Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Another Look at the Comparisons of the Health Systems Expenditure Indicators

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For policy purposes expenditure in health systems of extremely different natures are often compared without having a clear question to be addressed in such a comparison. For instance, comparisons made among OECD countries which have differing levels of development, and/or where the fusion of public and private finance differ; along with their sources of revenue, their finance levels and their degree of taxes and co-payments. Our objective in this paper is to analyze the factors that complicate international comparisons of health care expenditure across countries. We comment on some of these issues and shows how results and the interpretation of the gaps differ according to the refinements we make to the sampling and sub-sampling, as well as the definition of the variables we adopt. We considered as dependent variables total and health care expenditure per capita and as a percentage of GDP with and without out-of-pocket payments. We analyse the (complete) OECD sample for the period 2000–2010, as well as three sub-samples (European Union, countries with the Bismark model and countries with the Beveridge model). After calculating the means of the dependent variables, both without weights and weighting by GDP and population, we specified two different panel data models to explain the variation in the dependent variables, including as explanatory variables those that are most likely to affect health expenditure. Although other countries are mentioned in this paper, we take Spain as our example. We show how the results and the consequent interpretations of the gaps can differ according to the refinements we introduce into the sample and sub-samples; akin to the adjustments we are willing to make to the definition of the variables we choose to adopt. We show how Spanish ratios, as example, are generally well above those expected. In conclusion, there is a need for a better understanding of the settings of any comparison, along with a more appropriate sub sampling of the systems being analyzed in order to align any demand to the financial capabilities of the health care sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, G. F., & Frogner, B. K. (2008). Health spending in OECD countries: Obtaining value per dollar. Health Affairs, 27(6), 1718–1727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. F., Frogner, B. K., & Reinhardt, U. E. (2007). Health spending in OECD countries in 2004: An update. Health Affairs, 26(5), 1481–1489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. F., Hurst, J., Hussey, P. S., & Jee-Hughes, M. (2000). Health spending and outcomes: Trends in OECD countries, 1960–1998. Health Affairs, 19(3), 150–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. F., & Hussey, P. S. (2001). Comparing health system performance in OECD countries. Health Affairs, 20(3), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H., & Moscone, F. (2010). Health care expenditure and income in the OECD reconsidered: Evidence from panel data. Economic Modelling, 27(4), 804–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, D. E., Cafiero, E. T., Jané-Llopis, E., Abrahams-Gessel, S., Bloom, L. R., Fathima, S., et al. (2011). The global economic burden of non-communicable diseases. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clairoux, N. (2012) Where is the best health care system in the world?.Medical Library Association (MLA) Annual Blog. http://npc.mlanet.org/mla12/?p=1322, last accessed on August 3, 2013.

  • Economic Policy Committee and the European Commission (2006). The impact of ageing on public expenditure: projections for the EU25 Member States on pensions, health care, long-term care, education and unemployment transfers (2004–2050). European Economy. Special Report no 1/2006.

  • EUROSTAT. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/search_database. Last accessed 3 August 2013.

  • Gerdtham, U. G., & Jönsson, B. (2000). International comparisons of health expenditure: Theory, data and econometric analysis. In A. J. Culyer & J. P. Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics (Vol. 1, pp. 11–53). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getzen, T. E. (2000). Health care is an individual necessity and a national luxury: Applying multilevel decision models to the analysis of health care. Journal of Health Economics, 19, 259–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, S. (2010) Health expenditure comparisons: Low, middle and high income countries. The Open Health Services and Policy Journal, 3, 111–117. http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tohspj/articles/V003/111TOHSPJ.pdf. Last accessed on 14 September 2013.

  • Hsiao, C., & Pesaran, M. H. (2008). Random coefficient panel data models. In L. Mátyás & P. Sevestre (Eds.), The econometrics of panel data. Advances studies in theoretical and applied econometrics (pp. 185–213). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C., Pesaran, M. H., & Tahmiscioglu, A. K. (1999). Bayes estimation of short-run coefficients in dynamic panel data models. In C. Hsiao, K. Lahiri, L. F. Lee, & M. H. Pesaran (Eds.), Analysis of panels and limited dependent variables models (pp. 268–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Jönsson, B., & Eckerlund, I. (2003). Why do different countries spend different amounts on health care? In A Disease-based Comparison of Health Systems. What is Best and What Cost? Paris: OECD, pp. 107–120. http://browse.oecdbookshop.org/oecd/pdfs/product/8103031e.pdf, st Accessed 16 January 2014.

