Abstract
The range of theoretical frameworks currently being used by researchers into information behaviour is abundant and diverse. We need to examine thoroughly the contribution of theories and models to further research, as this would help to improve future investigations in the field. This paper adopts this approach, by thoroughly examining the influence that Elfreda Chatman’s three middle-range theories have had on subsequent research. A citation context analysis was carried out on the basis of those received by Information poverty theory, life in the round theory and normative behaviour theory. Analysis covered the year of publication, the type of work and the subject-matter of the citing documents. The cites in context or theoretical incidents were analysed for frequency of citation in citing documents, the content of Chatman’s work being cited, the context co-citation analysis, the citation style and the citation location. The analysis of citation in context has allowed us to draw a distinction between the author and her work, while verifying that not all cites are the same. These differences reflect the unequal relevance of these theories to subsequent research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, M. H. (2006). How can we know what we think until we see what we said? A citation and citation context analysis of Karl Weick’s the social psychology of organizing. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1675–1692. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606068346.
Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. T. (2010). What have scholars retrieved from Walsh and Ungson (1991)? A citation context study. Management Learning, 41(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507609341091.
APA. American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Bardin, L. (1986). El análisis de contenido. Madrid: Akal.
Bonzi, S. (1982). Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 33(4), 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630330404.
Boyack, K. W., van Eck, N. J., Colavizza, G., & Waltman, L. (2018). Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.11.005.
Brooks, F. P. (1975). The Mythical Man-Month. Essays on software engineering. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Burnett, G., Besant, M., & Chatman, E. A. (2001). Small worlds: Normative behavior in virtual communities and feminist bookselling. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 536–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1102.abs.
Burnett, G., Fisher, K. E., Fulton, C., & Hersberger, J. A. (2007). Channelling chatman: Questioning the applicability of a research legacy to today’s small world realities. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.1450430197.
Burnett, G., & Jaeger, P. T. (2008). Small worlds, lifeworlds, and information: The ramifications of the information behaviours of social groups in public policy and the public sphere. Information Research, 13(2), paper 346. Retrieved from InformationR.net/ir/13-2/paper346.html.
Burnett, G., Jaeger, P. T., & Thompson, K. M. (2008). Normative behavior and information: The social aspects of information access. Library and Information Science Research, 30(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2007.07.003.
Burnett, G., & Nocasian, M. (2008). A Romania of the imagination: Formula As, virtual community, and normative behavior. First Monday, 13(11), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v13i11.2257.
Case, D. O., & Given, L. M. (2016). Looking for information: A survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior (4th ed.). Bingley: Emerald.
Chang, Y.-W. (2013). The influence of Taylor’s paper, question-negotiation and information-seeking in libraries. Information Processing and Management, 49(5), 983–994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.03.003.
Chang, Y.-W. (2016). Influence of human behavior and the principle of least effort on library and information science research. Information Processing and Management, 52(4), 658–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.12.011.
Chatman, E. A. (1996). The impoverished life-world of outsiders. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199603)47:3%3c193:AID-ASI3%3e3.0.CO;2-T.
Chatman, E. A. (1999). A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:3%3c207:AID-ASI3%3e3.0.CO;2-8.
Chatman, E. A. (2000). Framing social life in theory and research. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 1, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(00)00021-2.
Cronin, B., & Meho, L. I. (2008). The shifting balance of intellectual trade in information studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(4), 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20764.
Dankasa, J. (2017). Seeking information in circles: The application of Chatman’s life in the round theory to the information small world of Catholic clergy in northern Nigeria. Journal of Information Science, 43(2), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551516632659.
Ding, Y., Liu, X., Guo, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.003.
Ellis, D. (1989). A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design. Journal of Documentation, 45(3), 171–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026843.
Fidel, R. (2012). Human information interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Fisher, K. E., Erdelez, S., & McKechnie, L. E. (Eds.). (2005). Theories of information behavior (pp. xix–xxii). Medford: Information Today.
Fisher, K. E., & Julien, H. (2009). Information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43, 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2009.1440430114.
Fulton, C. (2010). An ordinary life in the round: Elfreda Annmary Chatman. Libraries & the Cultural Record, 45(2), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1353/lac.0.0122.
González-Teruel, A. (2017). Referentes teóricos y dimensiones aplicadas en el estudio del usuario de la información. In M. N. González de Gómez & R. Rabello (Eds.), Informação: Agentes e intermediação (pp. 135–194). Brasilia: Instituto Brasileiro de Informaçao em Ciencia e Tecnologia.
González-Teruel, A., González-Alcaide, G., Barrios, M., & Abad-García, M. F. (2015). Mapping recent information behavior research: An analysis of co-authorship and co-citation networks. Scientometrics, 103(2), 687–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1548-z.
Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.
Lu, C., Ding, Y., & Zhang, C. (2017). Understanding the impact change of a highly cited article: A content-based citation analysis. Scientometrics, 112(2), 927–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2398-7.
McCain, K. W. (2011). Eponymy and obliteration by incorporation: The case of the “Nash Equilibrium”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1412–1424. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21536.
McCain, K. W., & Salvucci, L. J. (2006). How influential is Brooks’ law? A longitudinal citation context analysis of Frederick Brooks’ The Mythical Man-Month. Journal of Information Science, 32(3), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506064397.
McKechnie, L., Pettigrew, K. E., & Joyce, S. L. (2001). The origins and contextual use of theory in human information behaviour research. The New Review of Information Behaviour Research, 1, 47–63.
Pettigrew, K. E., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 35, 43–78.
Rosenbaum, H. (2010). Anthony Giddens’ influence on library and information science. In G. J. Leckie, L. M. Given, & J. Buschman (Eds.), Critical theory for library and information science (pp. 119–130). Santa Barbara, CA: ABC CLIO.
Savolainen, R. (2008). Everyday life information seeking. In M. Bates & M. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (pp. 155–163). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Savolainen, R. (2016a). Contributions to conceptual growth: The elaboration of Ellis’s model for information-seeking behavior. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 594–608. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23680.
Savolainen, R. (2016b). Conceptual growth in integrated models for information behaviour. Journal of Documentation, 72(4), 648–673. https://doi.org/10.1108/JDOC-09-2015-0114.
Sieweke, J. (2014). Pierre Bourdieu in management and organization studies–—A citation context analysis and discussion of contributions. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(4), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2014.04.004.
Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8(3), 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277800800305.
Small, H. (1980). Co-citation context analysis and the structure of paradigms. Journal of Documentation, 36(3), 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026695.
Spink, A., & Cole, C. (2005). Human information behavior: Integrating diverse approaches and information use. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20249.
Taskin, Z., & Al, U. (2017). A content-based citation analysis study based on text categorization. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2560-2.
Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College & Research Libraries, 28, 178–194.
Tsay, M.-Y. (2009). Citation analysis of Ted Nelson’s works and his influence on hypertext concept. Scientometrics, 79(3), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-1641-7.
Tuomaala, O., Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (2014). Evolution of library and information science, 1965–2005: Content analysis of journal articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(7), 1446–1462. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23034.
Vakkari, P. (1998). Growth of theories on information seeking: An analysis of growth of a theoretical research program on the relation between task complexity and information seeking. Information Processing and Management, 34(2–3), 361–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(97)00074-5.
Veinot, T. (2009). “A lot of people didn’t have a chance to support us because we never told them” Stigma management, information poverty and HIV/AIDS information/help networks. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2009.1450460273.
Walsh, J. P., & Ungson, G. R. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 57–91.
Wilson, T. (2008). The information user: Past, present and future. Journal of Information Science, 34(4), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551508091309.
Yang, H. (2009). The top 40 citation classics in the Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Scientometrics, 78(3), 421–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-2011-6.
Zhang, G., Ding, Y., & Milojević, S. (2013). Citation content analysis (CCA): A framework for syntactic and semantic analysis of citation content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1490–1503. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22850.
Zhu, X., Turney, P., Lemire, D., & Vellino, A. (2015). Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 408–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23179.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Boston: Addison-Wesley Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
González-Teruel, A., Abad-García, F. The influence of Elfreda Chatman’s theories: a citation context analysis. Scientometrics 117, 1793–1819 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2915-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2915-3