Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The extreme case of terrorism: a scientometric analysis

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How has the terrorism affected the research process and findings? The author tries to answer to this question through an exploratory analysis of the impact of these tragic events on the research outputs of scientists, institutions and countries. In particular, this report provides a wide range of scientometric data related to terrorism studies over the world during the two decades from 1991 to 2011. After the September 11, 2001 events (9/11) in the United States, the concerned academicians have responded in a way that they started producing an increasing number of research publications, as if they were under the influence of some kind of a driving force, stimulating the overall academic production linked to this tragic event. However, after this trend has reached its peak in 2002, that driving force has visibly weakened, and since the mid 2000’s, the number of research publication in the field of terrorism studies has steadily decreased. Nonetheless, the number of terrorist events per year, along with the property damage and fatality rate, has continuously increased over the observed lapse of time. Using these results as a backdrop, in this paper is argued that the field of terrorism research should be explored from a critical and multi-cultural perspective, and that all scientific researchers should remain objective, for scientific research is to be independent from political systems, its contingent events in any form, and the transitory historical circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abadie, A., & Gardeazabal, J. (2008). Terrorism and the world economy. European Economic Review, 52(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arin, K. P., Lorz, O., Reich, O. F. M., & Spagnolo, N. (2011). Exploring the dynamics between terrorism and anti-terror spending: Theory and UK-evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 77(2), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bala, A., & Gupta, B. M. (2012). Measles: A quantitative analysis of world publications during 2001–2010. Journal of Scientometric Research, 1(1), 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno De Mesquita, E., & Dickson, E. S. (2007). The propaganda of the deed: Terrorism, counterterrorism, and mobilization. American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), 364–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullis, D. R., & Irving, R. D. (2013). Journals supporting terrorism research: Identification and investigation into their impact on the social sciences. College & Research Libraries, crl-314, 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buresa, O. (2006). EU counterterrorism policy: A paper tiger? Terrorism and Political Violence, 18(1), 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J. F. (2006). Scopus database: A review. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 3, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Chung, W., Qin, J., Reid, E., Sageman, M., & Weimann, G. (2008). Uncovering the dark Web: A case study of Jihad on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(8), 1347–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauset, A., & Wiegel, F. W. (2010). A generalized aggregation–disintegration model for the frequency of severe terrorist attacks. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 54(1), 179–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clauset, A., & Woodard, R. (2012). Estimating the historical and future probabilities of large terrorist events. arXiv:1209.0089.

  • Dess, H. M. (2006). Database reviews and reports—Scopus. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. doi:10.5062/F4X0650T. Retrieved April 10, 2013, from http://www.istl.org/06-winter/databases4.html.

  • Drakos, K., & Giannakopoulos, N. (2009). An econometric analysis of counterterrorism effectiveness: The impact on life and property losses. Public Choice, 139(1–2), 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frago, M., La Porte, T., & Phalen, P. (2010). The narrative reconstruction of 9/11 in Hollywood films: Independent voice or official interpretation? Javnost, 17(3), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B. S., & Luechinger, S. (2004). Decentralization as a disincentive for terror. European Journal of Political Economy, 20(2), 509–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galea, S., Ahern, J., Resnick, H., Kilpatrick, D., Bucuvalas, M., Gold, J., et al. (2002). Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. New England Journal of Medicine, 346(13), 982–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. (2005a). The peripheral terrorism literature: Bringing it closer to the core. Scientometrics, 62(3), 403–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. (2005b). Homeland security literature in relation to terrorism publications: The source and the response. Scientometrics, 65(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. (2007). Transient and continuant authors in a research field: The case of terrorism. Scientometrics, 72(2), 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GTD. (2013). The Global Terrorism Database (GTD). Retrieved April 10, 2013, from http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/using-gtd/.

  • Gunning, J. (2007). A case for critical terrorism studies? Government and Opposition, 42(3), 363–393.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B. (2002). Rethinking terrorism and counterterrorism since 9/11. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 25(5), 303–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R., Gunning, J., & Smyth M. B. (2007). The case for a critical terrorism studies. Prepared for delivery at the 2007 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30–September 2, 2007. Retrieved April 10, 2013, from http://cadair.aber.ac.uk/dspace/bitstream/handle/2160/1945/APSA-2007-Paper-final2.pdf?sequence=1.