  • Keep, M. (2011) Health Expenditure: International Comparisons. London: House of Commons Library, Standard Notes SN/SG/2584. http://www.parliament.uk/Templates/BriefingPapers/Pages/BPPdfDownload.aspx?bp-id=SN02584. Last accessed on 14 September 2013

  • Mesa, L. (2011). Determinants of health care expenditure: The Colombian case. Apuntes del CENES, 30(52), 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD Health Data 2001: A comparative analysis of 30 Countries, OECD, Paris, 2001, data sources, definitions and methods. http://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=1967. Last accessed on 14 September 2013.

  • OECD. (2006). Projecting OECD health and long-term care expenditures: what are the main drivers? Economics department Working papers 477. http://www.oecd.org/eco/public-finance/36085940.pdf. Last accessed 16 January 2014.

  • OECD (2010). Health care systems: Getting more value for money. OECD Economics Department Policy Notes No. 2. http://www.apha.org/NR/rdonlyres/7EE65F33-9F4E−4EBF-8554-DE29461A11F8/0/OECDhealthsystemscompare.pdf. Last accessed on 14 September 2013.

  • OECD Health Data. (2012). http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SHA. Last accessed on 3 August 2013.

  • OECD Factbook (2012) http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/oecd-factbook-2011-2012_factbook-2011-en. Last accessed on 3 August 2013.

  • Oliveira, J., & De la Maisonneuve, C.(2006). The drivers of public expenditure on health and long-termcare: an integrated approach. OECD Economic Studies 43.

  • Peterson, C. L., & Burton, R. (2007) U.S. Health Care Spending: Comparison with other OECD Countries. Washington DC: Congressional Research Service. digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/311/. Last accessed on 14 September 2013.

  • Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. (2000). Mixed-effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ISBN 3,900051,07,0. http://www.r-project.org/. Last accessed on 3 August 2013.

  • Reinhardt, U. E., Hussey, P. S., & Anderson, G. F. (2002). Cross-national comparisons of health systems using OECD data, 1999. Health Affairs, 21(3), 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rue, H., Martino, S., & Chopin, N. (2009) Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 71, 319–392. http://www.r-inla.org/papers. Last accessed on 3 August 2013.

  • Schrödle, B., & Held, L. (2011). A premier on disease mapping and ecological regression using INLA. Computational Statistics, 26(2), 241–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, D.A. (2011) The U.S. health system in perspective: A comparison of twelve industrialized nations. The Commonwealth Fund, July 2011, New York.

  • Squires, D. A. (2012). Explaining high health care spending in the United States: An international comparison of supply, utilization, prices, and quality. The Commonwealth Fund Publication, 1595(10), May 2012, New York http://www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/Files/Publications/Issue%20Brief/2012/May/1595_Squires_explaining_high_hlt_care_spending_intl_brief.pdf. Last accessed on September 14, 2013.

  • Sturm, R., An, R., Maroba, J., & Patel, D. (2013). The effects of obesity, smoking, and excessive alcohol intake on healthcare expenditure in a comprehensive medical scheme. South African Medical Journal, 103(11), 840–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The R-INLA project. http://www.r-inla.org/. Last accessed on 3 August 2013.

  • Thomson, S., Osborn, R., Squires, D. A., & Reed, S. J. (2011). International profiles of health care systems 2011. The Commonwealth Fund, Nov. 2011, New York.

  • World Health Organization. (2011). Global status report on non-communicable diseases 2010. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the comments of two anonymous reviewers that, without doubt, help us improve our work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Research in Health and Economics (CRES), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain

    Guillem Lopez-Casasnovas & Marc Saez

  2. Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain

    Guillem Lopez-Casasnovas

  3. Research Group on Statistics, Econometrics and Health (GRECS), University of Girona, Campus de Montilivi, 17071, Girona, Spain

    Laia Maynou & Marc Saez

  4. CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain

    Laia Maynou & Marc Saez

  5. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain

    Laia Maynou

  6. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

    Laia Maynou

Authors
  1. Guillem Lopez-Casasnovas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laia Maynou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marc Saez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Saez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lopez-Casasnovas, G., Maynou, L. & Saez, M. Another Look at the Comparisons of the Health Systems Expenditure Indicators. Soc Indic Res 121, 149–175 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0628-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0628-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation