Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Kotter’s Eight Stage Process to Manage an Organisational Change Program: Presentation and Practice

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Kotter’s eight stage process for creating a major change is one of the most widely recognised models for change management, and yet there are few case studies in the academic literature that enquire into how this process has been used in practice. This paper describes a change manager’s action research enquiring into the use of this Process to manage a major organisational change. The change was initiated in response to the organisation’s ageing workforce, introducing a knowledge management program focusing on the interpersonal aspects of knowledge retention. Although Kotter’s process emphasises a top-led model for change, the change team found it was necessary to engage at many levels of the organisation to implement the organisational change. The process is typically depicted as a linear sequence of steps. However, this image of the change process was found to not represent the complexity of the required action. Managing the change required the change team to facilitate multiple concurrent instances of Kotter’s process throughout the organisation, to re-create change that was locally relevant to participants in the change process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham M, Sullivan T, Griffin D (2002) Implementing NAGPRA: the effective management of legislated cange in museums. Manag Decis 40:35–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansari S, Bell J (2009) Five easy pieces: a case study of cost management as organizational change. J Account Organ Change 5:139–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum S, Habashy S, Malo J, Shafiq H (2012) Back to the future: revisiting Kotter’s 1996 change model. J Manag Dev 31:764–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brisson-Banks C (2010) Managing change and transitions: a comparison of different models and their commonalities. Library Manag 31:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan D (1993) Review of ‘a strategy of change: concepts and controversies in the management of change’. J Manag Stud 30:684–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke R, Ng E (2006) The changing nature of work and organizations: implications for human resource management. Hum Res Manag Rev 16:86–94

    Google Scholar 

  • By R (2005) Organisational change management: a critical review. J Change Manag 5:369–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao G, McHugh M (2005) A systemic view of change management and its conceptual underpinnings. Syst Pract Action Res 18:475–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao G, Clarke S, Lehaney B (2004) The need for a systemic approach to change management—a case study. Syst Pract Action Res 17:103–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey M, Payne W, Eime R (2012) Organisational readiness and capacity building strategies of sporting organisations to promote health. Sport Manag Rev 15:109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cegielski C, Hall D, Rebman C (2006) Enterprise resource planning systems implementation success. Int J Inf Syst Change Manag 1:301–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Champion D (2007) Managing action research: the PEArL framework. Syst Pract Action Res 20:455–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P (2003) From optimizing to learning: a development of systems thinking for the 1990s. In: Midgley G (ed) Systems thinking, Volume III. Sage, London, pp 290–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Holwell S (1998) Action research: its nature and validity. Syst Pract Action Res 11:9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Howell S (1998) Information, systems and information systems—making sense of the field. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Scholes J (1990) Soft systems methodology in action. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi S, Holmberg I, Lowstedt J, Brommels M (2011) Executive management in radical change—the case of the Karolinska University Hospital merger. Scand J Manag 27:11–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole M, Harris S, Bernerth J (2006) Exploring the implications of vision, appropriateness, and execution of organizational change. Leadersh Organ Dev J 27:352–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton S, Hodge J, Mishra J (1996) Transition-ready or not: the ageing of America’s work force. Public Pers Manag 25:243–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford L, Morris P, Thomas J, Winter M (2006) Practitioner development: from trained technicians to reflective practitioners. Int J Project Manag 24:722–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day M, Atkinson D (2004) Large-scale transitional procurement change in the aerospace industry. J Purch Supply Manag 10:257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLong D (2004) Lost knowledge: confronting the threat of an aging workforce. Oxford University Press, Cary

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denning S (2001) The springboard. Butterworth-Heinmann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (2010) Employment outlook for financial and insurance services. Australian Government, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood R (1999) Rethinking the fifth discipline: learning within the unknowable. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Goede M (2011) Globalization of small islands: the role models of Curacao. Int J Commer Manag 21:192–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P (2011) Leading innovation change—the Kotter way. Int J Innov Sci 3:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay G, Beattie R, Livingstone R, Munro P (2001) Change, HRM and the voluntary sector. Empl Relat 23:240–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm J, Remington K (2005) Effective project sponsorship: an evaluation of the role of the executive sponsor in complex infrastructure projects by senior project managers. Proj Manag J 36:51–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillson D (2003) Extending the risk process to manage opportunities. Int J Proj Manag 20:235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2004) The nuclear power industry’s ageing workforce: Transfer of knowledge to the next generation (IAEA-TECDOC-1399). International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe M, Glynn S (2002) Facilitating change and empowering employees. J Change Manag 2:369–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotter J (1996) Leading change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter J (2005) Our iceberg is melting. St. Martlings Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter J (2008) A sense of urgency. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau F (1999) Toward a framework for action research in information systems studies. Inf Technol People 12:148–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard D, Swap W (2004) Deep smarts. Harv Bus Rev 82(9):88–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintukangas K, Peltola S, Virolainen V (2009) Some issues of supply management integration. J Purch Supply Manag 15:240–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubit R (2001) Tacit knowledge and knowledge management: the keys to sustainable competitive advantage. Org Dyn 29:164–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone D (2002) Knowledge management: a model for organizational learning. Int J Account Inf Syst 3:111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mento A, Jones R, Dirndorfer W (2002) A change management process: grounded in both theory and practice. J Change Manag 3:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G (2003) Science as systemic intervention: some implications of systems thinking and complexity for the philosophy of science. Syst Pract Action Res 16:77–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molineux J, Haslett T (2002) Working within organizational cycles—a more suitable way to manage action research projects in large organizations? Syst Pract Action Res 15:465–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitta K, Wrobel S, Howard J, Jimmerson-Eddings E (2009) Leading change of a school district organization. Public Perform Manag Rev 32:463–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen K, Myers M (1999) Trying to improve communication and collaboration with information technology: an action research project which failed. Inf Technol People 12:317–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paper D, Rodger J, Pendharkar P (2001) A BPR case study at Honeywell. Bus Process Manag J 7:85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer T, Schnitt R, Voigt T (2005) Managing change: quality-oriented design of strategic change processes. The TQM Mag 17:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan M (2005) Cultural revitalization movements in organization change management. J Change Manag 5:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pillay J, Hackney R, Braganza A (2012) Informing strategic IS change: towards a ‘meta-learning’ framework. J Strateg Inf Syst 21:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raineri A (2011) Change management practices: impact on perceived change results. J Bus Res 64:266–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reissner S, Pagan V, Smith C (2011) ‘Our iceberg is melting’: story, metaphor and the management of organisational change. Cult Organ 17:417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington K, Pollack J (2007) Tools for complex projects. Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberto M, Levesque L (2005) The change art of making initiatives stick. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 46:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Saka A (2003) Internal change agents’ view of the management of change problem. J Organ Change Manag 16:480–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran S and Tay B (2003) Action research models in business research. ANZSYS Conference. 1–19. Melbourne, Australia

  • Sarah R, Haslett T, Molineux J, Olsen J, Stephens J, Tepe S, Walker B (2002) Business action research in practice—a strategic conversation about conducting action research in business organizations. Syst Pract Action Res 15:535–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman R (2008) Lost knowledge: confronting the challenges of an aging nursing workforce. Nurse Lead 6:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikorko P (2008) Transforming library and higher education support services: can change models help? Library Manag 29:307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith I (2011) Organisational quality and organisational change: interconnecting paths to effectiveness. Library Manag 32:111–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer P, Clark C, Strohfus P, Belcheir M (2012) Using transformational change to improve organizational culture and climate in a school of nursing. J Nurs Educ 51:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart J, Kringas P (2003) Change management—strategy and values in six agencies from the Australian Public Service. Public Adm Rev 63:675–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swepson P (2003) Some common ground that can provide a basis for collaboration between action researchers and scientists: a philosophical case that works in practice. Syst Pract Action Res 16:99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H, Papoulias D (2005) Managing third-order change: the case of the Public Power Corporation in Greece. Long Range Plan 38:79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meer F (1999) Evaluation and the social construction of impacts. Evaluation 5:387–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West D, Stansfield M (2001) Structuring action and reflection in information systems action research studies using checkland’s FMA model. Syst Pract Action Res 14:251–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krail K (2005) Retaining the retiring nurse. Nurse lead 3(2):33–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Yauch C, Steudel H (2002) Cellular manufacturing for small businesses: key cultural factors that impact the conversion process. J Oper Manag 20:593–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Technology, Sydney, PO Box 123 Broadway, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia

    Julien Pollack

  2. Sydney, Australia

    Rachel Pollack

Authors
  1. Julien Pollack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rachel Pollack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien Pollack.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pollack, J., Pollack, R. Using Kotter’s Eight Stage Process to Manage an Organisational Change Program: Presentation and Practice. Syst Pract Action Res 28, 51–66 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-014-9317-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-014-9317-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation