Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptualization of Romantic Love Among Adults with Down’s Syndrome

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study explored the way in which people with Down’s syndrome may conceptualize love. It was inspired from a study on the structure of the love schema conducted earlier on a sample of participants with typical development. Participants were presented with twelve scenarios that described the characteristics of one relationship in terms of (a) degree of passion (low, intermediate, and high), (b) degree of intimacy (low vs. high), and (c) degree of commitment (low vs. high). These scenarios were devised as a function of an orthogonal factorial design: Passion × Intimacy × Commitment, 3 × 2 × 2. Participants were asked to assess the overall level of romantic love experienced by the characters in the scenarios using a response scale that was adjusted to the people with Down’s syndrome’s cognitive characteristics. People with Down’s syndrome assessed the level of romantic love in the same way than people from the typical population: They were able to integrate the information about level of passion, level of intimacy, and level of commitment in a meaningful way. In addition, they were sensitive to the fact that the impact of degree of passion and degree of intimacy on romantic love can change as a function of the level of commitment considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aron, A., Westbay, L.: Dimensions of the prototype of love. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 70, 535–551 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sternberg, R.J.: A triangular theory of love. Psychol. Rev. 93, 119–135 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sternberg, R.J.: Construct validation of a triangular love scale. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 27, 313–335 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sternberg, R.J.: Searching for love. Psychologist 26, 98–101 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fletcher, G.J.O., Simpson, J.A., Thomas, G., Giles, L.: Ideals of intimate relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76, 72–89 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fehr, B.: Lay people’s conceptions of commitment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76, 90–103 (1999)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Regan, P.C.: Of lust and love: beliefs about the role of sexual desire in romantic relationships. Pers. Relationsh. 5, 139–157 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Anderson, N.H.: Unified psychology based on three laws of information integration. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 17, 125–132 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Falconi, A., Mullet, E.: Cognitive algebra of love through the adult life. Int. J. Aging Hum. Dev. 57, 277–292 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Overbeek, G., Ha, T., Scholte, R., de Kemp, R., Engels, R.C.M.E.: Intimacy, passion, and commitment in romantic relationships: validation of a ‘triangular love scale’ for adolescents. J. Adolesc. 30, 523–528 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rauer, A.J., Pettit, G.S., Lansford, J.E., Bates, J.E., Dodge, K.A.: Romantic relationship patterns in young adulthood and their developmental antecedents. Dev. Psychol. (2013). doi:10.1037/a0031845

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sumter, S.R., Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J.: Perceptions of love across the lifespan: differences in passion, intimacy, and commitment. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 37, 417–427 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barr, A.B., Culatta, E., Simons, R.L.: Romantic relationships and health among African American young adults: linking patterns of relationship quality over time to changes in physical and mental health. J. Health Soc. Behav. 54, 369–385 (2013)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiecolt-Glaser, J.K., Newton, T.L.: Marriage and health: his and hers. Psychol. Bull. 127, 472–503 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abbott, D., Burns, J.: What’s love got to do with it? Experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people with intellectual disabilities in the United Kingdom and views of the staff who support them. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 4, 27–39 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arias, B., Ovejero, A., Morentin, R.: Love and emotional well-being in people with intellectual disabilities. Span. J. Psychol. 12, 204–216 (2009)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Couture, G., Daigle, M.: Evaluation of an affection, love and sex education program for people with moderate intellectual disabilities. Eur. Psychiatr. 26, 899 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Löfgren-Mårtenson, L.: Love in cyberspace: Swedish young people with intellectual disabilities and the internet. Scand. J. Disabil. Res. 10 (2008)

  19. Ward, K.M., Bosek, R.L., Trimble, E.L.: Romantic relationships and interpersonal violence among adults with developmental disabilities. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 48, 89–98 (2010)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ly, K.: Learning disabilities: able to love. J. Commun. Pract, Health Visitors’ Assoc. 82, 12–13 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. McMillan, I.: Everyone has the right to learn the language of love. Learn. Disabil. Pract. 10, 7 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Volpe, M.A.: Irresponsible love: rethinking intellectual disability, humanity and the church. Modern Theol. 25, 491–501 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kijak, R.: A Desire for love: considerations on sexuality and sexual education of people with intellectual disability in Poland. Sex. Disabil. 29, 65–74 (2011)

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Morales, G. E., Lopez, E. O: Down Syndrome, Beyond the Intellectual Disability: Persons with Their Own Emotional World. New York: Nova Publisher. ISBN: 978-1-62618-467-1 (2013)

  25. Down’s Syndrome Research and Treatment Foundation. DS 101. Retrieved January 30, 2012 from http://www.dsrtf.org/page.aspx?pid=352

  26. Siebelink, F., de Jong, M., Taal, F., Roelvink, L.: Sexuality and people with intellectual disabilities: assessment of knowledge, experiences, and needs. Ment. Retard. 44, 283–294 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mullet, E., Morales, G. E., Makris, I., Rogé, B., Munoz Sastre, M. T.: Functional measurement: an incredibly flexible tool. Psicol. Int. J. Methodol. Exp. Psychol. [Special Issue on Functional Measurement] 33, 631–654 (2012)

  28. Anderson, N.H.: Methods of Information Integration Theory. Academic Press, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hofstede Center. http://geert-hofstede.com/the-hofstede-centre.html (2012). Retrieved November 12th, 2013

  30. Rogé, B., Mullet, E.: Blame and forgiveness judgments among children adolescents and adults with autism. Autism 15, 702–712 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marshall T. E.: The Old Way: A Story of the First People. New York: Picador (2006)

  32. De Waal, F.: Our inner ape: A leading primatologist explains why we are who we are. Riverhead, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Morales, G., Lopez Ramirez, E., Mullet, E.: Acceptability of sexual relationships among people with learning disabilities: family and professional caregivers’ views in Mexico. Sex. Disabil. 29, 165–174 (2011)

  34. Morales, G., Lopez Ramirez, E. O., Esterle, M., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., & Mullet, E.: Judging the acceptability of sexual intercourse among persons with learning disabilities: a Mexico-France comparison. Sex. Disabil. 28, 81–91 (2010)

  35. Morales, G. Functional measurement to cognitive mechanisms underlying attitudes toward sexuality and intellectual disability: new empirical directions. In Nicholas E. Peterson and Whitney Campbell (Eds.). Sexuality: Perspectives, Issues and Role in Society (pp. 29–54). New York: Nova Publisher. ISBN: 978-1-62081-531-1 (2012)

  36. Esterle, M., Muñoz Sastre, M. T., Mullet, E.: Judging the acceptability of sexual intercourse among persons with learning disabilities: French lay people’s viewpoint. Sex. Disabil. 26, 219–227 (2008)

  37. Swango-Wilson, A.: Caregiver’s perceptions and implications for sex education. Sex. Disabil. 26, 167–174 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Dyke, D.C., McBrien, D.M., Sherbondy, A.: Issues of sexuality in Down syndrome. Down Syndr. Res. Pract. 3, 65–69 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Aunos, M., Feldman, M.A.: Attitudes toward sexuality, sterilization, and parenting rights of persons with intellectual disabilities. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 15, 285–296 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etienne Mullet.

Appendix

Appendix

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morales, G.E., Lopez, E.O., Castro, C. et al. Conceptualization of Romantic Love Among Adults with Down’s Syndrome. Sex Disabil 33, 339–348 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-014-9368-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-014-9368-2

Keywords

Navigation