Abstract
The objective of the present study on corporate governance research in German-speaking countries is to portray the networks in this field, identify the central sources and actors, and establish the relations between individual subdisciplines. The present paper therefore uses bibliometric and network analysis to investigate business research literature in the leading journals in German-speaking countries. As none of the major citation databases could be used for the bibliometric analysis given the subject area under investigation, the first step was to create a bibliometric database for the planned evaluation. Using this as a basis, bibliometric evaluations were then carried out with a focus on co-citation analysis. This analysis was based on an evaluation of over 10,000 references in 267 source documents. This identified the key publications on business research in German-speaking countries that have a particularly strong influence on the subject of corporate governance. The various key areas were clustered according to similarity and visualized in a network.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
At the heart of the corporate governance discussion lies the separation of ownership and (corporate) control/power of disposition, which arose as a result of the spread of large publicly owned corporations from 1850 onwards and in the 20th century in particular. As a consequence of this separation, conflicts of interest and differences in discretionary powers developed between owners and managers, fostering opportunistic conduct on the part of the managers. As a result, corporate governance research focuses primarily on finding solutions to these problems. This is partly achieved on a theoretical basis, for instance through explanations provided by principal–agent theory or stewardship theory. Otherwise, attempts are made to address the lack of monitoring by introducing appropriate regulatory provisions and legislation, such as the Sarbanes–Oxley Act in the USA, or, in Germany, the Corporate Sector Supervision and Transparency Act (KonTraG), Company Transparency and Disclosure Act (TransPuG), and Accounting Law Modernization Act (BilMoG). Furthermore, codes of conduct known as “soft laws”, such as the German Corporate Governance Code (DCGK), also address this issue. Thus, overall, corporate governance can be regarded as a legal and de facto regulatory framework for managing, controlling, and monitoring a company. This regulatory framework comprises regulatory provisions, recommendations for conduct, as well as conduct at an individual, personal level.
Only German-language journals covering the entire spectrum of business administration are included in the database in order to obtain a holistic view of corporate governance research.
VOSviewer is a software program for visualizing clusters and network structures that was developed specifically for bibliometric purposes.
In order to ensure that a clear analysis was achieved, the document analysis level had to be reduced to the dimension of first authors for technical reasons.
References
Antle, R. (1984). Auditor Independence. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 1–20.
Backhaus, K., Erichson, B., Plinke, W., & Weiber, R. (2011). Multivariate analysemethoden. Heidelberg: Springer.
Ballwieser, W. (1987). Auditing in an agency setting. In G. Bamberg & K. Spremann (Eds.), Agency theory, information and incentives (pp. 327–346). Berlin: Springer.
Berle, A. A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Routledge.
Bradford, S. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85–86 (reprinted. Journal of Information Science, 1985, 10, 176–180).
Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge. Chicago: Scientific Communication.
Davis, J. H., Schoorman, D. F., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20–47.
de Price, D. J. S. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.
Diodato, V. (1994). Dictionary of bibliometrics. New York: Harworth Press.
Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship theory or agency theory. CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16, 49–64.
Ewert, R. (1990). Wirtschaftsprüfung und asymmetrische Information. Berlin: Springer.
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.
Freeman, E. R. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston: Cambridge University Press.
Garfield, E. (1984). Science citation index—A new dimension in indexing. Essays of an Information Scientist, 7, 525–535.
Gmür, M. (2003). Co-citation Analysis and the Search for Invisible Colleges. A Methodological Evaluation. Scientometrics, 57, 27–57.
Gmür, M. (2007). Wird die deutschsprachige Organisationsforschung immer amerikanischer? Eine bibliometrische Analyse. Die Unternehmung, 61, 227–248.
Hart, O. (1995). Corporate governance. Some theory and implications. Economic Journal, 105, 678–689.
Hauke, J., Lorscheid, I., & Meyer, M. (2017). Recent development of social simulation as reflected in JASSS between 2008 and 2014: A citation and co-citation analysis. JASSS-The Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3238.
Haustein, S., & Tunger, D. (2013). C 10 Sziento- und bibliometrische Verfahren. In R. Kuhlen, W. Semar, & D. Strauch (Eds.), Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation - Handbuch zur Einführung in die Informationswissenschaft und -praxis (pp. 479–492). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Holmström, B. R. (1979). Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74–91.
Hou, J. (2017). Exploration into the evolution and historical roots of citation analysis by referenced publication year spectroscopy. Scientometrics, 110, 1437–1452.
Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review, 76, 323–329.
Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831–880.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm. Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1979). Rights and production functions. An application to labor-managed firms and codetermination. The Journal of Business, 52, 469–506.
Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, K. J. (1990). Performance pay and top management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 225–264.
Leivrouw, L. A. (1989). The invisible college reconsidered: Bibliometrics and the development of scientific communication theory. Communication Research, 16, 615–628.
Li, L., et al. (2017). A bibliometric and visual analysis of global geo-ontology research. Computers & Geosciences, 99, 1–8.
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317–323.
Marshakova-Shaikevich, I. V. (1973). System of document connections based on references. Scientific and Technical Information Serial of VINITI [Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya Seriya 2: Informatsionnye Protsessy I Sistemy], 6, 3–8.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations. Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
Murphy, K. J. (1999). Executive compensation. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (pp. 2485–2563). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Newman, M. E. J., Strogatz, S. H., & Watts, D. J. (2001). Random graphs with arbitrary degree distribution and their applications. Physical Review E, 64(2), 026118.
Ross, S. A. (1973). The economic theory of agency. The principal’s problem. American Economic Review, 63, 134–139.
Roth, S., & Gmür, M. (2004). Struktur und Entwicklung der Marketingforschung. Ergebnisse einer Zitations- und Kozitationsanalyse nordamerikanischer Marketing-Journals 1987–2001. Marketing: Zeitschrift für Forschung und Praxis, 26, 141–158.
Schäffer, U., Binder, C., & Gmür, M. (2006). Struktur und Entwicklung der Controllingforschung. Eine Zitations- und Kozitationsanalyse von Controllingbeiträgen in deutschsprachigen Zeitschriften von 1970 bis 2003. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 76, 395–440.
Schäffer, U., Nevries, P., Fikus, C., & Meyer, M. (2011). Is finance research a “normal science”? A bibliometric study of the structure and development of finance research from 1988 to 2007. Schmalenbach Business Review, 63, 189–225.
Schlögl, C. (2000). Informationskompetenz am Beispiel einer szientometrischen Untersuchung zum Informationsmanagement. Knorz, G., Kuhlen, R. (Hrsg.).: Informationskompetenz – Basiskompetenz in der Informationsgesellschaft. Proceedings des 7. Internationalen Symposiums für Informationswissenschaft (ISI 2000)., Darmstadt, 2000. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft (pp. 89–111).
Schrader, U., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2009). VHB-JOURQUAL2. Method, Results, and Implications of the German Academic Association for Business Research’s Journal Ranking. Business Research, 2, 180–204.
Shaw, W. M. (1985). Critical thresholds in co-citation graphs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(1), 38–43.
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783.
Small, H. G. (1973). Co-citation in scientific literature. New measure of relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 24, 265–269.
Small, H. G. (2009). Critical thresholds for co-citation clusters and emergence of the giant component. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 332–340.
Small, H. G., & Greenlee, E. J. (1980). Co-citation context analysis of a co-citation cluster. Recombinant DNA. Scientometrics, 2, 277–301.
Stock, W. G. (2001). Publikation und Zitat – Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung. Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft 29. Köln.
Tunger, D. (2009). Bibliometrische Verfahren und Methoden als Beitrag zu Trendbeobachtung und –erkennung in den Naturwissenschaften. Jülich.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(8), 1635–1651.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010a). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2010b). VOSviewer Manual; Manual for VOSviewer version 1.5.0 vom 28.Mai.2012. published online [August, 22nd 2014]: http://www.vosviewer.com/.
van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2012)., VOSviewer Manual. Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.5.0. published online [August, 22nd 2014]: http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.5.0.pdf.
Van Raan, A. (2004). Measuring science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 19–50). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Warncke, M. (2005). Prüfungsausschuss und Corporate Governance. Berlin: Einrichtung, Organisation und Überwachungsaufgabe.
Welge, M. K., & Eulerich, M. (2012). Corporate-Governance-Management. Theorie und Praxis der guten Unternehmensführung.. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Winterhager, M. (1994). Die Messung wissenschaftlicher Leistung mit bibliometrischen Methoden. Bielefeld.
Witt, P. (2003). Corporate governance-systeme im wettbewerb. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tunger, D., Eulerich, M. Bibliometric analysis of corporate governance research in German-speaking countries: applying bibliometrics to business research using a custom-made database. Scientometrics 117, 2041–2059 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2919-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2919-z