Skip to main content
Log in

A Conceptual Model of Systems Thinking Leadership in Community Colleges

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pluralistic and often competing goals of myriad constituents, the changing demographics of students, the uncertainty of funding, and the growing demands for accountability from stakeholders have increased the complexity of systems which community college leaders must manage. Emerging from the recent literature on community colleges is a call for new models of leadership in the context of leading in an increasingly uncertain and complex environment. Systems thinking offers a means to help leaders respond to these growing organizational complexities and move leadership from a traditional bureaucratic model to a more adaptive model. A systematic review of literature on systems thinking’s application to organizational performance in higher education was bolstered with evidence from healthcare. Findings revealed three reoccurring ways in which leaders apply systems thinking processes for improving organizational performance. A conceptual model for systems thinking leadership is proposed in which the three processes, characterized as discovery, framing, and action, can be enacted either individually or sequentially for enhancing organizational performance. The model draws upon boundary critique, critical systems thinking, systemic intervention, total systems intervention, systems dynamics, soft systems methodology, complexity theory and complex adaptive systems, yet uses language more readily identifiable to community college practitioners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (2006) Why few organizations adopt systems thinking. Syst Res Behav Sci 23(5):705–708. doi:10.1002/sres.791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfred RL (2008) Governance in strategic context. New Dir Community Coll 2008(141):79–89. doi:10.1002/cc.317

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred RL (2012) Leaders, leveraging, and abundance: competencies for the future. New Dir Community Coll 2012(159):109–120. doi:10.1002/cc.20031

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfred RL, Shults C, Jaquette O, Strickland S (2009) Community colleges on the horizon: challenge, choice, or abundance. Rowman & Littlefield Education, Lantham

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association of Community Colleges (AACC) (2014) Community college fast facts. Retrieved January 20, 2015 from http://www.aacc.nche.edu/AboutCC/Pages/fastfactsfactsheet.aspx

  • Amey MJ (2005) Leadership as learning: conceptualizing the process. Community Coll J Res Pract 29(9–10):689–704. doi:10.1080/10668920591006539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson P (1999) Complexity theory and organization science. Organ Sci 10(3):216–232. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers DF (2002) Developing climates for renewal in the community college: a case study of dissipative self-organization. Community Coll J Res Pract 26(2):165–185. doi:10.1080/106689202753385492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banathy BH (1999) Systems thinking in higher education: learning comes to focus. Syst Res Behav Sci 16(2):133–145. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199903/04)16:2<133:AID-SRES281>3.0.CO;2-T

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett-Page E, Thomas J (2009) Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol 9(59):1–11. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-9-59

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Morse S (2013) How people use rich pictures to help them think and act. Syst Pract Action Res 26(4):331–348. doi:10.1007/s11213-012-9236-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon E, Neumann A (1993) Redesigning collegiate leadership. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensimon EM, Neumann A, Birnbaum R (1989) Making sense of administrative leadership: The “L” word in higher education. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 31(6). George Washington University, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bento F (2010) Organizational complexity and departmental leadership: Perceptions of leadership and teaching/learning in a US research-intensive academic department. Afr J Bus Manag 4(8):1510–1518

  • Betts R (1992) How systems thinking applies to education. Educ Leadersh 50(3):38–41

  • Birnbaum R (1988) How colleges work: the cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum R (1989) The cybernetic institution: toward an integration of governance theories. High Educ 18(2):239–253. doi:10.1007/BF00139183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs GR (2003) Leadership context for the twenty-first century. New Dir Community Coll 2003(123):15–25. doi:10.1002/cc.118

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee E (2009) Contagious ideas from healthcare. Trusteeship 17(6):18–23

  • Checkland P (2000) Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective. Syst Res Behav Sci 17:11–58. doi:10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<:AID-SRES374>3.3.CO;2-F