  • Jacques, K., & Taylor, P. J. (2009). Female terrorism: A review. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21(3), 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (2002). Defending ways of life: The (anti-)terrorist rhetorics of Bush and Blair. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(4), 211–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. F. (2011). Escalation, timing and severity of insurgent and terrorist events: Toward a unified theory of future threats. arXiv:1109.2076v1.

  • Kellner, D. M. (2010). Cinema wars: Hollywood film and politics in the Bush–Cheney era. Malden, MA: Wiley. Retrieved April 10, 2013, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444314809.ch2.

  • LaFree, G. (2010). The global terrorism database: Accomplishments and challenges. Perspectives on Terrorism, 4(1), 24–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G., & Dugan, L. (2007). Introducing the global terrorism database. Terrorism and Political Violence, 19(2), 181–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leistedt, S. J. (2013). Behavioural aspects of terrorism. Forensic Science International, 228(1–3), 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C.-H., Liou, D.-Y., & Wu, K.-W. (2007). Opportunities and challenges created by terrorism. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(2), 148–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, O., & Ryder, C. (2012). Deadliness, organizational change and suicide attacks: Understanding the assumptions inherent in the use of the term ‘new terrorism’. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 5(2), 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnone, E. (2012). An analysis for estimating the short-term effects of Japan’s triple disaster on progress in materials science. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 289–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markisova, V. A., Wilson, C. S., & Davis, M. (2002). From bioweapon to biodefense. The collaborative literature of biodefense in the 1990s. Scientometrics, 53(1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohtadi, H., & Murshid, A. P. (2006). Analyzing catastrophic terrorist events with applications to the food industry. In H. Richardson (Ed.), The economic costs and consequences of terrorism. London: Edward Elgar. ISBN #1845427343.

  • Phillips, P. J. (2010). The randomization of terrorist attacks. Defense & Security Analysis, 26(3), 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pounder, C. (2002). Anti-terrorism legislation: The impact on the processing of data. Computers & Security, 21(3), 240–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, E. F. (1997). Evolution of a body of knowledge: An analysis of terrorism research. Information Processing and Management, 33(I), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid, E. F., & Chen, H. (2007). Mapping the contemporary terrorism research domain. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 65, 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, D. L. (2005). The emergence of competitors to the Science. Citation Index and the Web of Science. Current Science, 89(9), 1531–1536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, L. S., & Annas, G. J. (2009). Medical ethics at Guantanamo Bay detention centre and in the US military: A time for reform. The Lancet, 374(9686), 353–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabido, R. M. S. (2009). When the ‘other’ becomes ‘us’: Mediated representations, ‘terrorism’ and the ‘war on terror’. Platform, 1(1), 67–82.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, A. P. (2004). Frameworks for conceptualising terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 16(2), 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silke, A. (2008). Research on terrorism—A review of the impact of 9/11 and the global war on terrorism. In H. Chen, E. Reid, J. Sinai, A. Silke, & B. Ganor (Eds.), Terrorism informatics: Knowledge management and data mining for homeland security series: Integrated series in information systems (Vol. 18(XLII), pp. 27–50).

  • START. (2012). National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. Global Terrorism Database [Data file]. Retrieved April 10, 2013, from http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd.

  • Steans, J. (2008). Telling stories about women and gender in the war on terror. Global Society, 22(1), 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2010). Is terrorism a group phenomenon? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 121–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toft, P., Duero, A., & Bieliauskas, A. (2010). Terrorist targeting and energy security. Energy Policy, 38(8), 4411–4421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, H. (2012). Dependent citizen journalism and the publicity of terror. Terrorism and Political Violence, 24(3), 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weessies, K. W. (2007). The publishing dynamics of catastrophic events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 856–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, J. (2007). Beyond anti-terrorism: Metaphors as message strategy of post-September-11 U.S. public diplomacy. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry & Biochemical Engineering, Dongguk University, Manhae gwan 304-278, 30, Phildong-ro 1gil, Jung-gu, Seoul, 100-715, Republic of Korea

    Edoardo Magnone

Authors
  1. Edoardo Magnone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edoardo Magnone.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Magnone, E. The extreme case of terrorism: a scientometric analysis. Scientometrics 101, 179–201 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1378-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1378-4

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation