Bayesian source separation algorithm is appropriate for systematic spatial pattern analysis by modeling arbitrary sources and identify their effects on high dimensional measurement data. The identified patterns will serve as diagnosis aids for gaining insight into the nature of physical process for the potential use of statistical quality control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apley D.W. and Shi J. 2001. A factor analysis method for diagnosing variability in multivariate manufacturing processes. Technometrics 43: 84–95.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Apley D.W. and Lee H.Y. 2003. Identifying spatial variation patterns in multivariate manufacturing processes: A blind separation approach. Technometrics 45: 220–235.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Attias H. 2000. A variational bayesian framework for graphical models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS) 12: 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew D.J. and Knott M. 1999. Latent Variable Models and Factor Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell A. and Sejnowski T. 1995. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation 7(6): 1129–1159.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso J.F. 1999. High-order contrasts for independent component analysis. Neural Computation 11: 157–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ceglarek D. and Shi J. 1996. Fixture failure diagnosis for autobody assembly using pattern recognition. ASME Journal of Engineering for Industry 118: 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comon P. 1994. Independent component analysis: A new concept? Signal Processing 36(3): 287–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corduneanu A. and Bishop C.M. 2001. Variational Bayesian model selection for mixture distributions. In: Jaakkola T. and Richardson T. (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 27–34.

  • Dempster A.P. et al. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 39: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo M.A. and Jain A.K. 2002. Unsupervised learning of finite mixture models. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24: 381–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelman A. et al. 2000. Bayesian Data Analysis, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haykin S. 2000. Unsupervised Adaptive Filtering, vol. 1, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyvarinen A. 1999. Survey on independent component analysis. Neural Computing Surveys 2: 94–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyvarinen A. and Oja E. 2000. Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications. Neural Networks 13: 411–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J.E. 1980. Principal components and factor analysis: Part I—principal components. Journal of Quality Technology 12: 201–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J.E. 1981. Principal components and factor analysis: Part II—additional topics related to principal components. Journal of Quality Technology 13: 46–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson R.A. and Wichern D.W. 2002. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, 5th edn., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.

  • Jordan M.I. and Jacobs R.A. 1994. Hierarchical mixtures of experts and the EM algorithm. Neural Computation 6: 181–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jutten C. and Herault J. 1991. Blind separation of sources, Part I: An adaptive algorithm based on a neuromimetic architecture. Signal Processing 24: 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knuth K.H. 1998. Bayesian source separation and localization. SPIE'98 Proceedings: Bayesian Inference for Inverse Problems 3459: 147–158, San Diego.

  • Lee T.W. et al. 2000. ICA mixture models for unsupervised classification of non-gaussian classes and automatic context switching in blind signal separation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 22: 078–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKay D.C. 1996. Maximum likelihood and covariant algorithms for independent component analysis, Technical report, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University.

  • McLachlan G. and Peel D. 2000. Finite Mixture Models, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulines E. et al. 1997. Maximum likelihood for blind separation and deconvolution of noisy signals using mixture models. Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 5: 3617–3620.

  • Pearlmutter B.A. and Parra L.C. 1997. Maximum likelihood blind source separation: A context-sensitive generalization of ICA. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9: 613–619, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe D.B. 2002. A bayesian approach to blind source separation. Journal of Interdisciplinary Mathematics 5: 49–76.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Roweis S. and Ghahramani Z. 1999. A unifying review of linear gaussian models. Neural Computation 11(2): 305–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tipping M.E. and Bishop C.M. 1999. Probabilistic principal component analysis. Journal of Royal Statistical Society B 61: 611–622.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tong L. et al. 1990. AMUSE: A new blind identification algorithm. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems 3: 1784–1787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wax M. and Sheinvald J. 1997. A least-squares approach to joint diagonalization. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 4: 52–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, F., Mallick, B. & Weng, Z. A Bayesian method for identifying independent sources of non-random spatial patterns. Stat Comput 15, 329–339 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-005-4075-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11222-005-4075-6

Keywords

Navigation