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen CM, Eyring HJ (2011) The innovative university: changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1970) Operations research as a profession. In: Midgley G (ed) Systems thinking, vol 3. Sage, London, pp 218–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers P (1998) Complexity and postmodernism: understanding complex systems. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cilliers P (2000) What can we learn from a theory of complexity? Emergence 2(1):23–33. doi:10.1207/S15327000EM0201_03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clancy TR, Effken JA, Pesut D (2008) Applications of complex systems theory in nursing education, research, and practice. Nurs Outlook 56(5):248. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2008.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke S, Lehaney B (2000) Mixing methodologies for information systems development and strategy: a higher education case study. J Oper Res Soc 51:542–556. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen AM, Brawer FB (2008) The American community college, 5th edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Córdoba JR, Midgley G (2006) Broadening the boundaries: an application of critical systems thinking to IS planning in Colombia. J Oper Res Soc 57(9):1064–1080. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debowski S, Blake V (2007) Collective capacity building of academic leaders: a university model of leadership and learning in context. Int J Learn Change 2(3):307–324. doi:10.1504/ijlc.2007.017116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley KJ (1997) A complex adaptive systems model of organization change. Nonlinear Dyn Psychol Life Sci 1(1):69–97. doi:10.1023/A:1022375910940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy PL (2003) Sensemaking on campus: how community college presidents frame change. Community Coll J Res Pract 27(6):453–471. doi:10.1080/713838185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy PL (2010) Community college leadership: a multidimensional model for leading change. Stylus, Sterling

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy PL (2012) A holistic perspective of leadership competencies. New Dir Community Coll 2012(159):29–39. doi:10.1002/cc.20024

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood RL, Jackson MC (eds) (1991) Critical systems thinking: directed readings. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster-Fishman P, Nowell B, Yang H (2007) Putting the system back into systems change: a framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems. Am J Community Psychol 39(3–4):197–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gell-Mann M (1994) Complex adaptive systems. In: Cowan G, Pines D, Meltzer D (eds) Complexity: metaphors, models, and reality. Volume XIX of Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Addison Wesley, Reading, pp 17–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilstrap DL (2009) A complex systems framework for research on leadership and organizational dynamics in academic libraries. Portal-Librar Acad 9(1):57–77. doi:10.1353/pla.0.0026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory WJ, Midgley G (2000) Planning for disaster: developing a multi-agency counseling service. J Oper Res Soc 5(3):278–290. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston D, Robertson T, Prebble T (2008) Exploring quality in a university department: perspectives and meanings. Qual High Educ 14(3):209–223. doi:10.1080/13538320802507463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ison R (1999) Applying systems thinking to higher education. Syst Res Behav Sci 16(2):107–112. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199903/04)16:2<107:AID-SRES278>3.3.CO;2-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson MJ (1991) Systems methodology for the management sciences. Plenum Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins D (2007) Institutional effectiveness and student success: a study of high- and low-impact community colleges. Community Coll J Res Pract 31(12):945–962. doi:10.1080/03601270701632057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JW (1993) Healthcare and higher education: a chilling parallel. Educom Rev 28(5):42–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapsali M (2011) Systems thinking in innovation project management: a match that works. Int J Proj Manag 29(4):396–407. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar A (1998) Exploring new avenues for leading community colleges: the paradox of participatory models. Community Coll Rev 25(4):75–87. doi:10.1177/009155219802500407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar A (2000) Pluralistic leadership: incorporating diverse voices. J High Educ 71(6):722–743. doi:10.2307/2649160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar A (2006) Redesigning for collaboration in learning initiatives: an examination of four highly collaborative campuses. J High Educ 77(5):804–838. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch I, Braun H, Yamamoto K, Sum A (2007) America’s perfect storm: three forces changing our nation’s future. Educational Testing Service. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Education_Topics/pdf/AmericasPerfectStorm.pdf

