Abstract
Parental occupation and education are used extensively in the analysis of socioeconomic inequalities in education and subsequent social and economic outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to examine if different ways of measuring socioeconomic background substantially alter substantive conclusions on cross-national differences in socioeconomic inequalities in student achievement. The effects of father’s occupational group are largely consistent across countries, with students from teaching backgrounds scoring very highly in many countries. Student performance by mother’s educational group is quite similar across countries although the relative performance of students whose mothers completed vocational education differs between countries. Notwithstanding these differences, continuous measures of father’s and mother’s occupation and education, and composite measures comprising combinations of these four indicators and additional indicators produce similar, but not identical, orderings of countries in terms of socioeconomic inequalities in student performance. However common single indicator measures, mother’s education and father’s occupation do not show a particularly high correspondence, cross-nationally. On theoretical and empirical grounds, the preferred measure is a composite of both parents’ occupation and education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For example, the intercorrelations of the indicators used in the this paper among students in OECD countries using the PISA 2000 data are as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1
Father’s occupation
1.00
0.37
0.46
0.30
0.27
0.16
0.26
0.28
2
Mother’s occupation
1.00
0.33
0.45
0.23
0.14
0.23
0.27
3
Father’s education
1.00
0.55
0.23
0.14
0.22
0.28
4
Mother’s education
1.00
0.23
0.12
0.21
0.28
5
Wealth (Possessions)
1.00
0.24
0.15
0.18
6
Educational resources
1.00
0.27
0.21
7
Cultural possessions
1.00
0.40
8
Books in the home
1.00
The correlations between the measures of socioeconomic used in this paper and student performance in mathematics or science are very close to those presented here for reading (results available on request).
In TIMSS the correlations between a weaker measure of mother’s education than that used here and mathematics achievement were highest in Hungary (0.28), Portugal (0.28), French-speaking Belgium (0.26) and the United States (0.23). The correlations are weakest in Norway (0.10), the Netherlands (0.10), Denmark (0.11), Iceland (0.14), Austria (0.15) and Sweden (0.16). However, there are differences between the TIMSS 1996 and PISA 2000 studies in the relative strength of the association for some countries, notably Denmark, the Netherlands and Germany.
References
Acock, A. C. (2005). Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 1012–1028.
Alford, R. R. (1963). Party and society: The Anglo-American democracies. New York: Rand McNally.
Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. In Quantitative applications in the social sciences (Vol. 136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelley, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years: IEA’s third international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Boston: Centre for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.
Beller, E. (2009). Why mothers matter in mobility research. American Sociological Review, 74(4), 507–528.
Blau, P., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: Wiley.
Bond, R., & Saunders, P. (1999). Routes to success: Influences on occupational attainment of young British males. British Journal of Sociology, 50, 217–249.
Bornstein, M. C., & Bradley, R. H. (Eds.). (2003). Socioeconomic status, parenting and child development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Borus, M. E., & Nestel, G. (1973). Response bias in reports of father’s education and socioeconomic status. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68(December), 816–820.
Brauns, H., & Steinmann, S. (1997). Educational reform in France, West-Germany, the United Kingdom and Hungary: Updating the CASMIN educational classification (No. 1–21). Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research (MZES).
Breen, R. (2004). Social mobility in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burawoy, M. (1977). Social structure, homogenization, and the process of status attainment in the United States and Great Britain. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 1031–1042.
Comber, L. C., & Keeves, J. P. (1973). Science education in nineteen countries: International studies in evaluation I. New York: Wiley.
Conley, D. (2001). Capital for college: Parental assets and postsecondary schooling. Sociology of Education, 74(1), 59–72.
Corak, M. (Ed.). (2005). Generational income mobility in North America and Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coser, L. A. (1975). Presidential address: Two methods in search of a substance. American Sociological Review, 40, 691–700.
Currie, C. E., Elton, R. A., Todd, J., & Platt, S. (1997). Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: The WHO health behaviour in school-aged children survey. Health Education Research, 12(3), 385–397.
Duncan, O. D. (1961). A socioeconomic index for all occupations. In A. J. J. Reiss (Ed.), Occupations and social structure (pp. 109–138). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L., & Duncan, B. (1972). Socioeconomic background and achievement. New York: Seminar Press.
Ehrenreich, B., & Ehrenreich, J. (1979). The professional managerial class. In P. Walker (Ed.), Between labour and capital (pp. 5–45). Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press.
Entwisle, D. R., & Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth’s race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development, 65(6), 1521–1540.
Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. (1992). The constant flux. A study in class mobility in industrial nations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Portocarero, L. (1979). Intergenerational class mobility in three western societies: England, France and Sweden. British Journal of Sociology, 30(4), 415–441.
Fejgin, N. (1995). Factors contributing to the academic excellence of American Jewish and Asian students. Sociology of Education, 68(1), 18–30.
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 international standard classification of occupations. Social Science Research, 25, 201–239.
Giddens, A. (1980). The class structure of advanced societies (Second ed.). London: Hutchinson and Co.
Grusky, D. B., & Sørensen, J. B. (1998). Can class analysis be salvaged? American Journal of Sociology, 103(5), 1187–1234.
Güveli, A., Need, A., & de Graaf, N. D. (2007). The rise of ‘New’ social classes within the service class in The Netherlands: Political orientation of social and cultural specialists and technocrats between 1970 and 2003. Acta Sociological, 50(2), 129–146.
Hauser, R. M., & Warren, J. R. (1997). Socioeconomic indexes for occupations: A review, update, and critique. Sociological Methodology, 27(1), 177–298.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: The Free Press.
Hodge, R. W. (1981). The measurement of occupational status. Social Science Research, 10(4), 396–415.
Hodge, R. W., Treiman, D. J., & Rossi, P. H. (1966). A comparison study of occupational prestige. In R. Bendix & R. Lipset (Eds.), Class, status, power (2nd ed.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Inkeles, A., & Rossi, P. H. (1956). National comparisons of occupational prestige. American Journal of Sociology, 61(4), 329–339.
Ishida, H., Muller, W., & Ridge, J. M. (1995). Class origin, class destination, and education: a cross- national study of ten industrial nations. American Journal of Sociology, 101(July), 145–193.
Jencks, C., Bartlett, S., Corcan, M., Crouse, J., Eaglesfield, D., Jackson, G., et al. (1979). Who gets ahead? The determinants of economic success in America. New York: Basic Books.
Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Ginitis, D., Heyns, B., et al. (1972). Inequality. A reassessment of family and schooling in America. New York: Basic Books.
Jones, F. L., & McMillan, J. (2001). Scoring occupational categories for social research: A review of current practice with Australian examples. Work, Employment and Society, 15(3), 539–563.
Juster, F. T., Smith, J. P., & Stafford, F. (1999). The measurement and structure of household wealth. Labour Economics, 6(1999), 253–276.
Kalmijn, M. (1994). Mother’s occupational status and children’s schooling. American Sociological Review, 59(2), 257–275.
Kingston, P. W. (2000). The classless society. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Korupp, S. E. (2000). Mothers and the process of social stratification. The Netherlands: Interuniversity Center for Social Science Theory and Methodology.
Kraus, V., Schild, E. O., & Hodge, R. W. (1978). Occupational prestige in the collective conscience. Social Forces, 56, 900–918.
Lien, N., Friestad, C., & Klepp, K. I. (2001). Adolescents’ proxy reports of parents’ socioeconomic status: How valid are they? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55(10), 731–737.
Lipset, S. M., & Zetterberg, H. (1959). Social Mobility in Industrial Societies. In S. M. Lipset & R. Bendix (Eds.), Social mobility in industrial society (pp. 11–75). London: Heinman.
Looker, E. D. (1989). Accuracy of proxy reports of parental status characteristics. Sociology of Education, 62(4), 257–276.
