Abstract
Satellite gradiometry is an observation technique providing data that allow for evaluation of Stokes’ (geopotential) coefficients. This technique is capable of determining higher degrees/orders of the geopotential coefficients than can be achieved by traditional dynamic satellite geodesy. The satellite gradiometry data include topographic and atmospheric effects. By removing those effects, the satellite data becomes smoother and harmonic outside sea level and therefore more suitable for downward continuation to the Earth’s surface. For example, in this way one may determine a set of spherical harmonics of the gravity field that is harmonic in the exterior to sea level.
This article deals with the above effects on the satellite gravity gradients in the local north-oriented frame. The conventional expressions of the gradients in this frame have a rather complicated form, depending on the first-and second-order derivatives of the associated Legendre functions, which contain singular factors when approaching the poles. On the contrary, we express the harmonic series of atmospheric and topographic effects as non-singular expressions. The theory is applied to the regions of Fennoscandia and Iran, where maps of such effects and their statistics are presented and discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albertella A., Migliaccio F. and Sansò F., 2002. GOCE: The Earth field by space gradiometry. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 83, 1–15.
Balmino G., Perosanz F., Rummel R., Sneeuw N., Sünkel H. and Woodworth P., 1998. European Views on Dedicated Gravity Field Missions: GRACE and GOCE. Earth Sciences Division Consultation Document, ESA, ESD-MAG-REP-CON-001.
Balmino G., Perosanz F., Rummel R., Sneeuw N. and Suenkel H., 2001. CHAMP, GRACE and GOCE: Mission concepts and simulations. Bollettino di Geofisica Teoricae Applicata, 40, 309–320.
ESA, 1999. Gravity Field and Steady-State Ocean Circulation Mission, ESA SP-1233(1). Report for Mission Selection of the Four Candidate Earth Explorer Missions, ESA Publications Division, ESA, Noordwijk, ISBN 9290925280.
Heck B., 2003. On Helmert’s methods of condensation. J. Geodesy, 77, 155–170.
Heiskanen W. and Moritz H., 1967. Physical Geodesy. W.H. Freeman, San Fransisco.
Ilk K.H., 1983. Ein eitrag zur Dynamik ausgedehnter Körper-Gravitationswechselwirkung. Deutsche Geodätische Kommission, Reihe C, Heft Nr. 288, München.
Lemoine F.G., Kenyon S.C., Factor J.K., Trimmer R.G., Pavlis N.K., Chinn D.S., Cox C.M., Klosko S.M., Luthcke S.B., Torrence M.H., Wang Y.M., Williamson R.G., Pavlis E.C., Rapp R.H. and Olson T.R., 1998. The Development of the Joint NASE GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM96. NASA Technical Report NASA/TP-1996/8-206861, NASA, Greenbelt, Maryland, USA.
Li X., 2001a. Vertical resolution: Gravity versus vertical gravity gradient. The Leading Edge, 20, 901–904.
Li Y., 2001b. Processing Gravity Gradiometer Data Using an Equivalent Source Technique. Gravity and Magnetics Research Consortium, Department of Geophysics, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO (http://www.geophysics.mines.edu/cgem/pdf%20files/Li%20Processing GG%20Equivalent%20Source.pdf).
Li Y., 2001c. 3-D inversion of gravity gradiometer data. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 20, 1470–1473, doi: 10.1190/1.1816383.
Makhloof A., 2007. The Use of Topographic-Isostatic Mass Information in Geodetic Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Theoretical and Physical Geodesy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Martinec Z., Matyska C., Grafarend E.W. and Vaníček P., 1993. On Helmert’s 2nd condensation method. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 18, 417–421.
Martinec Z. and Vaníček P., 1994. Direct topographical effect of Helmert’s condensation for a spherical geoid. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 19, 257–268.
Mickus K.L. and Hinojosa J.H., 2001. The complete gravity gradient tensor derived from the vertical component of gravity: a Fourier transform technique. J. Appl. Geophys., 46, 159–274.
Novák P., 2000. Evaluation of Gravity Data for the Stokes-Helmert Solution to the Geodetic Boundary-Value Problem. Technical Report 207, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.
Novák P. and Grafarend E.W., 2006. The effect of topographical and atmospherical masses on spaceborne gravimetric and gradiomtric data. Stud. Geophys. Geod., 50, 549–582
Pawlowski B., 1998. Gravity gradiometry in resource exploration. The Leading Edge, 17, 51–52.
Petrovkaya M.S. and Vershkov A.N., 2006. Non-singular expressions for the gravity gradients in the local north-oriented and orbital reference frames. J. Geodesy, 80, 117–127.
Reed G.B., 1973. Application of Kinematical Geodesy for Determining the Short Wave Length Components of the Gravity Field by Satellite Gradiometry. Report No. 201, Department of Geodetic Science, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Reigber C., Jochmann H., Wünsch J., Petrovic S., Schwintzer P., Barthelmes F., Neumayer K.H., König R., Förste C., Balmino G., Biancale R., Lemoine J.M., Loyer S. and Perosanz F., 2004b. Earth gravity field and seasonal variability from CHAMP. In: Reigber C., Lühr H., Schwintzer P. and Wickert J. (Eds), Earth Observation with CHAMP-Results from Three Years in Orbit. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 25–30.
Sjöberg L.E., 1998. The ellipsoidal corrections to the topographic geoid effects. J. Geodesy, 77, 804–808.
Sjöberg L.E., 2000. Topographic effects by the Stokes-Helmert method of geoid and quasigeoid determinations. J. Geodesy, 74, 255–268.
Sjöberg L.E., 2007. Topographic bias by analytical continuation in physical geodesy. J. Geodesy, 81, 345–350.
Sjöberg L.E. and Nahavandchi H., 1999. On the indirect effect in the Stokes-Helmert method of geoid determination. J. Geodesy, 73, 87–93.
Tapley B., Ries J., Bettadpur S., Chambers D., Cheng M., Condi F., Gunter B., Kang Z., Nagel P., Pastor R., Pekker T., Poole S. and Wang F., 2005. GGM02-an improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE. J. Geodesy, 79, 467–478.
Tsoulis D., 2001. Terrain correction computations for a densly sampled DTM in the Bavarian Alps. J. Geodesy, 75, 291–307.
Wieczorek M.A., 2007. The gravity and topography of the terrestrial planets. In: Schubert G. (Ed.), Treatise on Geophysics, Vol. 10, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wild F. and Heck B., 2004a. A comparison of different isostatic models applied to satellite gravity gradiometry. In: Jekeli C., Bastos L. and Fernandes J. (Eds.), Gravity, Geoid and Space Missions. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, 129, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 230–235.
Wild F. and Heck B., 2004b. Effects of topographic and isostatic masses in satellite gravity gradiometry. In: Lacoste H. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International GOCE User Workshop, The Geoid and Oceanography. ESA SP-569, ESA Publications Division, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, ISBN: 92-9092-880-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eshagh, M., Sjöberg, L.E. Topographic and atmospheric effects on goce gradiometric data in a local north-oriented frame: A case study in Fennoscandia and Iran. Stud Geophys Geod 53, 61–80 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-009-0004-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-009-0004-z