  • Levin JS, Cox EM, Cerven C, Haberler Z (2010) The recipe for promising practices in community colleges. Community Coll Rev 38(1):31–58. doi:10.1177/0091552110374505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marion R, Uhl-Bien M (2001) Leadership in complex organizations. Leadersh Q 12(4):389–418. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00092-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroulis SS, Guimerà RR, Petry HH, Stringer MJ, Gomez LM, Amaral LN, Wilensky UU (2010) Complex systems view of educational policy research. Science 330(6000):38–39. doi:10.1126/science.1195153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel RR (2007) Management strategies for complex adaptive systems: sensemaking, learning, an improvisation. Perform Improv Q 20(2):21–42. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2007.tb00438.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (1996) What is this thing called CST? In: Flood RL, Romm NRA (eds) Critical systems thinking: current research and practice. Springer, New York, pp 11–24. doi:10.1007/978-0-585-34651-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (2000) Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (2006) Systemic intervention for public health. Am J Public Health 96(3):466–472. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.067660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G, Munlo I, Brown M (1998) The theory and practice of boundary critique: developing housing services for older people. J Oper Res Soc 49(5):467–478. doi:10.1038/sj.jors.2600531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers J, White L (2010) A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science. Eur J Oper Res 207(3):1147–1161. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petticrew M, Roberts H (2006) Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, Petticrew M, Arai L, Britten N, Rodgers M, Britten N, Roen K, Duffy S (2006) Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: final report. Swindon: ESRC Methods Programme, www.esrc.ac.uk/ESRCInfoCentre/index.aspx

  • Richardson KA, Cilliers P, Lissack M (2001) Complexity science: a “gray” science for the “stuff in between”. Emergence 3(2):6–18. doi:10.1207/S15327000EM0302_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roueche JE, Richardson MM, Neal PW, Roueche SD (eds) (2008) The creative community college: leading change through innovation. Community College Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM (1990) The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Random House Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM, Kleiner A, Roberts C, Ross RB, Smith BJ (1994) The fifth discipline fieldbook: strategies and tools for building learning organizations. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Solberg LI, Klevan DH, Asche SE (2007) Crossing the quality chasm for diabetes care: the power of one physician, his team, and systems thinking. J Am Board Fam Med 20(3):299–306. doi:10.3122/jabfm.2007.03.060132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somerville MM, Schader B, Huston ME (2005) Rethinking what we do and how we do it: systems thinking strategies for library leadership. Aust Acad Res Libr 36(4):214–227

  • Sterman JD (2001) System dynamics modeling: tools for learning in a complex world. Calif Manag Rev 43(4):8–25

  • Suba EJ, Murphpy SK, Donnelly AD, Furia LM, Huynh MLD, Raab SS (2006) Systems analysis of real-world obstacles to successful cervical cancer prevention in developing countries. Am J Public Health 96(3):480–487. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.061606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan M (2004) The promise of appreciative inquiry in library organizations. Libr Trends 53(1):218–229

  • Temel T (2004) A systems approach to malaria control: an institutional perspective. Health Policy 71(2):161–180. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien M, Marion R (2009) Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: a meso model. Leadersh Q 20(4):631–650. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien M, Marion R, McKelvey B (2007) Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadersh Q 18(4):298–318. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W (1983) Critical heuristics of social planning: a new approach to practical philosophy. Haupt, Berne

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich W, Reynolds M (2010) Critical systems heuristics. In: Reynolds M, Howell S (eds) Systems approaches to managing change: a practical guide. Springer, London, pp 243–292

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wallin DL (2010) Looking to the future: change leaders for tomorrow’s community colleges. New Dir Community Coll 2010(149):5–12. doi:10.1002/cc.390

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren L, Adman P (1999) The use of critical systems thinking in designing a system for a university information systems support service. Inf Syst J 9(3):223–242. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2575.1999.00058.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watba U, Farmer E (2006) Challenges confronting community college deans. Community Coll J Res Pract 30(3):243–251. doi:10.1080/10668920500322350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts GE, Hammons JO (2002) Leadership development for the next generation. New Dir Community Coll 2002(120):59. doi:10.1002/cc.90

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman IM, Vaughan GB (2007) The community college presidency: 2006, executive summary. Retrieved from American Association of Community College website: http://www.aacc.nche.edu/Publications/Briefs/Pages/rb091420071.aspx

  • Whitney D, Cooperrider DL (1998) The appreciative inquiry summit: overview and applications. Employ Relat Today 25(2):17–28. doi:10.1002/ert.3910250203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolstenholme E (1993) Examination of interface of elderly patients from community to hospital to community care managed by two entities (National Health Service and Personal Social Services). J Oper Res Soc 44(9):925–934

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Powel Davis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davis, A.P., Dent, E.B. & Wharff, D.M. A Conceptual Model of Systems Thinking Leadership in Community Colleges. Syst Pract Action Res 28, 333–353 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9340-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-015-9340-9

Keywords

Navigation