Skip to main content
SpringerLink

Wellbeing as a Process of Accrual: Beyond Subjectivity and Beyond the Moment

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the notion of wellbeing is popular in contemporary literature, it is variously interpreted and has no common definition. Such inconsistencies in definition have particular relevance when considering wellbeing programs designed for children. By developing a broader conceptualisation of wellbeing and its key elements, the range of programs and services developed in the name of wellbeing will achieve a more consistent cross-disciplinary focus to ensure that the needs of the individual, including children, can more accurately be addressed. This paper presents a new perspective on conceptualising wellbeing. The authors argue that conceptualising wellbeing as an accrued process has particular relevance for both adults and children. A definition for accrued wellbeing is presented in an attempt to address some of the current deficiencies in existing understandings of an already complicated construct. The potential for the ideas presented when considering wellbeing as a process of accrual may have further application when considered beyond childhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, K. (2012). Childhood in crisis? Perceptions of 7–11 year olds on being a child and the implications for education’s well-being agenda. Education, 3–13, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2007). Young Australians: Their health and wellbeing. Cat. no PHE 87. Canberra: AIHW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camfield, L., Streuli, N., & Woodhead, M. (2009). What’s the use of ‘well-being’ in contexts of child poverty? Approaches to research, monitoring and children’s participation. International Journal of Children’s Rights, 17, 65–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, S., & Hanlon, P. (2008). Well-being’ as a focus for public health? A critique and defence. Critical Public Health, 18(3), 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, R. (2008) Well-being. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2008 Edn). In E. N. Zalta (Ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/well-being/.

  • Crivello, G., Camfield, L., & Woodhead, M. (2009). How can children tell us about their well-being? Exploring the potential of participatory research approaches within Young Lives. Social Indicators Research, 90, 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A. (2005). Caregivers as managers of subjective wellbeing: A homeostatic perspective. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 335–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Nistico, H. (2002) Maintaining life satisfaction: The role of positive cognitive bias. Journal of Happiness Studies [1389–4978], 3(1), 37–69.

  • Dear, K., Henderson, S., & Korten, A. (2002). Well-being in Australia: Findings from the National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being. Social Psychiatry Epidemiology, 37, 503–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and Well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 63–73). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2005). The non-obvious social psychology of happiness. Psychological Inquiry, 16(4), 162–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, R., Daly, A. P., Huyton, J., & Sanders, L. D. (2012). The challenge of defining wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 2(3), 222–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2007). Children’s conceptualization(s) of their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 80, 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraillon, J. (2004). Measuring student well-being in the context of Australian schooling: Discussion paper. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). Australia: ACER.

  • Gillett-Swan, J. K. (2013). Time to tell: The complexity of wellbeing from the perspective of tweens. Australian Catholic University, QLD (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).

  • Hanafin, S., Brooks, A.-M., Carroll, E., Fitzgerald, E., Nic Gabhainn, S., & Sixsmith, J. (2007). Achieving consensus in developing a national set of child well-being indicators. Social Indicators Research, 80, 79–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A., Myers, J. E., & Sweeney, T. J. (2004). A factor structure of wellness: Theory, assessment, analysis and practice. Journal of Counseling and Development, 82, 354–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Headley, B. W., & Wearing, E. J. (1991). Subjective wellbeing: A stocks and flows framework. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwartz (Eds.). Subjective Wellbeing: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 49–76). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

  • Hill, B. (2004). Core values in the balance. Paper presented at Research Conference 2004: Supporting Student Wellbeing. Adelaide, SA: ACER.

  • Hinman, L. M. (1978). Heidegger, Edwards and being-toward-death. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 16(3), 193–212. doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.1978.tb01338.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, N., & Sumner, A. (2009). Does mixed methods research matter to understanding childhood wellbeing? Social Indicators Research, 90, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., Uswatte, G., & Julian, T. (2006). Gratitude and hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in Vietnam war veterans. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(2), 177–199. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2005.01.005, ISSN 0005-7967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M. (2006). Subjective well-being in mental health and human development research worldwide: An introduction. Social Indicators Research, 77, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keyes, C. L. M., & Lopez, S. J. (2002). Toward a science of mental health: Positive directions in diagnosis and interventions. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 45–62). Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim-Prieto, C., Diener, E., Tamir, M., Scollon, C., & Diener, M. (2005). Integrating the diverse definitions of happiness: A time-sequential framework of subjective wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 261–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R. (2010). Aristotle’s ethics. Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. Retrieved from www. Plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/aristotle-ethics/.

  • La Placa, V., McNaught, A., & Knight, A. (2013). Discourse on wellbeing in research and practice. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(1), 116–125. doi:10.5502/ijw.v3i1.7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee, B. (2010). The story of philosophy. UK: Dorling-Kindersley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, F. (2005). Wellbeing concepts and challenges: Discussion Paper. Sustainable Development Research Network.

  • McNaught, A. (2011). Defining wellbeing. In A. Knight & A. McNaught (Eds.), Understanding wellbeing: An introduction for students and practitioners of health and social care (pp. 7–23). Banbury: Lantern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalos, A. C. (2008). Education, happiness and wellbeing. Social Indicators Research, 87, 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, A. (2004). Hedonism. Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/hedonism.

  • Morgan, A., Currie, C., Due, P., Gabhain, S. N., Rasmussen, M., Samdal, O., & Smith, R. (2007). Mental well-being in school-aged children in Europe: Associations with social cohesion and socioeconomic circumstances. In: Social cohesion for mental well-being among adolescents. Report of the 2007 WHO/HSBC Forum. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2008.

  • Nussbaum, M. (2003) Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of Emotions (2001) Cambridge University Press: USA.

  • O’Neill, J. (2006). Citizenship, well-being and sustainability: Epicurus or Aristotle? Analyse and Kritik, 28, 158–172. Retrieved from www.analyse-und-kritik.net/2006-2/AK_O_Neill_2006.pdf.

  • Pollard, E. L., & Lee, P. D. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 61, 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathi, N., & Rastogi, R. (2007). Meaning in life and psychological well-being in pre-adolescents and adolescents. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 33(1), 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. S., & Travis, J. W. (1981). Wellness workbook: Creating vibrant health! Alternatives to illness and burnout. Berkley, CA: Ten Speed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4(4), 99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. (1998). The contours of positive human health. Psychological Inquiry, 9(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, J. (2005). Young children’s perspectives of their place in the world: The value of an importance filter. University of New England, NSW (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).

  • Sargeant, J. (2007). Children being children: The value of an ‘importance filter’. Journal of Student Wellbeing, 1(1), 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargeant, J. (2008). Australian children: Locally secure, globally afraid? Humanities and Social Sciences Papers. Retrieved from http://epublications.bond.edu.au/hss_pubs/217.

  • Sargeant, J. (2014). Prioritising student voice: ‘Tween’ children’s perspectives on school success. Education, 3–13: International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 42(2), 190–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schickler, P. (2005). Achieving health or achieving wellbeing? Learning in Health and Social Care, 4(4), 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A new understanding of happiness and wellbeing. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1979). Development as freedom, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  • Shah, H., & Marks, N. (2004). A wellbeing manifesto for a flourishing society. London: The New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (2010). Everything is wellbeing: A critique and conceptual analysis on the emergent cultures of wellbeing in schools and the promise for inclusion. Paper presented at the European Conference on Educational Research, Helsinki, Finland, August 2010.

  • Weston, R. (1999). Finding happiness: Factors contributing to personal wellbeing. Family Matters: Australian Institute of Family Studies, 52, 54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, A. (2007). A global projection of subjective well-being: A challenge to positive psychology? Psychtalk, 56, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. (2008). Social minimum. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2008 Edn). In E. N. Zalta (Ed.) http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/social-minimum/.

  • World Health Organisation. (1946). Preable to the constitution of the World Health Organisation as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organisation, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia

    Jenna K. Gillett-Swan

  2. Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia

    Jonathon Sargeant

Authors
  1. Jenna K. Gillett-Swan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jonathon Sargeant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenna K. Gillett-Swan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gillett-Swan, J.K., Sargeant, J. Wellbeing as a Process of Accrual: Beyond Subjectivity and Beyond the Moment. Soc Indic Res 121, 135–148 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0634-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0634-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation