Abstract
Our research examines whether intersecting racial and gender identities affect person perception. Predominantly White undergraduates (292) from a large northeastern U.S. university categorized and rated pictures (Study 1) and videos (Study 2) of Black and White men and women. We supported three hypotheses: 1) intersectionality affects person perception processes, leading to gender categorization errors for Black women; 2) “Blackness” and “maleness” are highly associated for Black male and female targets; and, 3) women are perceived as unattractive proportionally to their perceived masculinity, leading Black women to be rated as less attractive than other women. We suggest that intersectional approaches are required in order to fully understand person perception. Further, the Black/male association may lead to unique harms for Black women.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice: A comprehensive and penetrating study of the origin and nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Addison-Wesley.
Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. (1947). The psychology of rumor. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
Ambadi, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgement accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 32, (pp. 201–271)). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.
Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In R. Wyer, & T. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (vol. Vol. 1, (pp. 1–36)). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California.
Byrd, A. D., & Tharps, L. L. (2002). Hair story: Untangling the roots of Black hair in America. New York: St. Martin’s.
Crenshaw, K. L. (1993). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.
Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 61–72.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.
Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 1139–1150.
Eberhardt, J. L., Dasgupta, N., & Banaszynski, T. (2003). Believing is seeing: the effects of racial labels and implicit beliefs on face perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 360–370.
Estes, S. (2005). I am a man!: Race, manhood, and the Civil Rights Movement. Durham, NC: University of North Carolina.
Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York: NY: Guilford.
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 23, (pp. 1–74)). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Gilbert, D. E. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. E. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (vol. 2, pp. 89–150, 4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). Not yet human: implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 292–306.
Goff, P. A., Steele, C. M., & Davies, P. G. (2008). The space between us: stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 91–107.
Golby, A. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Chiao, J., & Eberhardt, J. L. (2001). Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 845–850.
Groom, C., Sherman, J. W., Lu, L., Conrey, F. R., & Keijzer, B. S. C. (2005). Judging compound social categories: compound familiarity and compatibility as determinants of processing mode. Social Cognition, 23, 291–323.
hooks, b. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. New York: South End.
Hull, G. T., Bell Scott, P., & Smith, B. (1982). But some of us are brave: All the women are White, all the Blacks are men: Black women’s studies. New York: Feminist.
Hunter, M. L. (2005). Race, gender, and the politics of skin tone. New York: Rutledge.
Hurston, Z. N. (1937). Their eyes were watching God. New York: Harper Perennial.
Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 616–626.
Katz, D., & Braly, K. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280–290.
Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 15387–15392.
Loury, G. C. (2002). The anatomy of racial inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Minear, M., & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 630–633.
Phelps, E. A., O’Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., et al. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 729–738.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stanton, E. C., Anthony, S. B., & Gage, M. J. (Eds.) (1881). History of Woman Suffrage. New York: Fowler & Wells.
Thomas, M. A., & Vescio, T. K. (2008). Interpersonal intrigue: Optimally distinct others In press.
White, D. G. (1985). Ar’n’t I a woman: Female slaves in the plantation South. New York: W. W. Norton.
Weitz, R., & Gordon, L. (1993). Images of Black women among Anglo college students. Sex Roles, 28, 19–34.
Acknowledgement
The authors thank Brooke Allison Lewis Di Leone for her assistance with the preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Goff, P.A., Thomas, M.A. & Jackson, M.C. “Ain’t I a Woman?”: Towards an Intersectional Approach to Person Perception and Group-based Harms. Sex Roles 59, 392–403 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9505-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9505-4