Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Attribution Theory: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Information Systems Success

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Information systems research often employs user satisfaction with, use of, and perceived organizational benefits of, newly-developed systems as measures of information system success. Further, this stream of research attempts to associate these measures of success with a myriad of hypothesized determinants involving organizational, personal, task, and system characteristics, as well as characteristics of the implementation process. Initial research in this area was criticized for the dearth of theoretical underpinning employed. Subsequent to these criticisms, underlying theory from a variety of disciplines now guides much of this research. Of particular interest to this research effort are the tenets of a well-established theory in the area of social psychology-attribution theory. While attribution theory has been employed in some of the more recent works investigating factors related to information system success, none of these works simultaneously consider the theory’s information and motivational antecedents along with the success/failure nature of the system’s outcomes, users’ perceptions of the causes of the outcomes (attributions), and the reported level of user satisfaction with the system. In response, the current study develops a model for the simultaneous empirical examination of these issues by incorporating them into a behavioral decision making methodology administered to Professional MBA students. The study’s results support the relevance of attribution theory as a theoretical framework for understanding those factors determining users’ attributions for information system-related outcomes, as well as the influence of these attributions and the nature of the system outcome on the level of users’ satisfaction with the system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdinnour-Helm S, Chaparro B, Farmer S (2005) Using the end-user computing satisfaction (EUCS) instrument to measure satisfaction of web-based systems. Decis Sci 36(2):341–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler S (1980) Self-esteem and causal attributions for job satisfaction and dissatisfaction. J Appl Psychol 65(3):327–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson S, Baggett L, Widener S (2009) The impact of service operations failures on customer satisfaction: evidence on how failures and their source affect what matters to customers. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 11(1):52–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrington CE, Bailey CD, Hopwood WS (1985) An attribution analysis of responsibility assessment for audit performance. J Account Res 23(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barki H, Hartwick J (1989) Rethinking the concept of user involvement. MIS Q 13(1):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat I, Zmud R (2003) The identity crisis within ghe IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Q 27(2):183–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation–confirmation model. MIS Q 25(3):351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogumil DD (2001) Attribution and reciprocity in international relations: the attribution reciprocity model. N Am J Psychol 3(3):463

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis F, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeBrabander B, Edstrom A (1977) Successful information system development projects. Manag Sci 24(2):191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone W, McLean E (1992) Information system success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res 3(1):60–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone W, McLean E (2003) The DeLone and McClean model of information system success: a 10-year update. J Manag Inf Syst 19(4):9–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon AL (2001) Successful and unsuccessful sales calls: measuring salesperson attributions and behavioral intentions. J Mark 65(3):64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles JS, Wigfield A (2002) Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu Rev Psychol 53(1):109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang E, Evans K, Landry T (2005) Control systems’ effect on attributional processes and sales outcomes: a cybernetic information-processing perspective. Acad Mark Sci 33(4):553–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franz CR, Robey D (1986) Organizational context, user involvement, and the usefulness of information systems. Decis Sci 17:329–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginzberg MJ (1979) A study of the implementation process. TIMS Stud Manag Sci 13:85–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue D (1995) Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Manag Sci 41(12):1827–1844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue D, Klein B, Salvatore T (2000) User evaluation of IS as surrogates for objective performance. Inf Manag 38(2):87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PD, West SG, Reneau JH (1988) Initial attributions and information-seeking by superiors and subordinates in production variance investigations. Account Rev 63(2):307–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider F (1958) The psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh P (2012) Why e-Return services fail: a psychological contact violation approach. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 15(12):655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ives B, Olson MH (1984) User involvement and MIS success: a review of research. Manag Sci 30(5):586–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa S, Shaw T, Staples D (2004) Toward contextualized theories of trust: the role of trust in global virtual teams. Inf Syst Res 15(3):250–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones EE, Davis KE (1965) From acts to dispositions: the attribution process in person perception. Adv Exp Psychol 2:219–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan SE, Reckers PM (1985) An examination of auditor performance evaluation. Account Rev 60(3):477–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsten R (2002) An analysis of IS professional and end user causal attributions for user-system outcomes. J End User Comput 14(4):51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley HH (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (University of Nebraska Press) pp. 192–240

