Skip to main content
Log in

Why Do We Care About Having More than Others? Socioeconomic Determinants of Positional Concerns in Different Domains

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper uses survey data to provide empirical evidence regarding the importance of positional concerns in different domains and their determinants. In the survey, respondents are asked to choose between a world in which they have more of a good than others and a world in which their endowment along with everyone else is greatly improved, but they have less than others. Our results lend support to the claim that positional concerns play a crucial role in the decision-making process of individuals, though they appear to be more influential in some domains than others. Moreover, empirical results point out relationships between the age, gender, education, and income level of the respondents and their positional concerns in different domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2005). How much do we care about absolute versus relative income and consumption? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 56(3), 405–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besharov, G. (2002). Three questions about the economics of relative position: A response to Frank and Sunstein. Boston University Law Review, 82, 1241–1261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boskin, M. J., & Sheshinski, E. (1978). Optimal redistributive taxation when individual welfare depends upon relative income. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92, 589–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bougherara, D., Costa, S., Grolleau, G., & Ibanez, L. (2010). Can positional concerns enhance the private provision of public goods?  Working Papers, LAMETA, University of Montpellier.

  • Carlsson, F., Johansson-Stenman, O., & Martinsson, P. (2007). Do you enjoy having more than others? Survey evidence of positional goods. Economica, 74, 586–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, H. L., Mailath, G. J., & Postlewaite, A. (1992). Social norms, savings behavior, and growth. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1092–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duesenberry, J. S. (1948). Income—consumption relations and their implications. In L. A. Metzler et al. (Eds.),  Income, employment and public policy: Essays in honor of Alvin Hansen (pp. 45–81). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

  • Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, savings, and the theory of consumer behavior. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. David & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments. The Economic Journal, 108(448), 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1985a). Choosing the right pond: Human behavior and the quest for status. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1985b). The demand for unobservable and other nonpositional goods. American Economic Review, 75, 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1997). The frame of reference as a public good. Economic Journal, 107(445), 1832–1847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1999). Luxury fever: Money and happiness in an era of excess. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (2005). Positional externalities cause large and preventable welfare losses. American Economic Review, 95(2), 137–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (2007). Falling behind: How rising inequality harms the middle class. University of California Press.

  • Frank, R. H. (2011). The Darwin economy: Liberty, competition, and the common good. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H., Levine, A. S., & Dijk, O. (2014). Expenditure cascades. Review of Behavioral Economics, 1(1–2), 55–73.

  • Frank, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Cost-benefit analysis and relative position. University of Chicago Law Review, 68(2), 323–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (1958). The affluent society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, F. (1976). Social limits to growth. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • İlkkaracan, I., & Selim, R. (2007). The gender wage gap in the Turkish labor market. Labour, 21, 563–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, N. J. (2001). Optimal income tax in the presence of status effects. Journal of Public Economics, 81, 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1849/1969). Wage labour and capital, in (K. Marx & F. Engels), Selected Works Vol.1. Moscow: Progress Publishers.

  • Mill, J. S. (1848/1909). Principles of political economy: With some of their applications to social philosophy. London: Longmans, Green.

  • Neumark, D., & Postlewaite, A. (1998). Relative income concerns and the rise in married women’s employment. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 157–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schor, J. (1998). Work, free time and consumption. Time and Society, 7(1), 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1776/1937). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Random House.

  • Solnick, S. J., & Hemenway, D. (1998). Is more always better?: A survey on positional concerns. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 37, 373–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solnick, S. J., & Hemenway, D. (2005). Are positional concerns stronger in some domains than in others? American Economic Review, 95(2), 147–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solnick, S. J., Hong, L., & Hemenway, D. (2007). Positional goods in the United States and China. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(4), 537–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Griffın, D. (1991). Endowment and contrast in judgments of well-being. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwartz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: An interdisciplinary perspective (Vol. 21, pp. 101–118). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen,T. (1899/1912). The theory of the leisure class: An economic study of institutions. New York: Macmillan.

  • Zeckhauser, R. J. (1991). The strategy of choice. In R. J. Zeckhauser (Ed.), Strategy and Choice (pp. 1–21). Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Birdal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Birdal, M., Ongan, T.H. Why Do We Care About Having More than Others? Socioeconomic Determinants of Positional Concerns in Different Domains. Soc Indic Res 126, 727–738 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0914-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0914-9

Keywords

Navigation