Abstract
In the absence of supporting and relevant data, one cannot (should not) infer whatever worthy conclusion.
Notes
References
Editorial. (2002). Decisions, decisions. Nature Neuroscience, 5(10), 917.
Gannon, F. (2006). Decisions, decisions. EMBO Reports, 7(10), 953.
García, J. A., Rodriguez-Sánchez, R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2015). The author–editor game. Scientometrics, 104(1), 361–380.
Mahian, O., Rashidi, M., Lorenzini, G., & Wongwises, S. (2015). Fame bias in editorial choice: Yes or no? Scientometrics 1–2. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1617-3.
Moustafa, K. (2015a). Is there bias in editorial choice? Yes. Scientometrics 1–3.
Moustafa, K. (2015b). A proposal for an ‘equal peer-review’ statement. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 36(8), 494–495.
Spier, R. E. (2002). Peer review and innovation. Science and Engineering Ethics 8(1): 99–108; discussion 109–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moustafa, K. Don’t infer anything from unavailable data. Scientometrics 105, 2271–2272 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1750-z
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1750-z