  • Kelley HH, Michela JL (1980) Attribution theory and research. Annu Rev Psychol 31:457–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khayun V, Ractham P, Firpo D (2012) Assessing e-Excise success with DeLone and McLean’s Model. J Comput Inf Syst 52(3):31–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Malhotra N (2005) A longitudinal model of continued IS use: an integrated view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena. Manag Sci 51(5):741–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamb R, Kling R (2003) Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Q 27(2):197–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Magal S, Snead K (1993) The role of causal attributions in explaining the link between user participation and information system success. Inf Res Manag J 1993 6(3):8–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Marakas G, Johnson R, Palmer J (2000) A theoretical model of differential social attributions toward computing technology: when the metaphor becomes the model. Int J Hum Comput Stud 52(4):719–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DT (1976) Ego involvement and attributions for success and failure. J Pers Soc Psychol 34:901–906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller DT, Ross M (1975) Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: fact or fiction? Psychol Bull 82:313-225

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan G, Pan S, Newman M (2007) Information systems project post-mortems: insights from an attribution perspective. J Am Soc Inf Syst Technol 58(14):2255–2268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson D, Kim C, Kim J, Tamura T (2002) The perceptions of information systems designers from the United States, Japan, and Lorea on success and failure factors. Int J Manag 22:421–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter C, Devaraj S, Daewon S (2013) A test of two models of value creation in virtual communities. J Manag Inf Syst 30(1):261–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and mew media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P, Fischhoff B, Lichtenstein S (1977) Behavioral decision theory. Annu Rev Psychol 28:1–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snead K, Harrell A (1994) An application of expectancy theory to explain manager’s intention to use a decision support system. Decis Sci 4:499–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snead K, Ndede-Amadi A (2002) Attributional biases as a source of conflict between users and analysts in an information system development context-hypotheses development. J Syst Pract Action Res 15(5):353–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stajkovic AD, Sommer SM (2000) Self-efficacy and causal attributions: direct and reciprocal links. J Appl Soc Psychol 30(4):707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing C, Guilfoyle A, Lin C, Love P (2006) The attribution of success and failure in IT projects. Ind Manag Data Syst 106(8):1148–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson EB (1974) Management information systems: appreciation and involvement. Manag Sci 21(2):178–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson EB (1982) Measuring user attitudes in MIS research: a review. Omega 10(2):157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson SR, Kelley SW (2001) Attributions and outcomes of the service recovery process. J Mark Theory Pract 9(4):50

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes T, Venkatesh V, Gosain S (2009) Model of acceptance with peer support: a social network perspective to understand employees system use. MIS Q 33(2):371–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait P, Vessey I (1988) The effect of user involvement on system success: a contingency approach. MIS Q 12(1):91–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher J, Zimmer J, Gundlach M, McKnight D (2008) Internal and external dimensions of computer self-efficacy: an empirical examination. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 55(4):628–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tosi H, Rizzo J, Carroll S (1986) Managing organizational behavior. A Longman Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis F (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Benasat I (2008) Attributions of trust in decision support technologies: a study of recommendation agents for E-commerce. J Manag Inf Syst 24(4):249–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wastell DG (1999) Learning dysfunctions in information systems development: overcoming the social defenses with transitional objects. MIS Q 23(4):581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weary G, Stanley MA, Harvey JH (1989) Attribution. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner B (1974) Achievement motivation and attribution theory. General Learning Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner B, Heckhausen H, Cook R (1972) Causal ascriptions and achievement behavior: a conceptual analysis of effort and reanalysis of locus of control. J Pers Soc Psychol 21(2):239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi M, Jackson J, Park J, Probst J (2006) Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: toward an integrated view. Inf Manag 43(3):350–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman M (1979) Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: the motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. J Pers 47:245–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Business, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, 43403-0262, USA

    Ken C. Snead Jr.

  2. Seidman College of Business, Grand Valley State University, Grand Rapids, MI, USA

    Simha R. Magal

  3. School of Business, Christian Brothers University, Memphis, TN, USA

    Linda F. Christensen

  4. School of Business and Management Studies, Kenya Polytechnic University College, Nairobi, Kenya

    Atieno A. Ndede-Amadi

Authors
  1. Ken C. Snead Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simha R. Magal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Linda F. Christensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Atieno A. Ndede-Amadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken C. Snead Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Snead, K.C., Magal, S.R., Christensen, L.F. et al. Attribution Theory: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding Information Systems Success. Syst Pract Action Res 28, 273–288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-014-9328-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-014-9328-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation