Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Working Poor in Hong Kong

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In-work poverty is becoming an important category of poverty in many developed economies, where labour polarization and income disparity have trapped in poverty a growing number of people, particularly low-skilled workers, despite their active participation in the labour force. In Hong Kong, the government has acknowledged the seriousness of the problem and has made the working poor one of the main target groups of its poverty reduction strategy. Existing studies have identified various individual, employment and household factors that contribute to the poverty risk of households with working members. These factors operate through three mechanisms: low earnings, the lack of other earners in the household and high living costs related to the care of dependent members in the household. The relative importance of these mechanisms varies according to the socio-economic contexts of different societies. In order to formulate an effective poverty reduction policy, it is necessary to understand which mechanisms lead to in-work poverty in a local context. In this paper, we sought to identify the characteristics of households affected by in-work poverty, and the mechanisms that lead to such poverty, by analysing a data sample from the 2011 Hong Kong Population Census. The results show that low-paid work and the absence of a second earner in the household are the two main mechanisms that lead to in-work poverty in Hong Kong. The results also show that the risk of in-work poverty differs for high- and low-skilled labour. We propose that the government should strengthen the poverty reduction strategy by countering the income disparity in the labour market and adopting an integrated approach in the formulation of policy to improve the labour participation of working-poor households.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Residential childcare centres and special childcare centres also provide childcare services for children under the age of six, but these services are for moderately and severely disabled children or for children who cannot be adequately cared for by their families because of behavioural, emotional or relationship problems or family crises. Details of the childcare centres in Hong Kong are available at http://www.swd.gov.hk/en/index/site_pubsvc/page_family/sub_listofserv/id_childcares/.

References

  • Ambert, A. M. (2006). One parent families: Characteristics, causes, consequences, and issues. Ottawa: The Vanier Institute of the Family.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andress, H. J., & Lohmann, H. (2008). The working poor in Europe: Employment, poverty and globalization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D., Fullerton, A. S., & Cross, J. M. (2010). More than just nickels and dimes: A cross-national analysis of working poverty in affluent democracies. Social Problems, 57(4), 559–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchel, F., Mertens, A., & Orsini, K. (2003). Is mothers’ employment an effective means to fight family poverty? Empirical evidence from seven European countries. Luxembourg income study Working Papers Series no. 363. Luxembourg: LIS.

  • Burkhauser, R. V., Couch, K. A., & Glenn, A. J. (1995). Public policies for the working poor: The earned income tax credit versus minimum wage legislation. Discussion paper no. 1074-95. Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty.

  • Census and Statistics Department. (2012). 2011 Population census main report (Vol. 1). Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, K. C. K. (2015). Child poverty in Hong Kong single-parent families. Child Indicators Research, 8(3), 517–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, S. W. K., & Lui, T. L. (2004). Testing the global city-social polarisation thesis: Hong Kong since the 1990s. Urban Studies, 41(10), 1863–1888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, K. L., Cheung, K. C. K., Lau, M. K. W., & Sin, T. C. H. (2014). Trends in child poverty in Hong Kong immigrant families. Social Indicators Research, 117(3), 811–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chzhen, Y., & Bradshaw, J. (2012). Lone parents, poverty and policy in the European Union. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(5), 487–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Citizens Advice Bureau. (2008). Barriers to work: Lone parents and the challenges of working. London: Social Policy Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Freedom of Association. (1999). 311th Report of the Committee on freedom of association (Case no. 1942). Geneva: International Labour Organisation.

  • Cooke, G., & Lawton, K. (2008). Working out of poverty: a study of the low-paid and the ‘working poor’. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crettaz, E., & Bonoli, G. (2011). Worlds of working poverty: National variations in mechanisms. In N. Fraser, R. Gutiérrez, & R. Peña-Casas (Eds.), Working poverty in Europe: A comparative approach (pp. 46–69). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dafermos, Y., & Papatheodorou, C. (2012). Working poor, labour market and social protection in the EU: A comparative perspective. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 6(1/2), 71–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darity, J. W. A., & Mason, P. L. (1998). Evidence on discrimination in employment: Codes of color, codes of gender. The Journal of Economic Perspective, 12(2), 63–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H., & Joshi, H. (1998). Gender and income inequality in the UK 1968–1990: The feminization of earnings or of poverty. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 161(1), 33–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G., & Regini, M. (Eds.). (2000). Why deregulate labour markets? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2012). Employment and social developments in Europe 2011. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, D., & Fortin, M. (2006). When working is not enough to escape poverty: An analysis of Canada’s working poor. Government of Canada.

  • Formby, J. P., Bishop, J. A., & Kim, H. (2010). What’s best at reducing poverty? An examination of the effectiveness of the 2007 minimum wage increase. Washington, DC: Employment Policies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geishecker, I., & Görg, H. (2008). Winners and losers: A micro-level analysis of international outsourcing and wages. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 41(1), 243–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goerne, A. (2011). A comparative analysis of in-work poverty in the European Union. In N. Fraser, R. Gutiérrez, & R. Peña-Casas (Eds.), Working poverty in Europe: A comparative approach (pp. 15–45). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2010). 2009 Economic Background and 2010 Prospects. Hong Kong: Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2013a). Hong Kong poverty situation report 2012. Hong Kong: Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2013b). Poverty Line set for HK. http://www.news.gov.hk/en/categories/health/html/2013/09/20130927_191059.shtml.

  • Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2014a). 2014 policy address by chief executive. Hong Kong: Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2014b). First quarter economic reports. Hong Kong: Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw, D. (2011). What do we know about low-wage work and low-wage workers? Analysing the definitions, patterns, causes and consequences in international perspective. Conditions of work and employment Series no. 28. Geneva: International Labour Office.

  • Julian, T., & Kominski, R. (2011). Education and synthetic work-life earnings estimates—American community survey reports. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. C., & Liu, P. W. (1998). Immigration, population heterogeneity, and earnings inequality in Hong Kong. Contemporary Economic Policy, 16(3), 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. C., & Liu, P. W. (2002a). Earnings divergence of immigrants. Journal of Labor Economics, 20(1), 86–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. C., & Liu, P. W. (2002b). Relative returns to skills and assimilation of immigrants in Hong Kong. Pacific Economic Review, 7(2), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, K. C., & Liu, P. W. (2011). Increasing dispersion of skills and rising earnings inequality. Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(1), 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. M., & Wong, H. (2004). Marginalized workers in postindustrial Hong Kong. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 3(2), 249–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. M., Wong, H., & Law, K. Y. (2007). Social polarisation and poverty in the global city: The case of Hong Kong. China Report, 43(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legislative Council. (2009). Minutes of meeting (LC Paper no. CB(2)766/09-10). http://www.legco.gov.hk/yr09-10/english/panels/mp/minutes/mp20091119.pdf.

  • Liu, P. W., Zhang, J., & Chuen, C. S. (2004). Occupational segregation and wage differentials between natives and immigrants: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, H. (2009). Welfare states, labour market institutions and the working poor: A comparative analysis of 20 European countries. European Sociological Review, 25(4), 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, H., & Andreβ, H. J. (2008). Explaining in-work poverty within and across countries. In H. J. Andreβ & H. Lohmann (Eds.), The working poor in Europe: Employment, poverty and globalization. London: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lui, H. K. (2013). Widening income distribution in post-handover Hong Kong. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitre, B., Whelan, C. T., & Nolan, B. (2003). Female partner’s income contribution to the household income in the European Union. Institute for Social Economic Research Working Papers 2003-43. Colchester: University of Essex.

  • Marlier, E., & Ponthieux, S. (2000). Low wage employees in EU countries. Statistics in focus, population and social conditions. Paper no. 11. Brussels: Eurostat.

  • Marsh, A. (2001). Helping British lone parents get and keep paid work. In J. Millar & K. Rowlingson (Eds.), Lone parents, employment and social policy (pp. 11–36). Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, I., & Verbist, G. (1998). Low-paid work and poverty: a cross-country perspective. In S. Bazen, M. Gregory, W. Salverda (Eds.), Low-wage employment in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, I., & Verbist, G. (2008). Combating in-work poverty in Europe: The policy options assessed. In H.-J. Andreß & H. Lohmann (Eds.), The working poor in Europe: Employment, poverty and globalization (pp. 273–292). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, J., & Ridge, T. (2009). Relationships of care: Working lone mothers, their children and employment sustainability. Journal of Social Policy, 38, 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, B., & Marx, I. (2000). Low pay and household poverty. In M. Gregory (Ed.), Labour market inequalities: Problems and policies of low-wage employment in international perspective (pp. 100–199). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña-Casas, R., & Latta, M. (2004). Working poor in the European Union. Luxembourg: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sabia, J. J., & Nielsen, R. B. (2012). Can raising the minimum wage reduce poverty and hardship? New evidence from the survey of income and program participation. Washington: Employment Policies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strengmann-Kahn, W. (2003). Working but poor, analysis and social policy consequences. New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiss Federal Statistical Office. (2008). Bas salaires et working poor en Suisse. Neuchâtel: Swiss Federal Statistical Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, T. K. Y., Wan, P. S., & Law, K. W. K. (2010). The public’s changing perceptions of the condition of social welfare in Hong Kong: Lessons for social development. Social Policy and Administration, 44(5), 620–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Research Grant Council, Public Policy Research Funding Scheme (HKIEd 7005-PPR-12).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelvin Chi-Kin Cheung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheung, K.CK., Chou, KL. Working Poor in Hong Kong. Soc Indic Res 129, 317–335 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1104-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1104-5

Keywords

Navigation