Marks, G. N., Headey, B., & Wooden, M. (2005). Household wealth in Australia: Its components, distribution and correlates. Journal of Sociology, 41(1), 47–68.
Marks, G. N., & McMillan, J. (2003). Declining inequality? The changing impact of socioeconomic background and ability on education in Australia. British Journal of Sociology, 54(4), 453–471.
McIntosh, S., & Vignoles, A. (2001). Measuring and assessing the impact of basic skills on labour market outcomes. Oxford Economic Papers, 3, 453–481.
McMillan, J., Beavis, A., & Jones, F. L. (2009). The AUSEI06: A new socioeconomic index for Australia. Journal of Sociology, 45(2), 123–149.
Morgan, S. L., & Kim, Y.-M. (2005). Inequality of conditions and intergenerational mobility: Changing patterns of educational attainment in the United States. In S. L. Morgan, D. B. Grusky, & G. S. Fields (Eds.), Mobility and inequality: Frontiers of research from sociology and economics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Müller, W., Lüttinger, P., König, W., & Karle, W. (1989). Class and education in industrial nations. International Journal of Sociology, 19, 3–39.
Murnane, R. J., Willett, J. B., & Levy, F. (1995). The growing importance of cognitive skills in wage determination. Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(2), 251–266.
OECD. (1999). Classifying educational programmes. Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2001). Knowledge and skills for life. First results from the 2000 OECD programme for international student assessment. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2002). PISA 2000 technical report. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2005). PISA 2003 data analysis manual: SAS users. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
OECD. (2007). Science competencies for tomorrow’s world (Vol. 1). Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Olneck, M. R., & Crouse, J. (1979). The IQ-meritocracy debate reconsidered. American Journal of Education, 88(1), 1–31.
Park, H. (2008). Home literacy environments and children’s reading performance: A comparative study of 25 countries. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(6), 489–505.
Purves, A. C. (1973). Literature education in ten countries. An empirical study. New York: Wiley.
Sewell, W. H., Haller, A. O., & Portes, A. (1969). The educational and early occupational attainment process. American Sociological Review, 34, 82–92.
Shavit, Y., Arum, R., & Gamoran, A. (2007). Stratification in higher education: A comparative study. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (1993). Persistent inequality. Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.
Sirin, S. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytical review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.
Sørensen, A. B. (1991). On the usefulness of class analysis in research on social mobility and socioeconomic inequality. Acta Sociological, 34(2), 71–87.
Tahlin, M. (2007). Class clues. European Sociological Review, 23(5), 557–572.
Teachman, J. D. (1987). Family background, educational resources, and educational attainment. American Sociological Review, 52, 548–557.
Thomson, S., Cresswell, J., & De Bortoli, L. (2004). Facing the future: A focus on mathematical literacy among Australian 15-year-old students in PISA 2003. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Treiman, D. J. (1977). Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. New York: Academic Press.
Treiman, D. J., & Yip, K.-B. (1989). Education and Occupational Attainment in 21 Countries. In M. L. Kohn (Ed.), Cross national research in sociology (Vol. Chapter 16, pp. 373–394). Newbury Park: Sage.
West, P., Sweeting, H., & Speed, E. (2001). We really do know what you do: A comparison of reports from 11-year olds and their parents in respect of parental economic activity and occupation. Sociology, 35(2), 539–560.
White, K. R. (1982). The relationship between socio-economic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 461–481.
White, S. B., Reynolds, P. D., Thomas, M. M., & Gitzlaff, N. J. (1993). Socioeconomic-status and achievement revisited. Urban Education, 28(3), 328–343.
Whitt, H. P. (1986). The sheaf coefficient: A simplified and expanded approach. Social Science Research, 15, 174–189.
Wright, E. O. (1985). Classes. London: Verso.
Wright, E. O. (1997). Class counts: Comparative studies in class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marks, G.N. Issues in the Conceptualisation and Measurement of Socioeconomic Background: Do Different Measures Generate Different Conclusions?. Soc Indic Res 104, 225–251 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9741-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9741-1